Medical Liability Reforms: Comparison of the Candidates’ Proposals


Medical Liability Reforms: Comparison of Candidate’s Proposals



  • Supports a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages and a reasonable cap on punitive damages.
  • Supports limiting a party’s share of total damages to their proportionate share of blame for the injury inflicted.
  • Supports action to allow providers to review best practices without fear of litigation.
  • Opposes capping damages.
  • Supports limiting lawsuits to cases where a qualified specialist determines a reasonable claim exists.
  • Supports sanctions for claims and defenses without merit, including the loss of lawyers’ ability to file these suits.
  • Supports requiring non-binding mediation before a lawsuit can be brought.
  • Supports punitive damages only for intentional misconduct, gross negligence or reckless indifference to life.


KFF Headquarters: 185 Berry St., Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94107 | Phone 650-854-9400
Washington Offices and Barbara Jordan Conference Center: 1330 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005 | Phone 202-347-5270 | Email Alerts: | |

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news, KFF is a nonprofit organization based in San Francisco, California.