News Release

Half of Parents of Adolescents 12-17 Say Their Child Has Gotten a COVID-19 Vaccine, though Uptake Has Slowed; 16% of Parents of 5-11 Year-olds Say Their Child Has Gotten a Vaccine

Most Parents See COVID-19 as a Greater Risk to their Children than the Vaccines, Though Many Still Lack Confidence in the Vaccines’ Safety for Children

Published: Dec 9, 2021

COVID-19 vaccine uptake among adolescents ages 12-17 has slowed after an initial wave of enthusiasm over the summer, with half (49%) of parents saying their adolescent has received at least one dose, a new KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor report reveals. The share is little changed since earlier in the fall.

Just 1% of parents of adolescents now say they will get their adolescent vaccinated as soon as possible, and 13% say they want to wait and see how it works for others before doing so. Three in ten say they will definitely not get their teen vaccinated. The survey was in the field prior to news of the omicron variant, which could change views.

Parents of children ages 5-11, who became eligible for a COVID-19 vaccine in the past month, remain less eager. About three in ten say that their child already has been vaccinated (16%) or that they plan to get their child vaccinated right away (13%). Nearly a third (32%) say they want to wait and see how it works for other children first, while three in ten (29%) say they will definitely not get their child vaccinated.

There are about 28 million children ages 5-11 and 25 million adolescents ages 12-17 in the United States.

As with adults, there is a large partisan divide in parents’ intentions for their children.

The vast majority (80%) of Democrats say their adolescent child already has gotten vaccinated, while more than half say they’ve already gotten their 5-11 year old child vaccinated (24%) or plan to do so as soon as possible (28%). Just 7% of Democratic parents of children in each age group say they definitely will not get their children vaccinated. 

In contrast, about half of Republican parents say they definitely will not get their 12-17 year old (51%) or 5-11 year old (49%) children vaccinated. Independents fall in between the two groups.

There are about 28 million children ages 5-11 and 25 million adolescents ages 12-17 in the United States.

As with adults, there is a large partisan divide in parents’ intentions for their children.

The vast majority (80%) of Democrats say their adolescent child already has gotten vaccinated, while more than half say they’ve already gotten their 5-11 year old child vaccinated (24%) or plan to do so as soon as possible (28%). Just 7% of Democratic parents of children in each age group say they definitely will not get their children vaccinated. 

In contrast, about half of Republican parents say they definitely will not get their 12-17 year old (51%) or 5-11 year old (49%) children vaccinated. Independents fall in between the two groups.

While Black and Hispanic adults initially were less likely to get vaccinated than White adults, parents of 5-11 year-olds report no significant differences in their intention to vaccinate their child regardless of race or ethnicity. Among parents of adolescents, Hispanic parents (62%) are somewhat more likely than Black (48%) or White (42%) parents to say their teen has been vaccinated.

Though official scientific bodies in the U.S. and worldwide, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, have deemed the vaccines as safe and effective at preventing serious COVID-19 illnesses for adults and school-age children, many parents still have concerns.

About half (52%) are confident in their safety for adolescents and about four in ten (43%) are confident in their safety for 5-11 year old children. This reflects a lower level of confidence in the vaccine’s safety for children than for adults, for which nearly two-thirds (63%) say they are confident in its safety.

When asked whether getting infected by the virus or getting the vaccine poses a bigger risk to their children, more parents of both 12-17 year old adolescents and of 5-11 year old children say they believe getting infected is a bigger risk (57% and 55% respectively). Fewer say the vaccine is a bigger risk (39% and 41% respectively).

However, unvaccinated parents overwhelmingly believe that the vaccine poses a greater risk to their 12-17 year old (80%) and 5-11 year old (71%) children, even though scientific bodies have concluded the opposite is the case. Majorities of Republican parents of children ages 12-17 (61%) and of children ages 5-11 (63%) also believe the vaccines pose a greater risk.

