How Many People with Employer-Sponsored Insurance Use the Drugs Slated for Medicare Price Negotiations

Authors: Delaney Tevis, Justin Lo, Matthew Rae, and Cynthia Cox
Published: Aug 14, 2024

Among the 167 million people with employer-sponsored insurance in 2022, 3.4 million used at least one of the first 10 drugs identified for Medicare price negotiations, according to a new analysis. The most used drug for people with employer-sponsored health insurance was Jardiance, a drug used to treat diabetes and heart failure, which was taken by more than 911,000 enrollees.

The analysis uses the Merative MarketScan 2022 commercial claims to estimate the number of enrollees in the employer-sponsored insurance market who use one or more of the ten drugs selected for Medicare Part D price negotiations.

The full analysis and other data on health costs are available on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, an online information hub dedicated to monitoring and assessing the performance of the U.S. health system.

2024 Women’s Health Survey

The 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey (WHS) is the latest in a series of nationally representative surveys on women’s health conducted by KFF since 2001. The survey’s objective is to track and document women’s experiences and knowledge related to health and well-being. The 2024 survey includes a nationally representative sample of 6,246 adults ages 18 to 64, including 5,055 women and 1,191 men, and was conducted from May 15 to June 18, 2024. To better understand health care disparities, the survey includes representative samples of Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander women as well as those who identify as LGBT+. Briefs are focused on abortion experiences, knowledge, and attitudes among reproductive age women in the U.S., as well Florida and Arizona. Additional areas of focus include women’s experiences with contraception, and fertility services, mental health, and intimate partner violence and other topics related to health care access, cost, and insurance coverage.

ABORTION

Women and Abortion in the U.S.

Information from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey about women’s experiences with abortion, the fallout of overturning Roe v. Wade, women’s knowledge about abortion laws in their states including medication abortion, as well as their opinions on the legality of abortion.

Women and Abortion in Florida

This brief provides information about abortion experiences, awareness, and attitudes of Florida women ages 18 to 49, based on findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey, a nationally representative survey on health care issues.

Women and Abortion in Arizona

Information about abortion experiences, awareness, and attitudes of Arizona women ages 18 to 49, based on findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey, a nationally representative survey on health care issues.

ACCESS

Access to Pregnancy and Parenting Support Services

This analysis, based on findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey, focuses on women with children ages 5 & under and their perceptions on how easy or difficult they feel it is to access a range of services that are important to the health of women and families, including maternity care, Medicaid coverage, food stamps, contraceptive services, and affordable childcare.

Access to Fertility Care

This brief provides new data from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey on access to fertility care, including women’s opinions about access in their state, cost barriers, and the range of fertility services that women use.


CONTRACEPTION

Contraceptive Experiences, Coverage, and Preferences

This brief offers a close examination of women’s experiences with contraception, insurance coverage, contraceptive preferences, and interactions with the health care system. We also explore the influence and reach of contraceptive information on social media.

A Spotlight on Vasectomy

As part of the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey, a nationally representative sample of 1,191 men ages 18 to 64 were surveyed on a broad range of health issues. This data note highlights their responses to their experiences, knowledge, and perspectives about vasectomy services.


EXPERIENCES

Women’s Experiences with Intimate Partner Violence

This analysis provides data on women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) and reports on a range of health topics affecting women who experienced IPV in the past five years, including their health care needs and use, barriers, and mental health.

LGBT

News Release

Similar Shares of Republican, Democratic, and Independent Women (One in Seven) Report Having Had an Abortion

More than Six in Ten Women of Reproductive Age Are Concerned About Access to Abortion If It Was Needed to Preserve Their Own Life or Health or That of Someone Close to Them

Published: Aug 14, 2024

A new nationally representative KFF Women’s Health Survey, which explores the extensive implications of Roe v. Wade being overturned by the Supreme Court, reveals that one in seven (14%) women of reproductive age report having had an abortion at some point in their life. Across partisanship, similar shares of Republican women (12%), Democratic women (14%), and independents (15%) report having had an abortion.

The survey uncovered concern over access to abortion services in emergencies. More than six in 10 women of reproductive-age (18-49 years old) across the United States (63%) are concerned that they, or someone close to them, would not be able to get an abortion if it was needed to preserve their life or health. They are also concerned that abortion bans may affect the safety of a potential future pregnancy for themselves or someone close to them (64%).

Nationally, three-quarters of reproductive-age women who are Democrats and six in 10 independent women are concerned about abortion access in cases of pregnancy-related emergencies. A sizable minority of Republican women in this age group nationally (42%) also share these concerns.

A cross-partisan trend emerged in whether abortion policy should be left up to individual states, a policy that former President Trump has said he supports, which allows the current bans and restrictions to stay in effect across half the country. The survey shows that seven in 10 reproductive-age women (74%) oppose leaving abortion policy up to the individual states to determine, including most Republicans (53%), Democrats (86%), and independents (73%).

In addition, many women across the U.S. are unaware of the status of abortion policy in their state (45%), how to obtain an abortion if they need one in the near future (26%), or that people in their state can get medication abortion pills online (19%). Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, the landscape involving abortion bans and restrictions at the state level has been shifting rapidly.

The survey also explores the abortion experiences and perspectives of women in Florida—where it is on the ballot this November—and Arizona, a swing state that may have an abortion ballot initiative this fall. Nearly one in five (18%) reproductive-age women in Florida report they have had an abortion. Among women of reproductive-age in Arizona, 15% say they have had an abortion at some point in their lives. Seven in 10 women in Arizona (70%) and Florida (72%) say abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Additional findings include:

  • In Florida, only one in five (18%) are aware medication abortion is still legal in their state (abortion is available until six weeks in Florida). About a third (34%) don’t know where to get an abortion or where to find the information should they need one, and only one in ten (9%) are aware that medication abortion pills can be obtained online. Awareness is similarly limited in Arizona (where abortion is currently available up to 15 weeks), particularly among women with lower incomes who are affected disproportionately by restrictions on abortion, have lower awareness about abortion access in their state, and have more significant concerns about pregnancy safety.
  • The fallout from the overturning of Roe v. Wade has resulted in a substantial number of women who report struggling themselves—or knowing someone who struggled—to get an abortion. Nearly one in ten (8%) women of reproductive age in the United States personally know someone, including themselves, who has had difficulty getting an abortion since Roe v. Wade was overturned, including 11% of Hispanic women and 13% of women living in states with abortion bans. Among the barriers cited were traveling out of state for care, not knowing where to go, and lacking the money to cover the cost.
  • Across the United States, 17% of reproductive-age women report changing their contraceptive practices as a result of Roe v. Wade being overturned. Actions taken include starting birth control, getting a sterilization procedure, switching to a more effective method, or purchasing emergency contraceptive pills to have on hand.

Periodically conducted since 2001, this 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey analysis includes a nationally representative sample of 3,901 women ages 18 to 49. The survey was fielded from May 15 to June 18, 2024, and was developed and analyzed by KFF staff.

Read the three reports:

Abortion Experiences, Knowledge, and Attitudes Among Women in the U.S.: Findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey

Women and Abortion in Florida: Findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey 

Women and Abortion in Arizona: Findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey 

Women and Abortion in Florida: Findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey

Published: Aug 14, 2024

Findings

Key Takeaways

  • Nearly one in five (18%) reproductive age women in Florida say they have had an abortion. Similar shares of Republican (20%) and Democratic (19%) women report having an abortion.
  • One in ten (10%) reproductive age women in Florida know someone, including themselves, who has had difficulty getting an abortion since Roe v. Wade was overturned and over a third (34%) of women would not know where they could get an abortion or find the information if they wanted or needed one.
  • Six in ten women of reproductive age in Florida are concerned that they or someone close to them would not be able to get an abortion if it was needed to preserve their life or health (60%) and that abortion bans may affect the safety of a potential future pregnancy for themselves or someone close to them, such as a family or close friend (62%).
  • Two-thirds (65%) of reproductive age women in Florida have heard of medication abortion. Only one in five (18%) are aware it is still legal in their state and one in ten (9%) are aware they could access pills online if they wanted or needed them.
  • Nearly three in four (72%) reproductive age women in Florida think abortion should be legal in all or most cases, including the majority of Republican (51%) and Democratic (86%) women.
  • Two-thirds (67%) support a nationwide right to abortion, including large shares of Republican (49%) and Democratic (79%) women. Over half (57%) oppose a nationwide ban on abortion at 15 weeks and nearly seven in ten (69%) oppose leaving it up to the states to decide whether abortion is legal or not in each state. The majority of Republican (54%) and Democratic (79%) women oppose leaving it up to the states.

Introduction

Abortion is a key issue in the upcoming 2024 election and voters in up to 11 states across the U.S. may have an opportunity to vote on abortion-related ballot measures. On May 1, 2024, Florida’s 6-week abortion ban went into effect, limiting abortion before many women know they are pregnant and restricting access for women who were traveling to Florida to access abortion from across the South. This November, Florida voters will have an opportunity to vote on a citizen-initiated ballot measure that would protect the right to abortion up to viability (around 24 weeks of pregnancy) and when necessary, after that point to safeguard the pregnant person’s health.

This brief presents findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey for 512 reproductive age women in Florida to provide state representative estimates of women’s experiences with and views on abortion among women in the state. The survey was fielded from May 13 to June 18, 2024, before Biden withdrew from the presidential race. While the survey asked about many topics related to women’s experiences around a broad set of health topics, this brief focuses on women’s experiences and knowledge around abortion in Florida. An analysis of the findings for women in the United States and also in Arizona are also available. See the methodology section for detailed definitions, sampling design, and margins of sampling error.

The findings in this brief are focused on a state-representative sample of 512 reproductive age (18-49 years old) women in Florida (Figure 1). Findings for White and Hispanic women are presented where there was a large enough share to report on with nearly a third (31%) of reproductive age women in Florida identifying as Hispanic and 45% as non-Hispanic White. Over four in ten (41%) reproductive age women in Florida have incomes below 200% of the federal poverty level (FPL), which is $29,160 in 2024. Nearly half (46%) of reproductive age women in Florida are Democrats or Democrat-leaning, while 35% are Republican or Republican-leaning, and 19% are independents. These demographics are similar to the U.S. demographics overall, aside from race/ethnicity, where 21% are Hispanic and 54% as non-Hispanic White.

Findings

Women’s Experiences with Abortion

Nearly one in five reproductive age women in Florida report they have ever had an abortion (Figure 2). Similar shares of women across income and party ID report having had an abortion. Smaller shares of women who identify as pro-life say they have had an abortion compared to women who identify as pro-choice.

Nearly One in Five Reproductive Age Women in Florida Report Having an Abortion

Among those who say they have wanted or needed an abortion, 14% say they were unable get one (3% among all reproductive age women). Among the reasons women cite for not getting an abortion include not being able to afford it, being too far along, not being in a position to care for a child and being pro-life or having religious reasons.

One in ten (10%) women in Florida know someone, including themselves, who has had difficulty getting an abortion since Roe v. Wade was overturned, similar to the U.S. share (8%) (Figure 3). Larger shares of Democratic women say they know someone, including themselves, who has had difficulty getting an abortion compared to Republican women (15% vs. 5%).

One in Ten Reproductive Age Women in Florida Personally Know Someone Who Has Had Difficulty Getting an Abortion Since Roe v. Wade was Overturned

When asked about ease or difficulty accessing abortion services in Florida, nearly half (48%) say abortion services are difficult to access, and another 42% say they don’t know (Figure 4). Larger shares of Democratic women (60%) and those who identify as pro-choice (59%) say it is difficult to access these services compared to Republican women (34%) and those who identify as pro-life (23%). When the survey was fielded, Florida had just instituted a 6-week LMP abortion ban after having a 15-week ban in place since 2022.

Nearly Half of Reproductive Age Women in Florida Say It Is Difficult to Get Abortion Services in Their State, But Many Don't Know

The majority of women in Florida are concerned about the impact of abortion restrictions on health and safety for themselves and loved ones. Florida currently limits abortions to 6-weeks of pregnancy with exceptions for life, physical health, rape/incest, and lethal fetal anomalies after that gestational limit. Six in ten reproductive age women in Florida say they are concerned (60%) they or someone close to them would not be able to get an abortion if it was needed to preserve their life or health, including a third (35%) who say they are very concerned (Figure 5). Nearly three in four Hispanic women (72%) and women who identify as pro-choice (75%), as well as eight in ten (81%) Democratic women are concerned.

Florida Amendment 4, the Right to Abortion InitiativeFlorida Amendment 4, a citizen-initiated ballot measure, will appear on the November 2024 ballot in Florida. Abortion access is currently limited to the first 6 weeks of pregnancy, but a "yes” vote in the election will support the establishment of a constitutional right to abortion before fetal viability (around 24 weeks of pregnancy) or when necessary to protect the patient’s health, as determined by the patient’s healthcare provider. It will need 60% of Florida voters to vote “yes” in order to pass.

