NYT Opinion Piece Examines Benefits, Risks Of Using Wolbachia-Infected Mosquitoes To Reduce Transmission Of Mosquito-Borne Diseases
New York Times: It Takes a Mosquito to Fight a Mosquito
Tina Rosenberg, co-founder of the Solutions Journalism Network
“…For much of the world, a mosquito bite can mean serious illness or death from malaria, yellow fever, chikungunya, Zika, and dengue. … But now there’s a new response: We can create good mosquitoes — those infected with bacteria that block or greatly reduce transmission of disease — and use them to vanquish the bad ones. … [I]n 2011, the World Mosquito Program at Monash University in Melbourne began releasing good mosquitoes in [Townsville, Australia, where dengue is not endemic but it had been possible to catch it when travelers from other countries imported the virus.] … Imported cases of dengue kept rising in Townsville during the mosquito releases. But local transmission of dengue virtually stopped. … What’s a good mosquito? It’s one infected with bacteria called Wolbachia. … Researchers in a variety of locales enduring tropical diseases are testing several ways to employ Wolbachia. The World Mosquito Program aims to replace the local mosquito population with a Wolbachia-infected population, the infected mosquitoes forming a larger and larger proportion of the total with each generation. … The program’s strategy of replacing bad mosquitoes with good ones has some disadvantages as well. … Any time we play God with nature, we need to worry about the consequences…” (1/8).
The KFF Daily Global Health Policy Report summarized news and information on global health policy from hundreds of sources, from May 2009 through December 2020. All summaries are archived and available via search.