Many Schools Play a Role in Providing Information to Parents and Encouraging Vaccinations

About half (49%) of parents of school-age children say their schools have provided information about how to get a vaccine for their child, and nearly as many (44%) say their school has encouraged parents to get their child vaccinated.

The report finds a relationship between a school’s encouragement and vaccinations.

Among parents of 5-11 year-olds, 28% of those whose schools encouraged vaccinations and 8% of those whose schools did not say that their child has been vaccinated.

Importantly, two thirds (67%) of parents of school-age children say they do not want schools to require all eligible students to get a vaccine, while a third (32%) say they favor such requirements. The vast majority (92%) of Republican parents oppose such a requirement, as do two thirds (67%) of independent parents. A slight majority (55%) of Democratic parents favor a vaccine mandate for eligible students.

The report also notes:

  • Most parents say they don’t have enough information about the effectiveness (58%), side effects (63%), or safety (61%) of the COVID-19 vaccines in children. Groups of parents who are less likely to say they have a vaccinated child – including younger parents, those without college degrees, and Republicans – are more likely to say they don’t have enough information.
  • Hispanic and Black parents are more likely than White parents to express concerns about access to vaccines for their children. For example, among those whose child has not yet been vaccinated, more Hispanic (47%) and Black (43%) than White (23%) parents say they are concerned about having to miss work to take their children to get vaccinated or care for them if they experience side effects.
  • Fewer than half of parents say they talked to their child’s pediatrician about the COVID-19 vaccines. Parents say their pediatricians mostly recommended vaccinations, though 16% of parents with adolescents and 15% of parents with children ages 5-11 say that they spoke to the pediatrician and that the pediatrician did not recommend vaccination.
  • Nearly three quarters (73%) of parents say the pandemic has negatively impacted their children’s education. Almost six in ten (58%) say it has negatively affected their own mental health, and four in ten say it has negatively affected their ability to care for their children. Half of parents say the pandemic has had a negative impact on their ability to afford basic necessities, including higher shares of lower income parents (73%), Hispanic parents (61%), Black parents (59%), and mothers (57%).

Designed and analyzed by public opinion researchers at KFF, this KFF Vaccine Monitor survey was conducted November 8-23 among a nationally representative sample of 1,196 parents with a child under age 18 in their household. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish by telephone (483) and online (713) through a probability-based online panel. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4 percentage points for the full sample of parents, 5 percentage points for parents with a child ages 12-17 and 5 percentage points for parents with a child ages 5-11. For results based on other subgroups, the margin of sampling error may be higher.

The KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor is an ongoing research project tracking the public’s attitudes and experiences with COVID-19 vaccinations. Using a combination of surveys and qualitative research, this project tracks the dynamic nature of public opinion as vaccine development and distribution unfold, including vaccine confidence and acceptance, information needs, trusted messengers and messages, as well as the public’s experiences with vaccination.

Poll Finding

KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor: Winter 2021 Update On Parents’ Views Of Vaccines For Kids