Six in Ten Reproductive Age Women in Florida Are Concerned They or Someone Close to Them Would Not Be Able to Get an Abortion if It Was Needed to Preserve Their Life or Health

Nearly two-thirds (62%) of reproductive age women in Florida say they are concerned about the impact abortion bans may have on the safety of a potential future pregnancy for themselves or someone close to them (Figure 6). Seven in ten Hispanic women (71%), Democratic women (78%), and women who identify as pro-choice (76%) are concerned compared to 58% of White women, 44% of Republican women, and 29% of women who identify as pro-life.

Six in Ten Reproductive Age Women in Florida Are Concerned That Abortion Bans May Affect the Safety of a Potential Future Pregnancy for Themselves or Someone Close to Them

About one in five (19%) reproductive age women in Florida have changed their contraceptive practices as a result of the overturning Roe v. Wade. Women report either obtaining emergency contraception to have on hand, having a procedure for permanent birth control, switching to a more effective method of birth control, or starting using birth control since the overturning of Roe v. Wade (Figure 7). One in four (26%) reproductive age women with low incomes (below 200% of the FPL) report taking one of these actions, double the rate of women with higher incomes (13%) (data not shown). Women with low incomes report getting emergency contraception at more than twice the rate of women with higher incomes (11% vs. 4%) (data not shown).

Nearly One in Five Reproductive Age Women in Florida Have Changed Their Contraceptive Practices as a Result of the Overturning of Roe v. Wade

Awareness of Abortion Availability and Policy

Many women reproductive age women in Florida are unsure about the status of abortion availability in the state. When this survey was fielded, Florida’s 6-week LMP ban had recently taken effect. Four in ten women in Florida (40%) correctly describe the status of abortion in Florida as available but limited to earlier in pregnancy (Figure 8). Nearly a quarter (24%) of women describe abortion as generally unavailable, with few exceptions, which for many is an accurate description of a 6-week ban. Another three in ten (29%) are not sure of the status of abortion in Florida and 7% incorrectly respond that abortion is available with few or no restrictions. About four in ten women with lower incomes (39%) and women who identify as pro-life (38%) are not sure of the status of abortion in Florida compared to 17% of women with higher incomes and 25% of women who identify as pro-life.

Over One in Four Reproductive Age Women in Florida Are Not Sure About the Status of Abortion Restrictions in Their State

A third (34%) of reproductive age women in Florida say they would not know where they could get an abortion nor where to find the information about getting one if they wanted or needed an abortion in the near future (Figure 9). Websites like Plan C , AbortionFinder  and ineedana.com, identify the nearest online and bricks-and-mortar abortion providers, as well as funding assistance. These websites also identify how people can find medication abortion pills online.

A Third of Reproductive Age Women in Florida Say That If They Wanted or Needed an Abortion In the Near Future, They Do Not Know Where They Could Get One and Wouldn't Know Where to Find That Information

Two-thirds (65%) of women of reproductive age in Florida have heard of medication abortion, with awareness highest among White women, those with higher incomes and Democrats (Figure 10). The overall share of reproductive age women in Florida who have heard of medication abortion is similar to the overall share across the U.S (67%).

Two-Thirds of Reproductive Age Women in Florida Have Heard of Medication Abortion, but Knowledge Is Lower Among Hispanic and Low Income Women

Although medication abortion is a legal option in Florida for abortions up to six weeks of pregnancy, only one in five (18%) reproductive age women are aware that it is the case. A larger share of women who identify as pro-choice are aware compared to women who identify as pro-life (21% vs. 14%) (Figure 11).

Only One in Five Reproductive Age Women in Florida Are Aware of the Legal Status of Medication Abortion in Their State

Few are aware of the availability of medication abortion pills online. In Florida, medication abortion is permitted up to six weeks of pregnancy, but only from an in-person clinic. The law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy also prohibits providers from using telehealth to offer abortion services, requiring that physicians dispense medication abortion pills to their patients in person. There are websites, however, such as Plan C, ineedana, or AbortionFinder, that provide information for people seeking to buy medication abortion pills online and have them sent to Florida. However, awareness of these online services is low. Only one in ten (9%) reproductive age women in Florida are aware that someone could get medication abortion pills online if they wanted or needed them (Figure 12). Awareness is similarly low across age, race/ethnicity, income, party ID, and people’s views on abortion.

Only One in Ten Reproductive Age Women in Florida Are Are Aware That Someone in Their State Can Get Medication Abortion Pills Online if They Wanted or Needed Them

Opinions on Abortion Policy

Seven in ten (72%) of reproductive age women living in Florida think abortion should be legal in all or most cases (Figure 13). Notably, half of reproductive age women who are Republican in the state say they believe abortion should be legal in most or all cases. Even among women who say they are “pro-life, one in four believe abortion should be legal in most cases. Nearly three in four women who identify as pro-life (73%), and half (48%) of Republican women think abortion should be illegal in all or most cases.

Seven in Ten Reproductive Age Women in Florida Think Abortion Should Be Legal in All or Most Cases

Since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, there have been calls to establish a nationwide right to abortion, which is supported by two-thirds of reproductive age women in Florida. Not surprisingly, higher shares of Democratic women in Florida support a national guarantee of abortion rights compared to Republican women (79% vs. 49%) and larger shares of women who identify as pro-choice compared to pro-life (83% vs. 30%) (Figure 14). The majority of Hispanic and White women in Florida, as well as women across incomes, support a law guaranteeing a nationwide right to abortion.

Two-Thirds of Reproductive Age Women in Florida Support a Law Guaranteeing a Nationwide Right to Abortion

Support for a nationwide ban on abortion at 15 weeks is weak in Florida. Early in the campaign, Former President Trump said he would consider supporting a national 15 or 16-week ban on abortion, but more recently has said he supports leaving abortion policy to states, which allows full bans and gestational restrictions to stay in effect. While a higher share of Republican women (60%) and women who identify as pro-life (68%) would support it, over half (57%) of reproductive age women in Florida oppose a law establishing a nationwide ban on abortion at 15 weeks (Figure 15).

Over Half of Reproductive Age Women in Florida Oppose A Law Establishing a Nationwide Ban on Abortion at 15 Weeks

Over two-thirds (69%) of women in Florida oppose leaving it up to the states to decide the legality of abortion, a policy that has been supported by former President Donald Trump (Figure 16). This policy, however, is somewhat or strongly supported by 54% of reproductive age Republican women. Larger shares of women who identify as pro-life support leaving it up to the states compared to women who identify as pro-choice (57% vs. 19%).

Over Two-Thirds of Reproductive Age Women in Florida Oppose Leaving It up to the States to Decide Whether Abortion Is Legal or Not in Each State

After six months of living with a highly restrictive abortion law that limits abortion access to the first six weeks of pregnancy, voters will have an opportunity to cast a vote regarding whether the right to abortion up to viability will be enshrined in their state constitution. If the amendment gets the support of 60 percent of voters, it will reverse the current 6-week ban and protect abortion rights until the point of viability, considered to be about 24 weeks.

Methodology

The 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey was designed and analyzed by women’s health researchers at KFF. The survey was conducted from May 13 - June 18, 2024, online and by telephone among a nationally representative sample of 6,246 adults ages 18 to 64, including 3,901 women ages 18 to 49. Women include anyone who selected woman as their gender (n = 3,867) or who said they were non-binary (n = 26), transgender (n = 4), or another gender (n = 3) and chose to answer the female set of questions with regard to sexual and reproductive health. The project includes oversamples of women ages 18 to 49 in Arizona (n = 298) and Florida (n = 512). Sampling, data collection, weighting, tabulation, and IRB approval by the University of Southern Maine’s Collaborative Institutional Review Board were managed by SSRS of Glenn Mills, Pennsylvania in collaboration with women’s health researchers at KFF.

Throughout the reports of findings, we refer to “women”. This includes respondents who said their gender is “woman,” plus those who said their gender is “transgender,” or “non-binary,” or another gender and that they prefer to answer the survey’s set of questions for females. We followed this approach to try to include as many people as possible but recognize that some people who need and seek abortion and other reproductive health care services may not be represented in the findings or identify as women.

The national sample as well as the samples in Arizona and Florida were drawn from two nationally representative probability-based panels: the SSRS Opinion Panel and the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. The SSRS Opinion Panel is a nationally representative probability-based panel where panel members are recruited randomly in one of two ways: (a) Through invitations mailed to respondents randomly sampled from an Address-Based Sample (ABS) provided by Marketing Systems Groups (MSG) through the U.S. Postal Service’s Computerized Delivery Sequence (CDS); (b) from a dual-frame random digit dial (RDD) sample provided by MSG. For the online panel component, invitations were sent to panel members by email followed by up to five reminder emails. 5,276 panel members completed the survey online and panel members who do not use the internet were reached by phone (175). Another 970 respondents were reached online through the Ipsos Knowledge Panel to help reach adequate sample sizes among subgroups of interest, specifically women ages 18 to 49. This panel is recruited using ABS, based on a stratified sample from the CDS. The questionnaire was translated into Spanish, so respondents were able to complete the survey in English or Spanish.

The national sample was weighted by splitting the sample into three groups: [1] Women 18-49, [2] Women 50-64, and [3] Men 18-64 and each group was separately weighted to match known population parameters (see table below for weighting variables and sources). Weights within the three groups were then trimmed at the 4th and 96th percentiles, to ensure that individual respondents do not have too much influence on survey-derived estimates. After the weights were trimmed, the samples were combined, and the weights adjusted, so that the groups were represented in their proper proportions for a final combined, gender by age-adjusted weight. Lastly, two additional weights for interviews among women 18-49 in Arizona and Florida were calculated for analyses among those specific sub-groups. Each of the state-specific weights were trimmed at the 2nd and 98th percentiles, to ensure that individual respondents do not have too much influence on survey-derived estimates.

DimensionsSource
AgeCPS 2023 ASEC
Education
Age by Education
Age by Gender
Census Region
Race/Ethnicity by Nativity
Home Tenure
Civic EngagementCPS 2021 Volunteering & Civic Engagement Supplement
Internet FrequencySSRS Opinion Panel Database 2024
Population DensityACS 206-2020 5-year data
NEP RegionsCensus Planning Database 2022
Voter RegistrationCPS 2022 Voting & Registration Supplement

The margins of sampling error for the national sample of reproductive age women, Arizona reproductive age women, and Florida reproductive age women are plus or minus 2 percentage points, 8 percentage points, and 6 percentage points respectively. Numbers of respondents and margins of sampling error for key subgroups are shown in the table below. For results based on other subgroups, the margin of sampling error may be higher. Sampling error is only one of many potential sources of error and there may be other unmeasured error in this survey.

 GroupN (unweighted)M.O.S.E.
National Women Ages 18-493901± 2 percentage points
White, non-Hispanic1856± 3 percentage points
Black, non-Hispanic603± 5 percentage points
Hispanic963± 4 percentage points
Asian286± 7 percentage points
<200% FPL1667± 3 percentage points
200%+ FPL1974± 3 percentage points
Pro-life1074± 4 percentage points
Pro-choice2815± 2 percentage points
Republican/Republican-leaning1076± 4 percentage points
Democrat/Democrat-leaning1803± 3 percentage points
Urban/Suburban3379± 2 percentage points
Rural473± 6 percentage points
Lives in a state where abortion is banned857± 4 percentage points
Lives in a state where abortion has gestational limits 6-12 weeks819± 5 percentage points
Lives in a state where abortion has gestational limits 15-22 weeks594± 6 percentage points
Lives in a state where gestational limited are 24+ weeks or none1631± 3 percentage points
Arizona Women Ages 18-49298± 8 percentage points
<200% FPL121± 12 percentage points
200%+ FPL162± 10 percentage points
Florida Women Ages 18-49512± 6 percentage points
White, non-Hispanic229± 9 percentage points
Hispanic155± 11 percentage points
<200% FPL182± 10 percentage points
200%+ FPL297± 8 percentage points
Pro-life143± 12 percentage points
Pro-choice366± 7 percentage points
Republican/Republican-leaning169± 11 percentage points
Democrat/Democrat-leaning231± 9 percentage points

 

Abortion Experiences, Knowledge, and Attitudes Among Women in the U.S.: Findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey

Published: Aug 14, 2024

Findings

Key Takeaways

  • Among women of reproductive age, one in seven (14%) have had an abortion at some point in their life. Larger shares of Black (21%) and Hispanic (19%) women report having had an abortion compared to 11% of White women. Across partisanship, similar shares of Republican women, Democratic women, and independents report having had an abortion.
  • Nearly one in ten (8%) women of reproductive age personally know someone who has had difficulty getting an abortion since Roe v. Wade was overturned, including 11% of Hispanic women and 13% of women living in states with abortion bans.
  • Among women of reproductive age who report knowing someone personally who has had difficulty getting an abortion since Roe v. Wade was overturned, many say they had to travel out of state for care (68%), did not know where to go (40%), and/or did not have the money to cover the cost (35%).
  • More than six in ten women of reproductive age are concerned that they, or someone close to them, would not be able to get an abortion if it was needed to preserve their life or health (63%) and that abortion bans may affect the safety of a potential future pregnancy for themselves or someone close to them (64%).
  • Less than half of reproductive age women in the United States are aware of the current status of abortion policy in their state (45%). Nearly a quarter describe the status incorrectly (23%) and a third are unsure about the status of abortion in their state (32%).
  • One in four (26%) reproductive age women say if they needed or wanted an abortion they would not know where to go nor where to find information.
  • Nearly one in five women (17%) of reproductive age report they have changed their contraceptive practices as a result of Roe being overturned. Actions taken include starting birth control, getting a sterilization procedure, switching to a more effective method, or purchasing emergency contraceptive pills to have on hand.
  • While two-thirds of women have heard about medication abortion pills, only 19% of women say people in their state can get medication abortion pills online.
  • Three in four reproductive age women in the United States think abortion should be legal in most or all cases (74%). The majority support a nationwide right to abortion (70%), oppose a nationwide abortion ban at 15 weeks (64%), and oppose leaving it up to the states to determine the legality of abortion (74%). This is the case for the majority of women who are Democrats and independents as well as smaller but still substantial shares of Republicans.

