STATES FOCUS ON COST CONTAINMENT AS A LOSS OF FEDERAL STIMULUS FUNDS MEANS STATE COSTS FOR MEDICAID WILL JUMP IN FY 2012
New 50-State Survey Finds Cuts In Provider Payments And Changes In Delivery Of Services
WASHINGTON,
D.C. -- Faced with the end of stimulus money and a continuing weak
economy, Medicaid officials in virtually every state are enacting a
variety of cost cutting measures as states’ spending for Medicaid is
projected to increase 28.7 percent this fiscal year to make up for the
loss of federal funds, according to a new survey by the Kaiser Family
Foundation’s Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.
The
substantial but temporary increase in the federal share of Medicaid
spending under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) brought
about the only declines in state spending on Medicaid in the program’s
history in fiscal years 2009 and 2010, even as the deep recession
sharply increased Medicaid enrollment and overall Medicaid spending
during that period. With that money having expired in June 2011,
however, states must ramp up their own spending to replace the lost
funds, even though states project total spending in the Medicaid program
-- which is jointly financed by the federal government and the states
-- to increase on average by a modest 2.2 percent this year.
The
Commission’s 11th annual 50-state Medicaid budget survey captured cost
containment actions ranging from restrictions on payments to providers
and benefits, to new copayments for beneficiaries and additional efforts
to contain the costs of prescription drugs. At the same time, states
are trying to make their programs more efficient by increasing their
reliance on Medicaid managed care, moving long-term care toward
community-based care models, and streamlining enrollment procedures.
Even with such measures, Medicaid officials in more than half the states
estimate at least a 50-50 chance that they will see a budget shortfall
this fiscal year as enrollment continues to grow.
"Unemployment
remains high with increasing numbers of poor and uninsured keeping
pressure on state budgets and Medicaid programs to meet growing needs,"
said Diane Rowland, Executive Vice President of the Kaiser Family
Foundation and Executive Director of the Foundation’s Commission on
Medicaid and the Uninsured. "But the cumulative effect of two recessions
since 2001 and a decade of constrained spending has left no cushion and
many of the latest cuts will hit at the core of the Medicaid program."
The
state focus on cutting costs renews a theme seen much of the last
decade. It occurs against a backdrop of deficit reduction efforts in
Washington that could reduce federal support for Medicaid and shift
costs to state capitols at a time when states are coping with
historically difficult budget conditions and must also lay the ground
work for a significant expansion of Medicaid under the health reform
law.
Cost Containment Efforts A Dominant Theme
Due to
maintenance of effort requirements included in the ARRA and health
reform legislation, states have been prohibited from enacting new
restrictions on Medicaid eligibility or enrollment procedures. Instead
they have turned to other measures that in some cases build on efforts
in play for the last decade, including:
- Provider rate
restrictions. This was the most commonly reported strategy, with 39
states restricting rates in 2011 and 46 reporting plans to do so in
2012. But a number of states also increased or imposed new provider
taxes that can generate more federal matching revenue and help mitigate
the effects of cuts to some providers.
- Benefit reductions and
restrictions. States continued to eliminate, restrict or reduce Medicaid
benefits in areas such as dental, therapies, medical supplies, durable
medical equipment and personal care services. Almost all states have
been making substantial changes in Medicaid pharmacy programs, including
preferred drugs lists, supplemental rebates and prior authorization
requirements and states are now focusing on controlling costs for
specialty drugs, a rising share of prescription drug spending.
- New and higher copayments for beneficiaries. Five states in FY 2011 and
14 states in FY 2012 increased copayment amounts or imposed new
copayments, compared to only one in FY 2010. Most copayment changes were
for pharmacy and emergency room visits, although a few states are
requesting federal waivers to implement broader changes that would have
higher amounts and apply to populations traditionally exempt in federal
law.
Changes In The Delivery of Services
Even amid
strained budgets, states worked to enact reforms to better deliver care
and prepare for health reform, which calls for a major expansion of
Medicaid beginning in 2014. Key areas of change observed in the survey
included:
- Medicaid managed care. Seventeen states in FY 2011
and 24 states in FY 2012 reported expanding their managed care programs,
primarily by expanding the areas and populations covered. Two-thirds of
the nation’s 54 million Medicaid beneficiaries in October 2010 were
enrolled in some form of managed care.
- Dual eligibles. States
are expanding the use of disease and care management programs and
patient centered medical homes to help coordinate care for duals and
other populations with chronic medical conditions. Thirty-seven states
submitted letters of intent to pursue additional opportunities to
coordinate care for duals based on guidance released by the federal
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in July 2011.
- Long-term care. States continued to shift the delivery of long-term
care away from institutions and into community settings. Thirty-two
states in FY 2011 and 33 in FY 2012 expanded long term care services,
primarily by expanding Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Service
programs (HCBS). Most states are still considering whether to adopt new
options in the health reform law designed to increase community-based
long-term care, but six states reported that they are moving forward
with the new options.
Looking Ahead
Although Medicaid
officials were focused on the here and now, they also reported moving
forward to prepare for the major expansion of Medicaid under health
reform. Medicaid directors say the law holds the opportunity to
significantly reduce the number of uninsured, but they also cite several
administrative and fiscal challenges, including tight state budgets and
limited staff and resources to absorb the required new tasks. Medicaid
directors said that their programs are poised for a greater role in
health care delivery and they are committed to assuring access to high
quality care delivered in the most effective manner possible.
The
new survey, Moving Ahead Amid Fiscal Challenges: A Look at Medicaid
Spending, Coverage and Policy Trends, Results from a 50-State Medicaid
Budget Survey for State Fiscal Years 2011 and 2012, was conducted with
Health Management Associates and is available online. Also available are two related
papers - Impact of the Medicaid Fiscal Relief Provisions in the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which examines the impact of the
enhanced federal funding provided by the Recovery Act that expired in
June 2011, and Update on State Budgets in Recession and Recovery, which provides a
brief overview both of the effect of the recent recession on state
budgets as well as the current condition of state budgets as they
continue to recover in the recession’s aftermath.
The Kaiser
Family Foundation, a leader in health policy analysis, health journalism
and communication, is dedicated to filling the need for trusted,
independent information on the major health issues facing our nation and
its people. The Foundation is a non-profit private operating
foundation, based in Menlo Park, California
The Kaiser Commission
on Medicaid and the Uninsured provides information and analysis on
health care coverage and access for the low-income population, with a
special focus on Medicaid’s role and coverage of the uninsured. Begun in
1991 and based in the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Washington, D.C.
office, the Commission is the largest operating program of the
Foundation. The Commission’s work is conducted by Foundation staff under
the guidance of a bipartisan group of national leaders and experts in
health care and public policy.
###