Published: Dec 9, 2021

Findings

Key Findings

  • After an initial wave of eager parents got their teens vaccinated for COVID-19 in the spring and summer, vaccine uptake among 12-17 year-olds appears to have slowed, with about half of parents saying their teen has gotten at least one dose as of November (before news of the omicron variant), essentially unchanged over the past two months. Enthusiasm is somewhat lower among parents of children ages 5-11 who became eligible for vaccination more recently, with 16% saying their younger child has gotten at least one vaccine dose and another 13% saying they plan to get them vaccinated “right away.” Three in ten parents of both teens and younger children say they will “definitely not” get their child vaccinated for COVID-19. The latest KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor survey of parents was conducted prior to the emergence of the omicron COVID-19 variant, and we will continue to track parents’ attitudes and intentions as more information emerges on the potential impact of this new variant on children.
  • Safety and potential side effects continue to be prominent concerns when it comes to parents’ views of COVID-19 vaccines for kids. While about six in ten parents (63%) say they are confident that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe for adults, fewer say they are confident the vaccines are safe for children between the ages of 12 and 17 (52%) and for children ages 5 to 11 (43%). Most parents say getting infected with COVID-19 would be a bigger risk to their child’s health than getting vaccinated. However, majorities of unvaccinated parents and Republican parents believe the vaccine poses a greater risk than the virus itself, even though scientific bodies have concluded the opposite is the case.
  • Access barriers are also a concern for some parents when it comes to getting their children vaccinated. Hispanic parents, Black parents, and those with lower incomes are more likely than other parents to say they are concerned they might have to miss work to get their child vaccinated, that they won’t have a trusted place to go, or that they’ll have difficulty traveling to a vaccination location.
  • Pediatricians remain parents’ most trusted source of information on the COVID-19 vaccine for children, including across partisans and across race and ethnicity. Still, fewer than half of parents of children ages 5 to 17 have talked with their child’s pediatrician or health care provider about the vaccine. Notably, not all pediatricians are recommending that parents get their children vaccinated for COVID-19; among the 40% of parents who spoke with their child’s health care provider, one-third (16% total parents of teens) say the provider did not recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for their teen and four in ten (15% of total parents of 5-11 year-olds) say the doctor did not recommend it for their child ages 5-11.
  • About half of parents of school-age children say their child’s school provided information about how to get their child vaccinated for COVID-19, and more than four in ten say their child’s school encouraged parents to get their children vaccinated. Parents who say their school has encouraged them to get their children vaccinated are more likely to say their child has indeed gotten vaccinated. In fact, parents of 5-11 year-olds whose school encouraged vaccination are four times as likely as those whose school did not encourage vaccination to say their younger child has already gotten the COVID-19 vaccine (28% vs. 7%). While previous KFF Vaccine Monitor reports have shown that a majority of the public supports COVID-19 vaccination requirements for K-12 school teachers, parents oppose schools requiring COVID-19 vaccines for eligible students by a 2-to-1 margin.
  • Parents and families have been particularly hard-hit by the COVID-19 pandemic with nearly three in four of parents (73%) saying the pandemic has had a negative impact on their children’s education, almost six in ten (58%) saying it has negatively impacted their own mental health, and half reporting a negative impact on their ability to pay for basic necessities (50%). The share reporting a negative financial impact is substantially higher among lower-income parents compared to those with higher incomes and among Black and Hispanic parents compared to White parents. In addition, mothers are more likely than fathers to say the pandemic has taken a toll on their financial situation as well as their mental and physical health.

Vaccine uptake among teenagers appears to have stalled over the past two months, with about half (49%) of parents of children ages 12 to 17 saying their teen has gotten vaccinated for COVID-19 and just 1% say they plan to do so “right away,” shares that have held relatively steady since September. About one in eight parents (13%) say they want to wait and see how the vaccine is working for other children before getting their teen vaccinated. Notably, three in ten parents say they will definitely not get their 12-17 year-old vaccinated for COVID-19, while a further 4% say they will only get their teen vaccinated if they are required to do so for school. While the latest KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor indicates a slowing down of vaccine uptake among teens, the survey was conducted prior to the emergence of the omicron COVID-19 variant and as more information emerges on the potential impact of this new variant on children, parents’ attitudes towards vaccinating their teenagers and younger children for COVID-19 may change.

Vaccine Uptake Among 12-17 Year-Olds Has Slowed As About Half Of Parents Say Their Teenager Has Already Gotten At Least One Dose Of The COVID-19 Vaccine

With the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine recently authorized for children between the ages 5 and 11, 16% of parents with children in this age group say their child has gotten vaccinated, and an additional 13% say they plan to get them vaccinated “right away.” Notably, about a third of parents of children ages 5 to 11 say they want to wait and see how the vaccine is working for others before getting their younger child vaccinated. About three in ten parents say they will definitely not get their younger child vaccinated, and a further 7% say they will only do so if their school requires it.