Introduction

In the two years since the Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe and eliminated the federal standards that had protected the right to abortion for almost 50 years, the abortion landscape in the United States has drastically changed. Abortion is banned in 14 states and an additional six states have implemented early gestational limits between 6 and 15 weeks.

Abortion will likely be a key issue in the upcoming 2024 election. The Democratic and Republican parties have starkly different visions of what access to abortion in the U.S. should look like. Vice President and Democratic Nominee Kamala Harris has been an outspoken advocate of abortion rights and has thrown her support behind efforts to restore Roe v. Wade’s abortion standards in all states. Former President Donald Trump endorses leaving abortion policy up to states, allowing full bans to stay in effect, although he has also previously said he would consider a 15 or 16-week national ban on abortion. At the state level, voters in up to 11 states will vote on abortion-related ballot initiatives that will shape access to abortion in their states.

This brief provides new information about women’s experiences with abortion, the fallout of overturning Roe v. Wade, women’s knowledge about abortion laws in their states including medication abortion, as well as their opinions on the legality of abortion. The 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey was fielded from May 15 to June 18, 2024, before President Biden withdrew from the 2024 Presidential race, and was developed and analyzed by KFF staff. It is a nationally representative survey of 5,055 women and 1,191 men ages 18 to 64, and the findings in this brief are based on a sample of 3,901 women ages 18 to 49. See the methodology section for detailed definitions, sampling design, and margins of sampling error.

Findings

Women’s Experiences With Abortion

Among women of reproductive age, one in seven (14%) report having had an abortion at some point in their life. Larger shares of Black (21%) and Hispanic (19%) women report having had an abortion compared to 11% of White women (Figure 1). A higher share of women with lower incomes had an abortion (17%) compared to women with higher incomes (13%).

Smaller shares of women living in rural areas report having had an abortion compared to those living in urban/suburban areas (7% vs. 15%, respectively). Many rural women face long travel distances to access abortion services.

Similar shares of Republican women (12%), independent women (15%), and Democratic women (14%) say they have had an abortion. Throughout this brief, partisans include independents who lean to either party, while independents are individuals who say they do not lean toward either political party. Nearly one in 10 women (8%) who currently identify as pro-life say they have had an abortion compared to almost one in five (17%) who currently identify as pro-choice.

Smaller shares of women living in states with abortion bans or gestational limits between 15 and 22 weeks have had an abortion compared to women living in states with gestational limits at or after 24 weeks or without any gestational limits. Even before the Dobbs decision, abortion access was very limited in many of the states that currently ban abortion or have gestational limits before viability. Most of these states had laws restricting access to abortion, including waiting periods, counseling and ultrasound requirements, and insurance coverage restrictions which resulted in the closure of many abortion clinics in the years preceding the Dobbs decision.

Among Women of Reproductive Age, One in Seven Report They Have Had An Abortion

Among women who say they have ever wanted or needed an abortion, 15% (2% of all reproductive age women) report that at some point in their lives, they have wanted or needed an abortion that they did not get (Figure 2). A larger share of Black women (24%) (5% of all Black women of reproductive age) who have ever been pregnant and have wanted or needed an abortion report that they have wanted or needed an abortion they did not get compared to White women (12%) (1% of all White women of reproductive age). When asked why they did not get a wanted or needed abortion, a third (33%) report access and affordability issues, with affordability issues making up the majority of the category. One in five women also identify religious, moral, or societal pressures as the reason why they did not get the abortion, and another 16% say they changed their mind or couldn’t go through with the abortion. One in 10 women say they were too far along to end the pregnancy. Among the women who report ever wanting or needing an abortion they did not get, 31% say they had an abortion at some other time (data not shown).

Over a Third of Women Who Wanted or Needed an Abortion They Did Not Get Identify Access and Affordability as the Reason

In their own words: There are many reasons why someone may not get an abortion. What was the reason you did not get the abortion(s)?

“Unable to afford the procedure and would be reaching [the] point where it would be too late to complete if able.”

“Was a day over the amount of days in order to have an abortion. I waited too long to get it.”

“Changed my mind. Decided to keep the baby but was initially scared and unsure of what to do.”

“I decided I wanted to keep and raise my child despite societal pressures that would advise against it (I was a minor).”

“My family made me feel like I couldn't and I was scared so I followed through with my pregnancy.”

“I was intimidated by the child's father showing up at the clinic.”

“I could not afford to go out of state and had no way out of [the] state.”

“Ended up miscarrying before proceeding with appointment.”

“I was too far along in the pregnancy when I found out I was pregnant”

“Religious reasons. We are Catholic and it's not an option for us.”

“The service wasn't easily accessible to me, and my partner's family pressured me into having the child.”

“Guilt, moral compass”

“Nurse convinced me not to get it.”

“I could not afford it at the time and unsure if I really wanted to do it.”

“Family pressure, difficulty finding a place to perform an abortion.”

“I lived an hour and a half from the location and my ride didn’t show up.”

The Impact of Overturning Roe

Two years after the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion, 14 states have banned abortion, and 11 states have implemented gestational restrictions between 6 and 22 weeks LMP (last menstrual period). Nationally, 8% of reproductive age women say they personally know someone, including themselves, who has had difficulty getting abortion care since Roe was overturned due to the restrictions in their state (Figure 3). Larger shares of Hispanic women (11%) than White women (8%) report knowing someone who has experienced difficulty getting an abortion. Similarly, larger shares of women living in states with abortion bans (13%) and women living in states with gestational limits between 6 and 12 weeks (11%) report knowing someone who has experienced difficulty compared to women living in states with gestational limits at or after 24 weeks or without gestational limits (6%). Even in states with few abortion restrictions, access to abortion services can be limited by lack of providers, poor coverage, and other factors.

Nearly One in 10 Women of Reproductive Age Know Someone Who Has Had Difficulty Getting an Abortion Since  Roe v. Wade Was Overturned

Among those who say they know someone (including themselves) who had difficulty getting abortion care since Roe was overturned, the majority report they (or the person they knew) had to travel out of state (68%) (Figure 4). Women with higher incomes who say they or someone they know had difficulty accessing abortion care are more likely to report that they or the person they know had to travel out of state compared to women with lower incomes (75% vs. 62%). Many abortion patients living in states with abortion bans or restrictions have to travel to neighboring states to get abortion care, while others may need to travel farther.

Among women who say they or someone they know had difficulty accessing abortion, four in ten women say they or a person they know did not know where to go when trying to get an abortion (40%), three in ten women say they could not afford the cost (35%), and nearly three in ten say they had to take time off work (28%).

Since Roe was Overturned, Travel, Cost, and Lack of Knowledge About Where to Go are Leading Reasons for Difficulty in Getting an Abortion

When asked about women’s ability to get abortion services in their state, more than half of women residing in states with abortion bans (57%) and over four in ten women in states with gestational limits say it is difficult to access abortion care in their state (Figure 5). Notably, one in five (21%) women residing in states with gestational limits at or after 24 weeks or without gestational limits say it is difficult to get abortion services in their state. While abortion may not be restricted, limitations on Medicaid and insurance coverage of abortion, the scarcity of abortion providers in rural communities, stigma, and other factors (such as the need to take time off from work and childcare costs) are still barriers to abortion.

Nationally, Over One Third of Women Say It Is Difficult to Get Abortion Services in Their State

Over six in ten reproductive age women in the U.S. (63%) are concerned that they or someone close to them would not be able to get an abortion if it was needed to preserve their life or health (Figure 6). While all states with abortion bans and abortion restrictions have an exception in their law to “prevent the death” or “preserve the life” of the pregnant person, six states with abortion bans or early gestational restrictions do not have health exceptions. In general, health exceptions have often proven to be unworkable except in the most extreme circumstances. The abortion policies in these states are generally unclear about how ill or close to death a pregnant person would have to be to qualify for the exception.

With the exception of Republican women, a majority of reproductive age women in all subgroups report that they are very or somewhat concerned about access to abortion if it was needed to preserve their life or health. Larger shares of Asian or Pacific Islander women (75%) than White women (61%) are concerned, and smaller shares of women residing in rural areas (52%) are concerned compared to those residing in urban/suburban areas (65%). Compared to Democratic women (78%), smaller shares of women who identify as independent (61%) are concerned that they or someone close to them would not be able to get an abortion if it was needed to preserve their life or health; however, less than half of Republican women report being somewhat or very concerned (41%).

More Than Six in Ten Reproductive Age Women Are Concerned That They or Someone Close to Them Would Not Be Able to Get an Abortion if it Was Needed to Preserve Their Life or Health

Similarly, over 6 in 10 (64%) reproductive age women say they are concerned that abortion bans may affect the safety of a potential future pregnancy for themselves or someone close to them (Figure 7). Across most subgroups—except across party affiliation— majorities of women say that they are somewhat or very concerned. Four in ten (39%) Republican women say they are concerned about the impact of abortion bans on the safety of potential pregnancies for themselves or someone close to them, compared to almost eight in 10 Democratic women and six in 10 independent women.

More Than Six in Ten Reproductive Age Women Are Concerned That Abortion Bans May Affect the Safety of a Future Pregnancy for Themselves or Someone Close to Them

Nearly one in five women (17%) of reproductive age report they have changed their contraceptive practices as a result of Roe being overturned. Larger shares of Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic women report they started to use birth control (9%, 10%, and 7%, respectively) compared to White women (3%) (Table 1). A higher share of Asian or Pacific Islander women report that they have switched to a more effective method of birth control compared to White women (6% vs. 3%), and 7% of Hispanic women report that they have gotten emergency contraception to have on hand compared to 4% of White women.

Nearly One in Five Women Report That They Have Changed Their Contraceptive Practices as a Result of the Overturn of Roe

Awareness of Abortion Availability and Policy

Nationally, most women of reproductive age are unaware of the status of abortion legality in the state they live in. While 45% can correctly describe the status of abortion in their state, 23% of reproductive age women could not answer correctly and another third (33%) say they are not sure (Figure 8). Awareness is highest among women who live in states where abortion is fully banned (51%) or in states with gestational limits at or after 24 weeks or without bans (47%). Smaller shares of women living in states with gestational limits at 15 to 22 weeks (33%) and limits at 6 to 12 weeks (38%) are aware of the status of abortion in their state. Consistently across state abortion groupings, about a third of women say they are not sure on the status of abortion in their state.

Only 4 in 10 Women Correctly Describe the Status of Abortion in The State They Live

One in four (26%) women of reproductive age in the U.S. report that if they needed or wanted an abortion in the near future they would not know where to go or where to find the information (Figure 9). A quarter of women say they would know where to go for an abortion and half (49%) say they would not know where to go, but would know where to find that information. Since the Dobbs decision, websites like abortionfinder.org and ineedana.com provide individuals seeking abortion services with directories of abortion clinics and services that provide medication abortion via telehealth.

Over a third of Hispanic women (37%) and a third of Black women (33%) report that if they wanted or needed an abortion in the near future, they wouldn’t know where to find information compared to 23% of White women. More women with lower incomes (37%) and women living in rural areas (35%) report they wouldn’t know where to go or find that information compared to women with higher incomes (19%) and women living in urban/suburban areas (25%). Over four in 10 (43%) women living in states where abortion is banned say they wouldn’t know where to find information compared to 17% of women in states with gestational limits at or after 24 weeks or without gestational limits. Women living in banned states seeking abortion services must either travel out of state or obtain medication abortion drugs from companies that will ship pills without requiring a clinician visit or from clinicians practicing in states with shield-laws, which offer clinicians a measure of legal protection from attempts by law authorities in abortion ban states to enforce bans in states that support abortion access.

