Views and Experiences with End-of-Life Medical Care in Japan, Italy, the United States, and Brazil: A Cross-Country Survey

Four-Country Comparison: Five Key Takeaways

  1. Despite the demographic and cultural differences between these four countries, there are some common themes that emerge from the survey results. For example, in each country surveyed a majority say their government is not well-prepared to deal with the aging population, and residents are more apt to give their health care system a negative rating than a positive one when it comes to providing end-of-life care. In another area of commonality, majorities in all four countries express a preference to die at home, but fewer say they expect to die at home than say that is their wish. Large majorities across countries also feel that doctors should be completely honest with seriously ill patients, regardless of their prognosis.
  2. When asked about priorities for health care at the end of people’s lives, majorities across three of the four countries (Japan, Italy, and the U.S.) prioritize reducing pain and stress over extending life as long as possible. Similarly, when asked what is important in thinking about their own death, “living as long as possible” ranks last on a list of seven possible factors in these three countries. Brazil stands out as an exception on these measures, with a larger share placing a priority on extending life, both in general and for themselves personally.
  3. When it comes to discussing and planning for the end of life, majorities across countries say death is a subject that is generally avoided rather than something people feel free to talk about. However, the U.S. stands out from other countries, with higher shares reporting having conversations with loved ones about their end-of-life wishes and having these wishes written down.
  4. About one in five adults in each country surveyed say they were involved in helping to make medical decisions for a loved one who died in the past five years. Acting as a medical decision-maker for someone who died appears to influence people’s own personal end-of-life preparations; in Japan, the U.S., and Brazil, those who served as a medical decision-maker for someone else are more likely to say they’ve had a serious conversation with a loved one about their own end-of-life wishes, and to have those wishes in a written document.
  5. While most of those who experienced the death of a loved one report positive experiences overall, some negative reports are not uncommon. Majorities across countries say their loved one’s wishes about medical care were followed, that their spiritual and religious beliefs were respected, and that they died with friends or family present. Still, substantial shares of those who experienced the death of a loved one (particularly in Japan and Brazil) say the person experienced more pain than was necessary (about four in ten in Brazil, about three in ten in Japan, and a quarter in the U.S. and Italy) or that they did not have access to appropriate medical treatments for prolonging life (about four in ten in Japan and Brazil, one-third in Italy, and 18 percent in the U.S.). About one in five of those experiencing the death of a loved one across countries say their loved one received medical care that placed an undue burden on the patient’s family.
Overview Key Findings Across Countries

KFF Headquarters: 185 Berry St., Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94107 | Phone 650-854-9400
Washington Offices and Barbara Jordan Conference Center: 1330 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005 | Phone 202-347-5270 | Email Alerts: | |

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news, KFF is a nonprofit organization based in San Francisco, California.