About Three In Ten Parents Say Their 5-11 Year-Old Has Already Received The COVID-19 Vaccine Or Will Do So Right Away

Unsurprisingly, most unvaccinated parents say they will “definitely not” get their 12-17 year-old or their 5-11 year-old vaccinated for COVID-19. Among vaccinated parents, three in four say their 12-17 year-old has already gotten at least one dose of the vaccine. However, when it comes to children ages 5 to 11, vaccinated parents express less enthusiasm, with fewer than half (46%) saying they have already gotten their younger child vaccinated or will do so right away and 39% saying they will wait and see before getting their younger child vaccinated.

Most Unvaccinated Parents Say They Will Definitely Not Get Their Children Vaccinated For COVID-19

As with vaccination attitudes among adults, parents’ intentions for vaccinating their children diverge largely along partisan lines. Among parents of 12-17 year-olds, eight in ten Democrats say their teenager has already gotten at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, compared to about half of independents and just a quarter of Republicans. Indeed, half of Republican parents say they will “definitely not” get their 12-17 year-old vaccinated.

A similar pattern is seen among parents of younger children, with about half of Democrats saying their 5-11 year-old is already vaccinated or will be right away, compared to three in ten independents and about one in ten Republicans. Again, about half of Republican parents say they will “definitely not” vaccinate their younger child. Notably, however, at least three in ten parents of children ages 5-11 across partisan groups say they want to “wait and see” how the vaccine works for other children before getting their child vaccinated.

Across Partisans, About A Third Of Parents Say They Want To Wait And See Before Getting Their 5-11 Year-Old Vaccinated

While early vaccine uptake among adults indicated that people of color were less likely to be vaccinated than White adults, the same pattern does not appear to be emerging among children. In fact, among parents of 12-17 year-olds, Hispanic parents (62%) are somewhat more likely to say their teen is vaccinated compared to either Black parents (48%) or White parents (42%). White parents are substantially more likely than either Black or Hispanic parents to say their teen will “definitely not” get vaccinated.

Among parents of younger children, there are no significant differences by race or ethnicity in parents’ intentions to vaccinate their 5-11 year-old.

About A Third Of Parents Across Racial And Ethnic Groups Want To Wait And See Before Getting Their Younger Children Vaccinated

Parents’ Concerns And Worries About The COVID-19 Vaccine For Children

Parents who have not yet vaccinated their children offer many different reasons why they are not eager to get their child vaccinated. Chief among them is a sense that there is not enough information about the vaccine for children or that more research needs to be done. Many parents also cite concerns about side effects or say they don’t believe the vaccine is necessary for children. For parents of unvaccinated teens, about one in ten cite their child not wanting the vaccine (11%) and their own lack of trust in the vaccine (10%) as the main reason why their teen has not gotten vaccinated for COVID-19.

The Need For More Information And Research About The COVID-19 Vaccine Is The Top Reason Given By Parents On Why They Haven't Gotten Their Children Vaccinated

Parents’ desire for more information and their concerns about the safety and potential side effects of the vaccine are evident when they explain in their own words the main reason why their child has not yet gotten vaccinated. Even among vaccinated parents, these concerns are keeping some of them from getting their child vaccinated right away.

Among vaccinated parents of children ages 5 to 11 who want to wait and see before vaccinating their children: What is the main reason you do not plan to get your 5–11 year-old child the vaccine right away?