A Quarter of Women Say They Wouldn't Know Where to Get an Abortion or Where to Find the Information if They Needed an Abortion in the Near Future

In the United States, medication abortion is the most common abortion method. It involves taking two different medications, mifepristone and misoprostol, and it has been approved by the FDA to end pregnancies up to 10 weeks gestation. Two-thirds (67%) of women of reproductive age report that they have heard about medication abortion (Figure 10). While still majorities, relatively smaller shares of Asian or Pacific Islander (62%), Black (64%), and Hispanic (59%) women report having heard about medication abortion compared to White women (72%). Similarly, smaller shares of women with lower incomes (60%) have heard about medication abortion compared to women with higher incomes (74%). Compared to women who identify as pro-choice (72%) and women who are Democrats (77%), smaller shares of women who identify as pro-life (56%) or are Republican/Republican leaning (62%) or independents (60%) report hearing of medication abortion.

Most Reproductive Age Women Have Heard of Medication Abortion

The majority of women are unsure of the legal status of abortion in their state. While neither mifepristone nor misoprostol are explicitly banned in any state and the drugs can still be used for miscarriage management treatment, their use for abortion is banned in the 14 states with abortion bans. Medication abortion, for the purposes of abortion, is legal in all states with gestational restrictions as well as states without any limits, but is not legal to use for abortion after the state’s gestational limit (for example, after 6 weeks LMP in Iowa, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina).

The majority of women of reproductive age are unclear about the legal status of medication abortion in their state, regardless of the legal status of abortion in their state (Figure 11). A larger share of women living in states with gestational limits at 24 weeks or without gestational limits (43%) report that medication abortion is legal in their state compared to women living in states with gestational limits between 6 to 12 weeks (19%) and gestational limits between 15 to 22 weeks (18%). Among women living in states where abortion is banned, 6% say medication abortion is legal in their state and 27% say it is illegal. Regardless of the status of abortion in their state of residence, majorities of women of reproductive age are not aware of the legal status of medication abortion in their state or have never heard of medication abortion.

Regardless of Abortion Legality in Their State, the Majority of Women of Reproductive Age Are Unclear of the Legal Status of Medication Abortion

Overall, only one in five (19%) women of reproductive age are aware that medication abortion pills are available online. Since state abortion bans and restrictions have gone into effect, new online services have been created that sell medication abortion pills through online organizations. Among women of reproductive age, 10% say individuals in their state cannot get medication abortion pills online and about three-quarter (71%) were unsure or had never heard of medication abortion (Figure 12). Small shares of women living in states where abortion is banned or states with gestational limits know that people in their states can get medication abortion pills online compared to women living in states without any gestational limits or limits after 24 weeks.

Only One in Five Women are Aware that People in Their State Can Get Medication Abortion Pills Online

Opinions on Abortion Policy

Three in four (75%) women of reproductive age in the United States, the age group that is most directly impacted by state abortion policies, think that abortion should be legal in most or all cases—38% say legal in all cases and 37% legal in most cases. Only 8% of women say that abortion should be illegal in all cases. This trend is consistent with prior polls which have found that the majority of Americans believe that abortion should be legal.

Across various subgroups, except those who identify as Republican or pro-life, majorities of reproductive age women think abortion should be legal in all or most cases. Among those ages 18 to 49, over eight in 10 Black women (83%) and Asian or Pacific Islander women (83%), and almost three-quarters of Hispanic women (73%) and White women (72%) think abortion should be legal (Figure 13). In contrast, slightly less than half (48%) of Republican women of reproductive age think abortion should be legal, 36% say abortion should be illegal in most cases and 17% say abortion should be illegal in all cases. Not surprisingly, among women who identify as pro-life, 74% say that abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, but one in four (25%) believe that abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Three Quarters of Reproductive Age Women Think Abortion Should Be Legal in Most or All Cases

Seven in ten reproductive age women (70%) support a law guaranteeing a federal right to abortion, with half (50%) saying they strongly support this (Figure 17). While similar shares of Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White reproductive age women support a nationwide right to abortion, support varies widely by income, urbanicity, and party affiliation (Figure 14). Though still a majority, smaller shares of reproductive age women with lower incomes (64%) and women who live in rural communities (62%) support a nationwide right to abortion compared to their urban/suburban (71%) and higher income counterparts (74%). Support is strongest among Democratic (84%) women, but two thirds (64%) of women who identify as independents and nearly half of Republican women (48%) strongly or somewhat support establishing a federal right to abortion. More than three times as many Democrats (71%) than Republicans (22%) strongly support a law that would guarantee this right.

More than half of all women of reproductive age support a law establishing a nationwide right to abortion, regardless of the abortion status in their state of residence. While there are smaller shares of support among women who reside in states with bans and gestational limits before viability, over four in 10 women in these states strongly support a law guaranteeing a federal right to abortion.

Majority of Women Ages 18 to 49 in the U.S. Support a Law Establishing a Nationwide Right to Abortion

On the issue of abortion, former President Trump has previously said he would consider a national ban at 15 or 16 weeks, a position also proposed by other Republican elected officials. Overall, six in ten women of reproductive age (63%) oppose a law that would establish a nationwide ban on abortion at 15 weeks (Figure 15). While still a majority, smaller shares of those with lower incomes (58%) and those who reside in rural areas (55%) oppose a national abortion ban at 15 weeks. Six in ten women in states with abortion bans and gestational limits before viability oppose a national ban on abortion at 15 weeks.

Majority of Women Oppose A Law Establishing a Nationwide Ban on Abortion at 15 Weeks

Most recently, former President Trump announced he supports leaving abortion policy up to the individual states, allowing the current bans and restrictions to stay in effect across half the country. Overall, nearly three in four women of reproductive age (74%) oppose this approach (Figure 16). Similar shares of Asian (72%), Black (75%), Hispanic (75%), and White (72%) reproductive age women oppose leaving abortion policy up to the states. Compared to their counterparts, larger shares of women with higher incomes (76%) and those who live in urban/suburban communities (74%) oppose having states decide whether abortion should be legal or illegal in their states.

At least half of all women oppose this approach regardless of party affiliation, but opposition is highest among Democratic women (88%). While there is slight variation in support/opposition by abortion status in a woman’s state of residence, over two thirds of those in states with abortion bans and gestational limits oppose leaving the legality of abortion up to individual states.

Nearly Three in Four Women Oppose Leaving It Up to the States to Determine the Legality of Abortion

Appendix

Characteristics of Survey Respondents

Methodology

The 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey was designed and analyzed by women’s health researchers at KFF. The survey was conducted from May 13 - June 18, 2024, online and by telephone among a nationally representative sample of 6,246 adults ages 18 to 64, including 3,901 women ages 18 to 49. Women include anyone who selected woman as their gender (n = 3,867) or who said they were non-binary (n = 26), transgender (n = 4), or another gender (n = 3) and chose to answer the female set of questions with regard to sexual and reproductive health. The project includes oversamples of women ages 18 to 49 in Arizona (n = 298) and Florida (n = 512). Sampling, data collection, weighting, tabulation, and IRB approval by the University of Southern Maine’s Collaborative Institutional Review Board were managed by SSRS of Glenn Mills, Pennsylvania in collaboration with women’s health researchers at KFF.

Throughout the reports of findings, we refer to “women”. This includes respondents who said their gender is “woman,” plus those who said their gender is “transgender,” or “non-binary,” or another gender and that they prefer to answer the survey’s set of questions for females. We followed this approach to try to include as many people as possible but recognize that some people who need and seek abortion and other reproductive health care services may not be represented in the findings or identify as women.

The national sample as well as the samples in Arizona and Florida were drawn from two nationally representative probability-based panels: the SSRS Opinion Panel and the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. The SSRS Opinion Panel is a nationally representative probability-based panel where panel members are recruited randomly in one of two ways: (a) Through invitations mailed to respondents randomly sampled from an Address-Based Sample (ABS) provided by Marketing Systems Groups (MSG) through the U.S. Postal Service’s Computerized Delivery Sequence (CDS); (b) from a dual-frame random digit dial (RDD) sample provided by MSG. For the online panel component, invitations were sent to panel members by email followed by up to five reminder emails. 5,276 panel members completed the survey online and panel members who do not use the internet were reached by phone (175). Another 970 respondents were reached online through the Ipsos Knowledge Panel to help reach adequate sample sizes among subgroups of interest, specifically women ages 18 to 49. This panel is recruited using ABS, based on a stratified sample from the CDS. The questionnaire was translated into Spanish, so respondents were able to complete the survey in English or Spanish.

The national sample was weighted by splitting the sample into three groups: [1] Women 18-49, [2] Women 50-64, and [3] Men 18-64 and each group was separately weighted to match known population parameters (see table below for weighting variables and sources). Weights within the three groups were then trimmed at the 4th and 96th percentiles, to ensure that individual respondents do not have too much influence on survey-derived estimates. After the weights were trimmed, the samples were combined, and the weights adjusted, so that the groups were represented in their proper proportions for a final combined, gender by age-adjusted weight. Lastly, two additional weights for interviews among women 18-49 in Arizona and Florida were calculated for analyses among those specific sub-groups. Each of the state-specific weights were trimmed at the 2nd and 98th percentiles, to ensure that individual respondents do not have too much influence on survey-derived estimates.

DimensionsSource
AgeCPS 2023 ASEC
Education
Age by Education
Age by Gender
Census Region
Race/Ethnicity by Nativity
Home Tenure
Civic EngagementCPS 2021 Volunteering & Civic Engagement Supplement
Internet FrequencySSRS Opinion Panel Database 2024
Population DensityACS 206-2020 5-year data
NEP RegionsCensus Planning Database 2022
Voter RegistrationCPS 2022 Voting & Registration Supplement

The margins of sampling error for the national sample of reproductive age women, Arizona reproductive age women, and Florida reproductive age women are plus or minus 2 percentage points, 8 percentage points, and 6 percentage points respectively. Numbers of respondents and margins of sampling error for key subgroups are shown in the table below. For results based on other subgroups, the margin of sampling error may be higher. Sampling error is only one of many potential sources of error and there may be other unmeasured error in this survey.

 GroupN (unweighted)M.O.S.E.
National Women Ages 18-493901± 2 percentage points
White, non-Hispanic1856± 3 percentage points
Black, non-Hispanic603± 5 percentage points
Hispanic963± 4 percentage points
Asian286± 7 percentage points
<200% FPL1667± 3 percentage points
200%+ FPL1974± 3 percentage points
Pro-life1074± 4 percentage points
Pro-choice2815± 2 percentage points
Republican/Republican-leaning1076± 4 percentage points
Democrat/Democrat-leaning1803± 3 percentage points
Urban/Suburban3379± 2 percentage points
Rural473± 6 percentage points
Lives in a state where abortion is banned857± 4 percentage points
Lives in a state where abortion has gestational limits 6-12 weeks819± 5 percentage points
Lives in a state where abortion has gestational limits 15-22 weeks594± 6 percentage points
Lives in a state where gestational limited are 24+ weeks or none1631± 3 percentage points
Arizona Women Ages 18-49298± 8 percentage points
<200% FPL121± 12 percentage points
200%+ FPL162± 10 percentage points
Florida Women Ages 18-49512± 6 percentage points
White, non-Hispanic229± 9 percentage points
Hispanic155± 11 percentage points
<200% FPL182± 10 percentage points
200%+ FPL297± 8 percentage points
Pro-life143± 12 percentage points
Pro-choice366± 7 percentage points
Republican/Republican-leaning169± 11 percentage points
Democrat/Democrat-leaning231± 9 percentage points

 

Women and Abortion in Arizona: Findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey

Published: Aug 14, 2024

Findings

Key Takeaways

  • Among women ages 18 to 49 in Arizona, 15% say they have had an abortion at some point in their lives.
  • Women in Arizona are concerned about the impact of abortion restrictions on health and safety. Over six in ten (64%) are very or somewhat concerned that a ban may affect the safety of a potential future pregnancy for them or someone close to them, and 69% express concern that they or someone close to them would not be able to obtain an abortion if it was needed to preserve their life or health.
  • Awareness of abortion availability is limited among reproductive age women in Arizona. Nearly six in ten (58%) have heard of medication abortion, but just over one in ten are aware that it is legal in the state and can be obtained online.
  • Women with lower incomes in Arizona, who are disproportionately affected by restrictions on abortion, have lower awareness about abortion access in their state and greater concerns about pregnancy safety.
  • Substantial majorities of reproductive age women in Arizona think abortion should be legal in all or most cases (70%), support a nationwide right to abortion (66%), and oppose leaving abortion policy to the states (67%).

Introduction

Many people across the nation are watching the state of Arizona in the 2024 election. Arizona is considered a swing state in the Presidential contest between Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee. President Biden won the state in 2020 with a narrow <1% margin. Vice President Harris has been outspoken in support of abortion access in all states and is expected to campaign heavily on the topic, while former President Trump claims credit for appointing Supreme Court justices that overturned Roe v. Wade, allowing states to ban abortion completely and restrict it before fetal viability. This year, the state also has a widely watched Senate race that could tip the very slim margin the Democrats currently hold in the Senate, another important factor in abortion access, as the next President is likely to nominate multiple federal judges and possibly at least one Supreme Court justice.

