Any Proposed U.S. Multilateral Aid Review Should Focus On ‘Traditional’ Aid, Compare Similar Types Of Funding, Expert Says

Center for Global Development’s “U.S. Development Policy”: A Key Question If You Are Reviewing Multilateral Organization Effectiveness: Do We Need a Multilateral Solution?
Charles Kenny, senior fellow at CGD, discusses proposals to institute a multilateral aid review system in the U.S. and how such a system might evaluate various organizations, including Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. He writes, “Perhaps the best choice would be to limit it to apples to apples comparisons: voluntary contributions to organizations that mainly do ‘traditional’ aid of the type that could be delivered either bilaterally or multilaterally. That’s (broadly) the route the British [Multilateral Aid Review (MAR)] took. But if the review has to be broader, it should use different sets of metrics to judge different types of financing…” (3/6).

The KFF Daily Global Health Policy Report summarized news and information on global health policy from hundreds of sources, from May 2009 through December 2020. All summaries are archived and available via search.

KFF Headquarters: 185 Berry St., Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94107 | Phone 650-854-9400
Washington Offices and Barbara Jordan Conference Center: 1330 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005 | Phone 202-347-5270 | Email Alerts: | |

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news, KFF is a nonprofit organization based in San Francisco, California.