“I am nervous because they’re boys and I thought I heard there was an adverse side effect for males,” 38-year-old White mother, Iowa

“I’d rather get it from his pediatrician than from a drive through and pediatrician offices are back logged right now for appointments,” 30-year-old White mother, Texas

“Just the unknown. He's young. Just kind of reading what I can. He's so young. the risk of him getting really sick with vaccine is a hard choice to make,” 36-year-old White mother, Florida

“I feel that children in this age bracket already have had enough vaccinations that I don't know how this new one will respond to her body. All these chemicals are foreign. She has not been sick in the past 2 years. He allergies even cleared up from not being around to many people. Her health is the best ever and I don't want to taint her system if I don't have too,” 44-year-old Black mother, New York

“No one call tell me side effects in the future because there is no long term historical data,” 41-year-old Hispanic mother, New Jersey

“When I took the vaccine, they were sure it will work but then they came up with a booster shot. I don't think they have all the facts and ingredients to make a vaccine that actually works long term. Plus, I think the vaccine was made too quick.” 23-year-old Black mother, Illinois

“I don’t want them to be test subjects to the new stuff. I want to make sure its ok before I let anything endanger my children,” 26-year-old Hispanic mother, New York

While about six in ten parents (63%) say they are “very confident” or “somewhat confident” that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe for adults, they are less likely to express confidence in its safety for children. About half of parents (52%) say they are confident the vaccines are safe for children between the ages of 12 and 17 while about four in ten say they are confident in its safety for children ages 5 to 11 (43%). This lower level of confidence in the vaccine’s safety for children, and especially for younger children, may help explain the more cautious approach parents appear to be taking when deciding on whether to vaccinate their children.

Parents Are Less Likely To Express Confidence That The COVID-19 Vaccines Are Safe For Children

Despite the CDC stating that serious side effects such as myocarditis or severe allergic reactions from the COVID-19 vaccine among children are rare, parents who have not yet gotten their child vaccinated remain concerned about the potential for side effects. Among parents of unvaccinated 12-17 year-olds, about two-thirds (65%) say they are worried their child would experience serious side effects if they got the COVID-19 vaccine. Similarly, about seven in ten parents of unvaccinated 5-11 year-olds say they are worried their younger child would experience serious side effects if they got vaccinated. Notably, even among parents who are themselves vaccinated but have yet to get their child the COVID-19 vaccine, majorities say they are worried their child would experience a serious side effect.

Majorities Of Parents Of Unvaccinated Children Are Worried Their Child Would Experience Side Effects If They Got A COVID-19 Vaccine

Majorities of parents say they do not have enough information about the safety, effectiveness, or side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines in children. The lack of information may be further contributing to parents’ hesitation towards getting their children vaccinated as groups of parents who are less likely to say they have a vaccinated child - younger parents, those without college degrees, Republicans, and unvaccinated parents - are also among the most likely to say they don’t have enough information.

Majorities Of Parents Say They Do Not Have Enough Information On Vaccine Effectiveness, Side Effects, Safety In Children

Among parents of both teens and younger children who are eligible to be vaccinated, a majority say that becoming infected with coronavirus would be a bigger risk to their child’s health (57% among parents of 12-17 year-olds and 55% among parents of 5-11 year-olds), while about four in ten say getting the vaccine is a bigger risk to their child’s health (39% and 41%, respectively). While clear majorities of Black and Hispanic parents see getting infected as bigger risk to their child’s health (particularly among parents of teens), White parents are more split, with nearly half (45%) saying getting the vaccine is a bigger risk for children in both age groups. Not surprisingly, these attitudes also diverge by partisanship and vaccination status, with large majorities of Democrats and vaccinated parents saying getting the virus would be a bigger risk to their child’s health and most Republicans and unvaccinated parents seeing vaccination as the bigger risk.

Most Parents See COVID-19 Infection As A Bigger Risk To Children Than Vaccination, But Republicans And Unvaccinated Parents Feel Differently

Access Barriers To Vaccinating Children

While concerns and worries about the safety and potential side effects of the vaccines in children are prominent among parents, barriers to accessing the vaccine are also an issue for some parents. Among parents of unvaccinated children between the ages of 5 and 17, about three in ten (31%) are concerned about having to take time off work to get their child vaccinated, about one in five (22%) are concerned about not having a trusted place to go, and one in six (17%) are concerned about difficulty traveling to a site to get their child vaccinated. Black and Hispanic parents are more likely than White parents to say they are worried about each of these barriers to access. Similarly, parents with lower household incomes are more likely than those with higher incomes to express these concerns.