The election comes at the end of a tumultuous year in Arizona, during which the state’s Supreme Court decided to reinstate a law from the Civil War era that would have outlawed all abortions with nearly no exceptions. After much public outrage at the ruling and debate within the state, the legislature passed a bill repealing the 1864 law which the governor signed, effectively nulling the state Supreme court decision. The status quo remains in place, and currently, abortion is legal up to 15 weeks’ gestation in Arizona. However, the state will have a ballot measure on abortion legality in this year’s election that, if passed, would make abortion legal in the state up to viability, generally considered around 24 weeks gestation (See Box).

This brief provides information about abortion experiences, awareness, and attitudes of Arizona women ages 18 to 49, based on findings from the 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey, a nationally representative survey on health care issues, developed and analyzed by KFF, fielded from May 13 to June 18, 2024, before President Biden withdrew from the 2024 Presidential campaign. This analysis is based on survey responses from 298 women ages 18 to 49 in Arizona. The data for Arizona were weighted to represent women ages 18 to 49 in the state, based on benchmarks from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey. One half of women ages 18 to 49 in Arizona have incomes below 200% of the federal poverty level (FPL), 44% are White, 39% are Hispanic, and 7% are Black (Figure 1). See the methodology section for more information on definitions, sampling design, and margins of sampling error.

Figure 1 is titled "Selected Characteristics of Reproductive Age Women in Arizona" and shows three pie charts breaking down the demographic categories of Race/Ethnicity, Income, and Party ID.

Findings

Women’s Experiences with Abortion

Among women ages 18 to 49 living in Arizona, 15% say they have had an abortion at some point in their life. Another 52% of reproductive age women in the state have been pregnant and not had an abortion, and one-third of women have never been pregnant (Figure 2).

Among Reproductive Age Women in Arizona, 15% Say They Have Had An Abortion at Some Point in Their Life

Almost half of reproductive age women in the state say that it is difficult to obtain an abortion in the state. When asked about the ability to obtain abortion services in their state, 46% of reproductive age women say it is somewhat or very difficult (Figure 3). One in ten describe it as very or somewhat easy, and a sizable share (44%) say they don’t know. Additionally, more than one in ten (13%) say that they personally know someone who has had difficulty obtaining an abortion since Roe was overturned. State policies on abortion, as well as cost, insurance coverage, availability of services, knowledge and awareness all play a role in women’s ability to find and obtain abortion care.

Nearly Half of Reproductive Age Women in Arizona Say it Is Difficult to Obtain Abortion Care in the State

On the Ballot: Arizona Abortion Access Act (Proposition 139)

Abortion rights advocates in Arizona certified enough signatures in the state to include a measure on the 2024 ballot that would amend the state’s constitution to protect abortion up to viability and in cases when needed to protect the life or health of the pregnant person. A majority (50%) of voter approval is needed for passage.

Most women in Arizona are concerned about the impact of abortion restrictions on health and safety for themselves and loved ones. The safety of pregnancy has come squarely into the limelight since the Dobbs ruling, with multiple high profile cases of pregnant people suffering major complications yet being denied abortion care because of bans in their states that do not allow abortions even in cases of emergencies when the pregnant person’s health is threatened. All states have exceptions to their abortion bans and restrictions to preserve the life of a pregnant person, and some states also have exceptions to preserve the health of the pregnant person or for pregnancy resulting from rape or incest. However, these exceptions are narrow, vague, and have been hard to interpret, with many clinicians unable to determine when someone is sick enough that their life is on the line. As a result, there are multiple lawsuits pending over the conflict between abortion bans and the federal requirement for hospitals to provide all patients with lifesaving and stabilizing emergency medical care. Arizona’s 15-week limit allows exceptions for life and health but does not have exceptions for cases of rape and incest.

About seven in ten (69%) Arizona women say they are very or somewhat concerned that they or someone close to them would not be able to obtain an abortion if it was needed to preserve their life or health (Figure 4). Similarly, about two-thirds (64%) are concerned that a ban may affect the safety of a potential pregnancy in the future for them or someone close to them. Notably, higher shares of women with lower incomes express concerns about the impact of abortion bans on safety and health for pregnant people compared to women with higher incomes (Figure 5).

More Than Six in Ten Arizona Women are Concerned About Impact of Abortion Access on Safety for Pregnancy
More Women With Lower Incomes Are Concerned About Impact of Abortion Restrictions on Health and Safety

Overturning of Roe has affected contraceptive practices among some Arizona women. One in five (20%) Arizona women say that since the ruling, they or their partner have changed a contraceptive practice, such as starting contraception, switching to a more effective method, having their tubes tied or getting a vasectomy, or obtaining emergency contraception. This is similar between women of different income levels - 21% of women with incomes less than 200% FPL and 16% of women with higher incomes report a change in contraception practices (data not shown).

Awareness of Abortion Availability and Policy

Awareness of abortion availability is limited among reproductive age women in Arizona. Abortion is legal in Arizona through 15 weeks gestation, but most women in the state are not aware of this (Figure 6). When asked to describe the status of abortion policy in their state, nearly one in ten (7%) incorrectly think that abortion is available with few restrictions, and another one in three believe that abortion is generally unavailable with few exceptions. Four in ten say they don’t know. Only one in five (21%) women of reproductive age in Arizona say correctly that abortion is available but limited to earlier in pregnancy. However, there is a significant difference in awareness between women in different income levels. Three in ten women with incomes above 200% of the FPL answer correctly, twice the share of women with lower incomes (15%).

Most Reproductive Age Women in Arizona Do Not Know the Status of Abortion Policy in Their State

Awareness of abortion policy has been variable in Arizona because of the extreme uncertainty resulting from a state supreme court ruling earlier in the year that would have reinstated an 1864 law banning all abortions in the state. Following that ruling, there was widespread publicity that if it had taken effect, abortion would be banned under nearly all circumstances. The state legislature revoked the law before it went into effect, and abortion remains legal up to 15 weeks gestation. The state policy may change in the future if voters in the state approve the upcoming ballot initiative to legalize abortion up to viability, generally considered around 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Four in ten reproductive age women in Arizona say they would not know where to get an abortion if they needed one and wouldn’t know where they could find the information. For many women, finding abortion care is not easy. Abortion is an unplanned health care need, there are limited clinicians offering care in many areas, stigma has limited conversation, education and openness about abortion, and there is also extensive misinformation and active censorship of abortion information in many venues.

In recent years, and particularly since the Dobbs decision, there are more websites like Plan C and ineedana.com that provide directories of local abortion clinics, information about companies that offer telehealth appointments, and links to websites to purchase pills without a clinician visit.

However, this information may not necessarily be reaching everyone. One in ten women say they know where they could get an abortion if they needed one in the near future, and another 47% say they could find the information (Figure 7). Yet, four in ten (42%) do not know where to go or how to find the information.

More Than Four in Ten Reproductive Age Women in Arizona Say They Wouldn't Know Where to Obtain an Abortion or Find the Information if They Needed One

About six in ten reproductive age women in Arizona have heard of medication abortion pills. More than 20 years ago, the FDA approved the use of the medication mifepristone for abortion through 10 weeks gestation. Since then, medication abortion has become the most common method of abortion in the country. In recent years, there has been greater attention on medication abortion, with many conservative and anti-choice leaders opposing its use and trying to implement restrictions. In 2023-2024, the U.S. Supreme Court heard a case about the approval process of medication abortion. While there was no ruling in that case, access to medication abortion continues to be discussed in the courts, among federal and state policymakers, and in the media.

More than half (58%) of reproductive age women in Arizona say they have heard of medication abortion (Figure 8), lower than the national share (67%). There is also less awareness among women with lower incomes, with just over half (53%) saying they have heard of medication abortion, compared to seven in ten women with higher incomes (69%).

Lower Shares of Women in Arizona Have Heard of Medication Abortion, Especially Women with Lower Incomes

Few reproductive age women in Arizona know that medication abortion is legal in the state and that pills can be obtained online. Medication abortion can be used through 10 weeks of pregnancy, which is within Arizona‘s gestational limit of 15 weeks, so it is legal in the state. Yet just over one in ten (14%) of reproductive age women in the state are aware that it is legal. A similar share (15%) erroneously believe it is illegal, and seven in ten (71%) don’t know if it’s legal or haven’t heard of it (Figure 9).

Women in Arizona seeking medication abortion pills can obtain them from a clinician in person. Additionally, websites like Plan C, ineedana.com, and AbortionFinder provide information about online clinics and websites that sell medication abortion pills online and mail them to all states in the U.S. However, just about one in ten (11%) reproductive age women in Arizona know that medication abortion pills can be obtained online. Over one in ten (14%) say that this is not an option for women in the state, and three in four are not sure or haven’t heard of medication abortion.

Few Women in Arizona Know that Medication Abortion Pills are Legal in the State and Can be Obtained Online

Opinions on Abortion Policy

The majority of reproductive age women in Arizona think abortion should be legal in all or most cases (Figure 10). Seven in ten women ages 18 to 49 in Arizona say that abortion should be legal in all cases (30%) or most cases (40%) (Figure 10). Conversely, three in ten women say abortion should be illegal in all (9%) or most cases (21%). This is similar to women in the United States, three quarters of whom say abortion should be legal and 26% who think it should be illegal in all or most cases.

Currently, abortion is legal up to 15 weeks gestation in Arizona. Beyond that time, abortion is allowed only in the event of medical emergencies. The upcoming ballot initiative on abortion would protect the right to abortion up to viability if approved. A previous KFF survey found that two-thirds of women voters in the state support the initiative and that six in ten (58%) say they would be more motivated to vote in the election if the measure appears on the ballot.

Seven in Ten Women in Arizona Think Abortion Should be Legal in All or Most Cases

The majority of women in Arizona support a nationwide right to abortion and oppose leaving abortion policy to the states. In this year’s election, Vice President Harris and leaders in the Democratic party support reinstating the standards of Roe v. Wade, which provided a nationwide right to abortion up to viability before it was overturned by the Dobbs decision. The majority of Arizona women are in favor of a national right, with two-thirds (66%) of women ages 18 to 49 in Arizona saying they strongly or somewhat support a law that would establish a nationwide right to abortion (Figure 11).

In contrast, former President Trump and the newly revamped Republican party platform support leaving it up to states to decide whether abortion is legal, which two-thirds (67%) of Arizona women oppose. Six in ten Arizona reproductive age women (61%) also oppose a nationwide ban on abortion after 15 weeks gestation, a position promoted by some Republican lawmakers, including former President Trump, at times. When looking at women in different income groups, one in five (21%) women of reproductive age with incomes above 200% of the FPL say they strongly support a national ban at 15 weeks, but a majority (58%) still strongly or somewhat oppose this policy.

Majority of Reproductive Age Women in Arizona Support A Nationwide Right to Abortion and Oppose Nationwide Ban at 15 Weeks or Leaving it up to States

****

Abortion and reproductive health issues will be on the ballot this year in the battleground state of Arizona. Should voters in the state vote to pass the proposed constitutional amendment, abortion access in Arizona would be protected through viability, in line with the platform of the Democratic party and Presidential nominee Kamala Harris. If it does not secure the needed majority, then abortion will remain limited to 15 weeks with the possibility that future state legislatures could vote to roll back the limit to early gestational periods, as has been done in many states across the country.

Methodology

The 2024 KFF Women’s Health Survey was designed and analyzed by women’s health researchers at KFF. The survey was conducted from May 13 - June 18, 2024, online and by telephone among a nationally representative sample of 6,246 adults ages 18 to 64, including 3,901 women ages 18 to 49. Women include anyone who selected woman as their gender (n = 3,867) or who said they were non-binary (n = 26), transgender (n = 4), or another gender (n = 3) and chose to answer the female set of questions with regard to sexual and reproductive health. The project includes oversamples of women ages 18 to 49 in Arizona (n = 298) and Florida (n = 512). Sampling, data collection, weighting, tabulation, and IRB approval by the University of Southern Maine’s Collaborative Institutional Review Board were managed by SSRS of Glenn Mills, Pennsylvania in collaboration with women’s health researchers at KFF.

Throughout the reports of findings, we refer to “women”. This includes respondents who said their gender is “woman,” plus those who said their gender is “transgender,” or “non-binary,” or another gender and that they prefer to answer the survey’s set of questions for females. We followed this approach to try to include as many people as possible but recognize that some people who need and seek abortion and other reproductive health care services may not be represented in the findings or identify as women.

The national sample as well as the samples in Arizona and Florida were drawn from two nationally representative probability-based panels: the SSRS Opinion Panel and the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. The SSRS Opinion Panel is a nationally representative probability-based panel where panel members are recruited randomly in one of two ways: (a) Through invitations mailed to respondents randomly sampled from an Address-Based Sample (ABS) provided by Marketing Systems Groups (MSG) through the U.S. Postal Service’s Computerized Delivery Sequence (CDS); (b) from a dual-frame random digit dial (RDD) sample provided by MSG. For the online panel component, invitations were sent to panel members by email followed by up to five reminder emails. 5,276 panel members completed the survey online and panel members who do not use the internet were reached by phone (175). Another 970 respondents were reached online through the Ipsos Knowledge Panel to help reach adequate sample sizes among subgroups of interest, specifically women ages 18 to 49. This panel is recruited using ABS, based on a stratified sample from the CDS. The questionnaire was translated into Spanish, so respondents were able to complete the survey in English or Spanish.

The national sample was weighted by splitting the sample into three groups: [1] Women 18-49, [2] Women 50-64, and [3] Men 18-64 and each group was separately weighted to match known population parameters (see table below for weighting variables and sources). Weights within the three groups were then trimmed at the 4th and 96th percentiles, to ensure that individual respondents do not have too much influence on survey-derived estimates. After the weights were trimmed, the samples were combined, and the weights adjusted, so that the groups were represented in their proper proportions for a final combined, gender by age-adjusted weight. Lastly, two additional weights for interviews among women 18-49 in Arizona and Florida were calculated for analyses among those specific sub-groups. Each of the state-specific weights were trimmed at the 2nd and 98th percentiles, to ensure that individual respondents do not have too much influence on survey-derived estimates.

DimensionsSource
AgeCPS 2023 ASEC
Education
Age by Education
Age by Gender
Census Region
Race/Ethnicity by Nativity
Home Tenure
Civic EngagementCPS 2021 Volunteering & Civic Engagement Supplement
Internet FrequencySSRS Opinion Panel Database 2024
Population DensityACS 206-2020 5-year data
NEP RegionsCensus Planning Database 2022
Voter RegistrationCPS 2022 Voting & Registration Supplement

The margins of sampling error for the national sample of reproductive age women, Arizona reproductive age women, and Florida reproductive age women are plus or minus 2 percentage points, 8 percentage points, and 6 percentage points respectively. Numbers of respondents and margins of sampling error for key subgroups are shown in the table below. For results based on other subgroups, the margin of sampling error may be higher. Sampling error is only one of many potential sources of error and there may be other unmeasured error in this survey.

 GroupN (unweighted)M.O.S.E.
National Women Ages 18-493901± 2 percentage points
White, non-Hispanic1856± 3 percentage points
Black, non-Hispanic603± 5 percentage points
Hispanic963± 4 percentage points
Asian286± 7 percentage points
<200% FPL1667± 3 percentage points
200%+ FPL1974± 3 percentage points
Pro-life1074± 4 percentage points
Pro-choice2815± 2 percentage points
Republican/Republican-leaning1076± 4 percentage points
Democrat/Democrat-leaning1803± 3 percentage points
Urban/Suburban3379± 2 percentage points
Rural473± 6 percentage points
Lives in a state where abortion is banned857± 4 percentage points
Lives in a state where abortion has gestational limits 6-12 weeks819± 5 percentage points
Lives in a state where abortion has gestational limits 15-22 weeks594± 6 percentage points
Lives in a state where gestational limited are 24+ weeks or none1631± 3 percentage points
Arizona Women Ages 18-49298± 8 percentage points
<200% FPL121± 12 percentage points
200%+ FPL162± 10 percentage points
Florida Women Ages 18-49512± 6 percentage points
White, non-Hispanic229± 9 percentage points
Hispanic155± 11 percentage points
<200% FPL182± 10 percentage points
200%+ FPL297± 8 percentage points
Pro-life143± 12 percentage points
Pro-choice366± 7 percentage points
Republican/Republican-leaning169± 11 percentage points
Democrat/Democrat-leaning231± 9 percentage points

 

News Release

Medicare Advantage Plans Denied a Larger Share of Prior Authorization Requests in 2022 Than in Prior Years

Published: Aug 8, 2024

Medicare Advantage plans denied 3.4 million prior authorization requests for health care services in whole or in part in 2022, or 7.4% of the 46.2 million requests submitted on behalf of enrollees that year, according to a new KFF analysis of federal data.

That was a higher share of denials than in recent years. The share of all prior authorization requests denied by Medicare Advantage plans increased from 5.7% in 2019, 5.6% in 2020 and 5.8% in 2021.

Prior authorization is intended to ensure that health care services are medically necessary by requiring providers to obtain approval before a service or other benefit is covered. While prior authorization has long been used to contain spending and prevent people from receiving unnecessary or low-value services, it also has been subject to criticism that it may create barriers to receiving necessary care. (Traditional Medicare does not require prior authorization except for a limited set of services.)

Prior authorization practices have attracted the attention of the Biden Administration and lawmakers in Congress. The administration recently finalized rules to increase the timeliness and transparency of prior authorization decisions and require Medicare Advantage plans to evaluate the effect of prior authorization policies on people with certain social risk factors. Lawmakers have introduced bills to codify many of these changes into law.

Other key takeaways from the KFF analysis include:

  • Just one in 10 (9.9%) prior authorization requests that were denied were appealed in 2022. That represents an increase since 2019, when 7.5% of denied prior authorization requests were appealed.
  • The vast majority of appeals (83.2%) in 2022 resulted in overturning the initial decision, similar to the shares overturned and in each year between 2019 and 2021.
  • Patients may have different experiences depending on the Medicare Advantage plan in which they are enrolled. The volume of prior authorization determinations varied across Medicare Advantage insurers, as did the share of requests that were denied, the share of denials that were appealed, and the share of decisions that were overturned upon appeal.

Two other KFF analyses released today also examine the latest data about Medicare Advantage.

  • The first provides information and trends about current Medicare Advantage enrollment, by plan type and firm, and by state and county. It shows that in 2024, more than half (54%) of eligible Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicare Advantage. The share of beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage plans varies across states ranging from 2% in Alaska to 63% in Alabama, Connecticut and Michigan. Medicare Advantage enrollment is highly concentrated among a small number of firms, with UnitedHealthcare and Humana accounting for nearly half (47%) of all Medicare Advantage enrollment nationwide.
  • The second companion analysis describes Medicare Advantage premiums, out-of-pocket limits, supplemental benefits offered, and prior authorization requirements. In 2024, three quarters (75%) of enrollees in individual Medicare Advantage plans with prescription drug coverage pay no premium other than the Medicare Part B premium, which is a big selling point for many beneficiaries. Most Medicare Advantage enrollees are in plans that offer supplemental benefits not covered by traditional Medicare, such as vision, hearing and dental. And nearly all Medicare Advantage enrollees (99%) are in plans that require prior authorization for some services.

A Closer Look at Rape and Incest Exceptions in States with Abortion Bans and Early Gestational Restrictions

Authors: Mabel Felix, Laurie Sobel, and Alina Salganicoff
Published: Aug 7, 2024

Since Roe v. Wade was overturned in June 2022, there has been considerable media attention and legal scrutiny of the health and life exceptions to state abortion bans. This may emerge as an election issue as Former President Trump has stated that he supports rape exceptions to abortion bans, but the 2024 Republican party platform says states should decide their own abortion laws – with no mention of exceptions. The vast majority of Americans – about 8 in 10 – support legal access to abortion for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. While rape and incest exceptions have been part of the political debate, the feasibility of accessing abortion care under these exceptions has garnered much less attention.

Despite broad support for legal access to abortion in cases of rape or incest, 10 of the 21 states with abortion bans or gestational limits do not have an exception for pregnancies resulting from sexual assault. In the 11 states with rape and incest exceptions, lack of provider availability, law enforcement reporting requirements, and early pregnancy gestational limits can make access to abortion care unattainable for pregnant survivors of sexual assault (Figure 1).

Rape and Incest Exceptions to State Abortion Bans and Restrictions

Rape and incest exceptions to state abortion bans or gestational limits are often restricted to abortion early in pregnancy. Among the 21 states with abortion bans or early gestational limits, 11 make exceptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest and 10 do not. Of the 14 states with total abortion bans, nine (Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Texas) lack a rape or incest exception. The remaining 5 (Idaho, Indiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, and West Virginia) have exceptions for cases of rape or incest but limit these exceptions to the earlier stages of pregnancy. Most pregnant people discover they are pregnant at 5.5 weeks LMP, though people living on lower incomes, younger people, Black and Hispanic people, and those experiencing unintended pregnancies often discover their pregnancies later. Of the 7 states with overall gestational limits between 6 and 15 weeks LMP, six (Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Nebraska, North Carolina, and South Carolina) have rape or incest exceptions. Arizona does not have a rape or incest exception in its law.

Most rape or incest exceptions require involvement of law enforcement, which can restrict abortion access for those who have become pregnant as a result sexual assault. In 5 of the states with rape or incest exceptions – Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Mississippi, and West Virginia – pregnant people must report the sexual assault to law enforcement before they can receive abortion care. Many of these states additionally require that the pregnant person provide the physician a copy of the report ahead of receiving care. In Iowa, sexual assault survivors must report the incident “to law enforcement or a public or private health agency which may include a family physician”– within 45 days of the incident (140 days for cases of incest). In South Carolina, survivors are not required to report their assault to law enforcement before receiving abortion care, but physicians who perform abortions under the rape/incest exception must report the allegation of sexual assault to the sheriff in the county in which the abortion was provided.

It is estimated that only 21% of sexual assaults are reported. Survivors are often afraid to report sexual violence to the police due to fear of retaliation and the belief that law enforcement would not do anything to help.

These requirements can also delay care. There are no clear guidelines specifying how quickly law enforcement must issue a copy of the report in these states. Advocates argue it is difficult to get a copy of a police report while the sexual assault is still being investigated. Among the states that require law enforcement reporting, only Idaho specifies that survivors of sexual assault are entitled to receiving a copy of the report within 72 hours of making the request.

Pregnant people may face difficulty finding an abortion provider or securing an appointment. In states with total abortion bans, few abortion providers remain. Providers in states with early gestational limits (and the few remaining providers in states with total bans) may be unwilling  to provide abortion care in instances of rape or incest – even when there is an exception – out of fear of prosecution. The sexual assault exceptions often do not specifically outline how physicians can ensure that they will not be prosecuted for providing an abortion that falls under the exceptions. In Idaho, Mississippi, and North Dakota clinics and abortion funds have counseled patients to leave the state to obtain abortion care because they have found that it is easier for people to obtain abortion care out of state than to attempt to receive care in-state under the exception.

It is instructive to consider a hypothetical scenario in West Virginia, an abortion ban state with a rape/incest exception.  The state’s total abortion ban has an exception for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, but only up to 8 weeks LMP (Last Menstrual Period) for adults, typically about 4 weeks after a missed period. Because most people discover they are pregnant at 5.5 weeks LMP, a person who is pregnant as a result of rape or incest in West Virginia typically would have only 2.5 weeks to:

  1. Find and secure and appointment with a physician who is willing and able to provide the abortion
  2. File a report of the assault to law enforcement and retrieve a copy of the report to provide to the physician performing the abortion at least 48 hours before receiving the abortion
  3. Secure sufficient funding to pay for the abortion
  4. Manage other logistical challenges, such as arranging childcare and time off work.

West Virginia’s ban is layered on top of the abortion restrictions implemented before the Dobbs decision: a 24-hour waiting period, mandatory counseling, an ultrasound offer, and for minors, parental or legal guardian notification or a judge’s approval.  The flow chart below shows how tight this timing is. (Figure 2)

Medicaid coverage for abortion care may be inaccessible, even for enrollees who qualify for a rape or incest exception. Although the federal Hyde Amendment requires state Medicaid programs to cover abortions in cases where the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest, many state Medicaid programs impose pre-authorization requirements and medically unnecessary restrictions. As a result, few, if any, pregnant people obtain Medicaid coverage for their abortion care.  For low-income survivors of sexual assault, cost can be an insurmountable barrier to accessing abortion care. In 2021, the median cost of abortion services exceeded $500. However, 43% of women ages 18-49 cannot cover an emergency expense of at least $500 using their current savings, with even larger shares of Black and Hispanic women (57% and 58%, respectively) being unable to cover such an emergency medical expense.

Few people have accessed abortion care under the rape or incest exceptions to state abortion bans. While data from states with abortion bans and exceptions for rape or incest is scant, estimates show that very few abortions are provided in states with total abortion bans, even in those with sexual assault exceptions. For example, Mississippi and Idaho each had 5 documented abortions in 2023, though neither specify the exception under which the abortions were provided. In West Virginia, 23 abortions were provided from January 2023 through June 2024, but none are reported to have been provided under the state’s rape/incest exception. Since Indiana’s total ban went into effect in late August 2023, providers have reported that 5 abortions were provided due to rape or incest.  The true number of pregnancies that result from rape is unknown. Given the extremely low number of abortions states have reported as qualifying for rape exceptions to abortion bans and what is known about the high rates of sexual violence that women experience, it would appear that these exceptions have not provided the level of access to abortion for pregnant rape survivors that the laws presumably are designed to protect.

Gestational Limits and Reporting Requirements in Rape and Incest Exceptions to Abortion Bans

Compare the Candidates on Health Care Policy

A photo illustration with Kamala Harris on a blue background and Donald Trump on a red backgrond

The following content was last updated on October 8, 2024

The general election campaign is underway, spotlighting former President Trump, the Republican nominee, and Vice President Harris, the Democratic nominee, as the viable contenders for the presidency. Although health care reform may not be a central issue in this election as in the past, health care remains a significant concern for voters. Trump and Harris have distinctly different records and positions on health care. This side-by-side analysis provides a quick resource for understanding Trump’s presidential record and Harris’ record in the Biden-Harris administration and in previously held public office, as well as their current positions and proposed policies. Proposals are from when candidates served as president and vice president respectively unless text or links indicate otherwise. This tool will be continuously updated as new information and policy details emerge throughout the campaign.

Affordable Care Act


  • In 2017, unsuccessfully attempted to repeal and replace the ACA with various plans that would have increased the number of uninsured Americans to 51 million
  • Deprioritized enforcement of the individual mandate penalty, then reduced the penalty to $0. 
  • Stopped payments for cost-sharing subsidies (CSRs), which contributed to premiums increasing, as well as federal subsidies growing. 
  • Reduced funding for outreach, which may have contributed to enrollment stagnating
  • Expanded non-ACA-compliant short-term plans, which restrict coverage for pre-existing conditions.  
  • Allowed Enhanced Direct Enrollment in ACA plans through online brokers. 
  • In budget plans, proposed changes to the ACA that would weaken pre-existing protections and reduce funding substantially through a block grant to states. 
  • As a candidate for this election, he called to “never give up” on repealing the ACA, later adding “Obamacare Sucks” and that he would replace it with “much better healthcare.” He also said he was not running on terminating the ACA and would rather make it “much much better and far less money,” though has provided no specific plans.  
  • The Biden-Harris administration enacted the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), which temporarily expanded eligibility for and increased ACA Marketplace subsidies. These were extended by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) through 2025. 
  • The administration fixed the “family glitch,” allowing dependents of people with unaffordable employer-based family coverage to receive ACA subsidies. 
  • The administration reversed Trump administration expansion of short-term plans and restored outreach and enrollment assistance and funding. 
  • The administration achieved record-high enrollment in ACA Marketplace plans. 
  • Proposes to build on provisions in the IRA by making permanent the expanded ACA subsidies.   

Medicaid


  • Supported unsuccessful efforts to repeal and replace the ACA, including the Medicaid expansion, and proposed restructuring Medicaid financing into a block grant or a per capita cap as well as limiting Medicaid eligibility and benefits. These proposals, included in Trump budget plans as president, were estimated to reduce federal Medicaid spending by roughly $1 trillion over 10 years.  
  • Approved waivers that included work requirements as a condition of Medicaid eligibility, premiums, and other eligibility restrictions.  
  • Took administrative action to relax Medicaid managed care rules and increase eligibility verification requirements. 
  • Signed legislation that included a continuous enrollment requirement in exchange for enhanced federal Medicaid funding during the COVID-19 public health emergency. 

GO DEEPER: What the Outcome of the Election Could Mean for Medicaid

Abortion


  • Takes credit for overturning Roe v. Wade by appointing three anti-choice judges to the Supreme Court, claiming, “After 50 years of failure, with nobody coming even close, I was able to kill Roe v. Wade.” 
  • Has said he would consider a national 15 or 16-week ban on abortion, but more recently has said he supports leaving abortion policy to states, which allows full bans to stay in effect  and tweeted that he would veto a federal abortion ban. Supports exceptions in cases of rape, incest, and to save the life of the pregnant woman.
  • Has stated that he would generally not use the Comstock Act to ban mail delivery of medication abortion pills, but will be coming out with specifics.
  • Administration issued regulations that blocked clinicians from providing counseling that includes abortion information or referrals in clinics that receive federal Title X family planning funds.    
  • Reinstated and expanded Mexico City Policy prohibiting U.S. global health funds from going to foreign NGOs that perform or promote abortions. 
  • As an outspoken defender of reproductive rights and the leading voice of Biden-Harris administration’s stance on abortion, has highlighted the harmful impacts from the Dobbs ruling and advocated for protecting abortion access, including for travel, privacy, emergency care, and bodily autonomy.  
  • As part of national “Fight for Reproductive Freedoms” tour, the only vice president or president to visit a Planned Parenthood clinic while in office.
  • Supports a federal law to restore Roe v. Wade’s national standard of abortion legality up to viability and has also stated she supports eliminating the Senate filibuster to do this.  
  • The administration’s FDA revised restrictions on medication abortion pills, allowing dispensing via certified pharmacies and telehealth. 
  • The administration issued guidance affirming that abortions performed to stabilize the health of people experiencing pregnancy-related emergencies are protected by the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), even in states that ban abortions.
  • The administration has defended abortion access and the administration’s actions in two major Supreme Court cases on medication abortion and emergency abortions.
  • The administration strengthened HIPAA protections for data privacy, added nondiscrimination protections for people seeking abortion care, and defends right to travel to seek abortion. 
  • The administration revoked Trump’s Mexico City Policy restrictions.
  • As U.S. senator, opposed Hyde Amendment, co-sponsored Women’s Health Protection Act, which would have blocked states from imposing restrictive policies limiting access to abortion, and voted against a bill that would have banned abortions later in pregnancy.
  • As attorney general in California, supported state’s Reproductive FACT Act, requiring so called crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) to post information about availability of free and low-cost contraceptives and abortion services in the state.
  • During 2020 primary, while Roe v. Wade was still in place, proposed a pre-clearance requirement that states trying to pass pre-viability abortion restrictions must obtain federal approval.

Contraception


  • Prohibited family planning clinics such as Planned Parenthood that also offer abortion services (with separate funding) from receiving funds from the federal Title X family planning program, leading to the disqualification or departure of approximately 1000 sites – about 25% of participating clinics. 
  • Issued regulations allowing nearly any employer with a religious or moral objection an exemption from the ACA’s contraceptive coverage requirement.   
  • Approved Texas’s Medicaid program waiver blocking Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood and other clinics for non-abortion family planning services and excluding coverage of emergency contraceptive pills in state’s family planning program. 
  • Supports ACA and its contraceptive coverage requirement and Biden-Harris administration defended challenge to the preventive services requirements in the Braidwood case. 
  • The administration restored rules of federal Title X family planning program requiring participating entities to offer full range of contraceptives, pregnancy options counseling (including abortion referral), and re-allowing clinics that also offer abortion services (with non-federal funds) to qualify for the program.
  • The administration’s FDA approved first over-the-counter oral contraceptive pills and supports increased access and full coverage
  • Supports policies to expand access to contraceptives for military members and dependents.

GO DEEPER: Harris v. Trump: Records and Positions on Reproductive Health

Maternity Care


  • Signed the Preventing Maternal Deaths Act of 2018 which provided funding for state, local, and tribal maternal mortality review committees, and administration implemented the Maternal Opioid Misuse (MOM) model to improve care for pregnant and postpartum women with opioid use disorder
  • Supports access to IVF care and would require insurance companies or the government to cover all costs (without detailing implementation or funding), but party platform includes language about 14th Amendment, which many legal experts believe could threaten IVF access
  • As a longtime leader on maternal health, she championed Congressional bills to improve pregnancy care and reduce racial and ethnic disparities. This includes extension of Medicaid coverage to one year postpartum (enacted under the Biden-Harris Administration). The Administration issued a Blueprint on maternal health that set cross-agency priorities, including workforce development, enhanced data collection, mental health, and doula coverage
  • Supports guaranteed right to IVF and spoke out against the Alabama Supreme Court ruling

LGBTQ Health


  • Worked to restrict or remove LGBT rights and access to health care. 
  • Issued revised regulations on Section 1557 of the ACA removing protections in health care based on gender identity and sexual orientation.  
  • Created Division of Conscience and Religious Freedom at HHS and issued final conscience regulation broadening nondiscrimination protections for health care entities to include conscience and executive order directing federal agencies to expand religious protections, actions that created opportunities for LGBTQ-based discrimination in certain circumstances.  
  • Removed and sought to curtail data collection on sexual orientation and gender identity in federal surveys.  
  • Proposes to prohibit gender-affirming care for young people and limit for people of any age nationwide, including prohibiting the use of federal funds for these services.  
  • Made campaign commitment to work to pass the Equality Act which would provide non-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people.
  • Worked to expand and protect LGBTQ rights and access to health care as attorney general of California, as a U.S. senator from California, and through the Biden-Harris administration.
  • As attorney general of California, supported marriage equality, which has implications for health care access.
  • As U.S. senator, Harris:  introduced a bill seeking to include LGBTQ identity in the U.S. Census, which has implications for identifying health care trends for the population; cosponsored The Health Equity and Accountability Act and the Equality Act, bills seeking to promote equity, access, and data collection, including in health care for LGBTQ people, among others; and introduced the PrEP Access and Coverage Act, a bill aiming to increase access to PrEP, an HIV prevention medication.
  • The Biden-Harris administration issued guidance and regulations on Section 1557 of the ACA providing the broadest protections to date in health care based on gender identity and sexual orientation, for transgender people, and for gender-affirming care. 
  • The administration enacted the Respect for Marriage Act, enshrining the right for same-sex couples to marry into law.
  • The administration modernized FDA restrictions on blood donation to align with risk rather than identity.
  • The administration issued regulation providing protections for LGBTQ people in HHS grants and services.
  • The administration rescinded Trump administration regulatory expansions of conscience regulations that had created potential opportunities for LGBTQ-based discrimination (which multiple federal courts had found to be unlawful). 
  • The administration intervened, through DOJ, to support plaintiffs in lawsuits challenging state bans on youth access to gender-affirming care and has requested SCOTUS review of the state law.
  • The administration issued executive order seeking to advance equity for LGBTQ people
  • The administration adopted a Federal Evidence Agenda on LGBTQ Equity and an HHS-wide action plan promoting sexual orientation and gender identity data collection and equity in federal programs and surveys. 

Gun Violence


  • Banned bump stocks in response to the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting, though the ban has since been overturned by the Supreme Court. His campaign stated, “The Court has spoken and their decision should be respected.”
  • Reversed Obama-era regulations that required those eligible for Social Security Administration mental disability payments to be blocked from buying guns and made it easier for gun-safety devices to be more widely accessible.
  • Asked the Supreme Court to overturn New York City’s restrictions on transporting handguns in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York, New York.
  • On multiple occasions, has suggested that armed citizens could stop mass shootings, including after the Pulse nightclub shooting stating, “you wouldn’t have had the tragedy that you had.” At times, he has partially walked back this suggestion.
  • Has frequently attributed community gun violence and violent crime to both mental illness and immigration, stating that “they’re not humans, they’re animals.”
  • Trump is a gun owner and has stated in the past that he “always carries a gun.
  • Wants to implement gun safety laws to reduce gun violence, including red flag laws, universal background checks, and a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. She recently stated, “It is a false choice to suggest that you’re either in favor of the Second Amendment or you want to take everyone’s guns away. I’m in favor of the Second Amendment and we need an assault weapons ban.”
  • Disagreed with the recent Supreme Court decision to overturn the banning of bump stocks, used in the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting at a music festival. In a statement after the decision, she called on Congress to ban bump stocks immediately.
  • As vice president oversees the newly established White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, which aims to address gun violence by partnering directly with states and encouraging them to institute their own gun violence prevention offices.
  • The Biden-Harris administration supported and signed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act into law, which enhanced background checks for individuals under 21, funds crisis intervention orders, and invests in mental health services, including school-based mental health services.
  • The administration issued executive actions to reduce gun violence, including rules to curb the proliferation of “ghost guns,” reclassify some firearms to require stricter regulation, and promote the use of Extreme Risk Protection Orders or “red flag laws.”
  • The administration launched cross-jurisdictional strike forces to reduce illegal firearm trafficking in key regions affected by gun violence and stepped up enforcement against firearm dealers who sold firearms illegally or did not abide by background check requirements.
  • Through both executive action and the American Rescue Plan Act, the administration funded and supported local public safety and community violence prevention programs.
  • As a presidential candidate in 2019, Harris shared that she owned a gun for personal safety, but also called for “reasonable gun safety” laws.

Public Health


  • Despite creating Operation Warp Speed, which successfully developed effective COVID-19 vaccines within record time, and initially promoting vaccines, regularly questioned science and public health. 
  • Consistently downplayed COVID-19 as a health threat and routinely countered federal agency and expert advice on pandemic response, including on school re-openings, testing, and masking. Touted the use of unproven therapies such as hydroxychloroquine and suggested that applying ultraviolet light to or inside the body, or injecting disinfectant, could combat coronavirus. 
  • Delegated most responsibility for the COVID-19 response to the states, with the federal government serving as “merely a back-up” and “supplier of last resort.”   
  • Proposed significant budget cuts to CDC and other federal public health programs. 
  • Has vowed to “stop all COVID mandates” and said he would cut federal funding to schools with a “vaccine mandate or a mask mandate.”  
  • Said he “probably would” disband the White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy, established by Congress in 2023.  

Prescription Drug Prices


  • Established a voluntary model allowing participating Medicare Part D plans to limit monthly insulin costs to $35 (in effect from 2021 through 2023). 
  • Created a new pathway to allow states to import prescription drugs from Canada. 
  • Proposed to eliminate drug rebates in Medicare Part D, which was projected to increase Part D premiums and Medicare spending while lowering out-of-pocket costs (implementation subsequently delayed by legislation until 2032). 
  • Proposed to establish a “Most Favored Nation” system of international reference prices for some Medicare-covered drugs, where U.S. prices would be based on prices in certain other countries (blocked by court action and later rescinded), and to require drug manufacturers to disclose drug prices in television ads (blocked by court ruling). According to the 2024 Trump campaign, “There is no push to renew the most favored nations drug pricing policy.” 
  • Proposed several Medicare Part D benefit design changes, including an out-of-pocket cap and weaker formulary standards (proposals not implemented). 
  • As vice president, cast the tiebreaking vote in the U.S. Senate for the Inflation Reduction Act, which requires the government to negotiate prices for some Medicare-covered drugs (with the number growing over time), requires drug companies to pay rebates if prices rise faster than inflation, caps out-of-pocket drug spending, limits monthly insulin costs to $35 for Medicare beneficiaries in Part B and all Part D plans, improves financial assistance for low-income beneficiaries, and other changes. 
  • Proposes to accelerate Medicare price negotiation of drugs (the Democratic platform calls for 50 drugs per year) and extend $35 insulin copay cap and drug out-of-pocket cap to all Americans. Also stated she will increase competition and transparency, starting with cracking down on pharmaceutical companies blocking competition and abusive practices of drug middlemen. 
  • The administration approved Florida’s plan to import some prescription drugs from Canada; implementation contingent on further action by Florida. 
  • The administration delayed implementation of the Trump administration’s drug rebate rule until 2032, which will delay projected increases in Medicare spending. 
  • The administration established a voluntary model to increase access to cell and gene therapies for people with Medicaid. 

Medicare


  • Biden-Harris administration proposes to “protect Medicare for future generations” in part by extending solvency of the Medicare Part A Trust Fund by raising Medicare taxes on high earners and closing tax loopholes, and proposes to expand Medicare and Social Security (details not specified). 
  • Proposes expanding home care services under Medicare to help people with functional or cognitive impairments (see also Long-term Care), and adds a vision and hearing benefit to Medicare, paid for by expanding Medicare drug negotiations and other policies.
  • As vice president, cast the tiebreaking vote in the U.S. Senate for the Inflation Reduction Act, which included several provisions to lower Medicare prescription drug expenses, including negotiated drug prices and a $35 monthly insulin cap (see also Prescription Drug Prices). 
  • The administration expanded coverage of mental health services and access to additional mental health providers. 
  • The administration extended broader coverage of telehealth through December 2024. 
  • The administration established new rules for Medicare Advantage insurers, including restrictions on prior authorization and marketing practices. 
  • The administration established new staffing requirements for Medicare-certified nursing facilities (see also Long-Term Care). 
  • During the 2019 Democratic presidential primary, supported a Medicare for all approach with a role for private insurance, however her campaign has since indicated she would not seek to advance Medicare for all as president and has supported the ACA and expansions to broaden coverage and make health care more affordable.

Health Care Costs


  • Signed the bipartisan No Surprises Act into law, protecting patients from unexpected medical bills when receiving out-of-network care unknowingly. 
  • Issued an executive order on price transparency, leading to a rule requiring hospitals to post negotiated charges for their services online using authority from the ACA.
  • Proposed establishing a “Most Favored Nation” system of international reference prices for some Medicare-covered drugs. However, this was blocked by court action and later rescinded. According to the 2024 Trump campaign, “There is no push to renew the most favored nations drug pricing policy.” 
  • Supported efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, and in 2024 says he would make the ACA much less expensive (more details in ACA section). 
  • On his 2024 campaign site, he vows to continue his earlier efforts regarding surprise medical bills, price transparency, and prescription drug prices. He also promises to lower health insurance premiums but does not provide details on how he plans to do so. 
  • The administration challenged anticompetitive behavior, including health care mergers. Approved, with conditions, a merger between CVS Health and Aetna, one of the largest health care mergers in history.
  • Proposes to work with states to cancel medical debt for millions of Americans. In June 2024, Harris announced an administration proposal to remove medical debt from credit reports of 15 million Americans and encouraged state and local governments to act to reduce the burden of medical debt.
  • In 2021, the Biden-Harris administration began implementing the No Surprises Act, establishing processes to determine payments for out-of-network bills and resolving payment disputes. The administration also proposed expanding surprise billing protections to ground ambulance providers.
  • The administration expanded the Trump-era rules on price transparency to address implementation challenges and enforce the legislation.
  • The administration supported the Inflation Reduction Act empowering Medicare to negotiate prices for certain drugs with pharmaceutical companies & increase subsides for ACA marketplace plans (more details in Prescription Drug Prices section).
  • The administration issued an executive order promoting competition, released updated merger guidelines, and has challenged anticompetitive behavior in the health care sector.  As attorney general of California, joined lawsuits against health care mergers and laid the groundwork for an antitrust case against Sutter Health that settled for $575 million in 2019.

Mental Health


  • Proposes a return to mental institutionalization, stating, “for those who are severely mentally ill and deeply disturbed, we will bring them back to mental institutions, where they belong” — moving away from longstanding policies that provide treatment and living in community settings. 
  • Supported repeal of the ACA and cuts to Medicaid, which would reduce coverage and access to behavioral health services, and issued an executive order to expand non-ACA-compliant short-term policies that often limit or exclude mental health services.
  • Signed pandemic legislation (CARES Act) that included an expansion of Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs), signed legislation that established the 988 hotline, and issued an executive order on veteran suicide.   

Opioid Use Disorders


  • Declared the opioid crisis a public health emergency, signed bipartisan legislation (SUPPORT Act)
  • 2024 campaign proposes a heavier-handed law and order response to opioids, including reviving restrictive border policies, increasing federal law enforcement involvement in local drug investigations, and seeking the death penalty for drug smugglers and drug dealers.  
  • Plans to support faith-based substance use treatment and job placement but emphasizes a forceful approach for homeless people with mental health and substance use needs, stating ending “the nightmare of the homeless, drug addicts, and dangerously deranged” by arresting or relocating individuals to “tent cities” staffed with health workers on large parcels of inexpensive land. 
  • The Biden-Harris administration established a multi-pronged response to the opioid epidemic, including reducing the supply of illicit substances like fentanyl, launching educational and awareness campaigns like “One Pill Can Kill” to raise awareness about fentanyl and emerging threats like xylazine, and improving prevention and access to evidence-based treatment.
  • The administration reduced barriers to medications for opioid use disorder by updating regulations for methadone dispensing programs to improve access, extending temporary rules that allow buprenorphine administration via telehealth, adding substance use treatment training requirements for providers, removing provider registration requirements prescribing treatment medication, and permanently requiring state Medicaid plans to cover medication-assisted treatment (through the 2024 Consolidated Appropriations Act). The administration extended funding for state and tribal opioid response grants to support states in distributing opioid overdose medication and continuing initiatives that increase access to opioid treatment services and medication.
  • The administration expanded access to medication treatment in correctional settings by allowing states with approval to use Medicaid funds for addiction treatment services up to 90 days before release and by updating regulations that improve access to methadone treatment in jails and prisons.
  • Following the FDA’s approval of over-the-counter opioid overdose reversal medication under the administration, the White House established the Challenge to Save Lives from Overdose, which is a nationwide initiative to increase training on overdose reversal and improve availability of overdose reversal medication in public and private organizations across all sectors

Long-term Care


  • Proposes to protect seniors by “shifting resources back to at-home Senior Care,” addressing disincentives that contribute to workforce shortages, and supporting unpaid family caregivers through tax credits.
  • Issued regulations relaxing oversight for nursing facilities, including removing the requirement to employ an infection preventionist.  
  • Suspended routine inspections in nursing facilities during early months of COVID-19.  
  • Launched the Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program to facilitate COVID-19 vaccinations in facilities with residents ages 65+. 
  • Issued guidance to delay the implementation of the “Settings Rule,” which established new protections for people using Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS). 
  • Proposes expanding home care services under Medicare to help people with functional or cognitive impairments, paid for by expanding Medicare drug negotiations and other policies.
  • Proposes to partner with private technology companies to expand remote patient monitoring and telehealth and strengthen the home-care workforce.
  • Proposes working with Congress to end Medicaid estate recovery, a practice in which the state recoups the costs of Medicaid LTSS from the home and estates of deceased enrollees; or using administrative action to expand the circumstances in which families may be exempted.
  • Biden-Harris administration required reporting of COVID-19 vaccination rates in nursing facilities.   
  • The administration promoted newly established minimum staffing requirements for nursing facilities, including other requirements to support nursing facility workers; issued regulations to increase transparency of private equity ownership of nursing facilities. 
  • The administration enacted legislation increasing federal funding for Medicaid HCBS; proposed $400 billion in new Medicaid funding for HCBS; established requirements to increase access to Medicaid HCBS, promote higher payment rates for home care workers, and reduce the time people wait for services. 

Global Health


  • Pursued an “America First” approach to foreign policy, including for global health, prioritizing sovereignty and disengaging from multilateral agreements.  
  • Halted U.S. funding for the World Health Organization and initiated a process to withdraw U.S. membership in the organization. 
  • Significantly expanded the Mexico City Policy to apply to virtually all U.S. bilateral global health funding. When in place, the policy requires foreign NGOs to certify that they will not “perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning” using funds from any source as a condition of receiving U.S. funding. 
  • Chose not to join COVAX, the global initiative to distribute COVID-19 vaccines. 
  • Proposed eliminating/significantly reducing funding for most US global health programs in multiple Presidential budget requests; ended funding for United Nations Family Planning Agency (UNFPA). 
  • Dissolved the National Security Council’s stand-alone Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense, moving its functions into other parts of the NSC. 
  • Supported extending the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) initiative for an additional five-year period. 
  • Biden-Harris administration promotes international cooperation and alliances in foreign policy and global health. 
  • The administration reversed decision to withdraw from WHO and restored U.S. funding for the organization. 
  • The administration rescinded the Mexico City Policy that was expanded under Trump.  As a Senator, Harris co-sponsored bills to permanently repeal the policy.
  • The administration restored funding for UNFPA.  
  • The administration released a National Security Memorandum and Executive Order that positioned global health as “top national security priority.” 
  • The administration joined COVAX and committed to the U.S. being the largest donor of COVID-19 vaccines globally.  
  • The administration re-established the NSC Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense. 
  • The administration created new, elevated Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy at the State Department. 
  • The administration supported WHO-based negotiations to develop a new pandemic agreement and to revise the International Health Regulations.  
  • The administration updated and expanded the U.S. Global Health Security Strategy. 

Immigrant Health Coverage


  • Issued regulatory changes to public charge policies that newly considered the use of non-cash assistance programs, including Medicaid, in public charge determinations for people seeking to enter the U.S. 
  • Issued a proclamation suspending entry of immigrants into the United States unless they provided proof of health insurance
  • Rescinded the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, but the Supreme Court ruled the rescission unlawful in 2020. 
  • Biden-Harris administration rescinded the Trump administration’s public charge changes and, in 2022, issued regulations that largely codified 1999 guidance, which exclude the use of non-cash assistance programs, including most Medicaid coverage, from public charge determinations. 
  • The administration revoked the Trump administration’s proclamation that suspended entry of immigrants unless they provided proof of health insurance. 
  • The administration Issued regulations that extend Marketplace eligibility to DACA recipients, which is estimated to lead to 100,000 DACA recipients gaining coverage.  

Proposals by Trump to carry out mass deportations of millions of immigrants and executive action by both the Biden-Harris administration and by the Trump administration to have stricter border enforcement may increase fears among immigrant families, making them reluctant to access health coverage and care. 

Topics: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Senate Committee on Appropriations Approves FY 2025 Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies (Labor HHS) Appropriations Bill & Accompanying Report

Published: Aug 5, 2024

The Senate Committee on Appropriations approved its FY 2025 Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies (Labor HHS) appropriations bill, accompanying report, and amendments on August 1, 2024. The Labor HHS appropriations bill includes funding for U.S. global health programs provided to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and funding for global health research activities provided to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Total global health funding at CDC and NIH through the Labor HHS bill is not yet known, as funding for some programs at NIH is determined at the agency level rather than specified by Congress in annual appropriations bills. Funding for global health programs at CDC totals $698 million, which is $4.8 million (1%) above the FY24 enacted and President’s FY25 request level ($693 million) and $134 million (24%) above the House level ($564 million). Funding for parasitic diseases and global public health protection at CDC increased while all other program areas, including the Fogarty International Center at NIH, remained flat compared to the FY24 enacted amounts. See the table below for additional detail on global health funding. See other budget summaries and the KFF budget tracker for details on historical annual appropriations for global health programs.

KFF Analysis of Global Health Funding in the FY25 Senate Labor Health & Human Services (Labor HHS) Appropriations Bill