Black, Hispanic, And Lower Income Parents Most Concerned About Issues Accessing COVID-19 Vaccines For Their Children

Trusted Sources Of Information

As previous KFF research has shown, pediatricians remain the most trusted source of information on the COVID-19 vaccine for parents. About three in four parents (77%) say they trust their child’s pediatrician or health care provider to provide reliable information about the vaccines for children. Across partisans and across race and ethnicity pediatricians are the most trusted source of vaccine information for parents. About six in ten parents say they trust their local public health department (60%) and the CDC (57%) to provide reliable information about the COVID-19 vaccines for children, though there are large partisan differences with Republicans less likely than Democrats to trust either of these as sources of information. Parents’ trust in the CDC for information regarding vaccines for children has decreased since July when two-thirds (66%) said they had at least a fair amount of trust in the CDC to provide reliable information.

Pediatricians Are The Most Trusted Source Of COVID-19 Vaccine Information For Parents Across Party, Race And Ethnicity

Reaching unvaccinated parents with information about the COVID-19 vaccine for children is likely to be a challenge as they are less likely than their vaccinated counterparts to trust each of the sources of vaccine information tested. Only pediatricians are trusted by a majority of unvaccinated parents to provide reliable information about the COVID-19 vaccine for children, while fewer than half of unvaccinated parents trust the CDC, their local public health department, their child’s school or daycare, or other parents they know for such information.

Unvaccinated Parents Are Less Likely Than Vaccinated Parents To Trust Pediatricians, Public Health Departments, The CDC As Sources Of Vaccine Information

Parents’ Conversations With Health Care Providers

Despite high levels of trust in pediatricians for vaccine information, fewer than half of parents of children ages 5 to 17 say they have talked with their child’s pediatrician or health care provider about the COVID-19 vaccine. Four in ten parents of children ages 5 to 17 have talked with their child’s pediatrician about the COVID-19 vaccine—up from 30% in July—including 45% of parents of teens and 37% of parents of children ages 5 to 11. While most parents who spoke with their child’s health care provider say the provider recommended their child get vaccinated, 34% of parents of teens who spoke to their doctor (16% of total parents of teens) and 40% of parents of children ages 5 to 11 who spoke to their doctor (15% of total parents of kids in this age group) say their pediatrician did not recommend their child get vaccinated for COVID-19.

One In Six Parents Say Their Pediatrician Did Not Recommend A COVID-19 Vaccine For Their Child

On balance, conversations parents have had with health care providers seem to have tipped the scales toward a decision to vaccinate their child for COVID-19. About four in ten (37%) parents who talked to their child’s doctor (15% of all parents of 5-17 year-olds) say the conversation made them more willing to get their child vaccinated for COVID-19, while few say it made them less willing to vaccinate their child. More than one in five Democrats, vaccinated parents, and parents who say their teen ultimately got vaccinated for COVID-19 say they a conversation with their child’s doctor made them more willing to get their child vaccinated.

Few Said Talking To Their Child's Doctor Made Them Less Willing To Get Their Teen Vaccinated, Many Report That It Did Not Change Their Mind About Whether Or Not To Vaccinate

The vast majority of parents (91%) say they have a health care provider they trust to answer questions about their child’s health. However, the share who say they do not have such a trusted provider is somewhat higher among Hispanic parents (14%) than White parents (6%). Parents who are uninsured are three times as likely as those who have health insurance to say they do not have a health care provider that they trust to answer questions about their child’s health (21% vs. 7%). Unsurprisingly, parents without a health care provider that they trust to answer questions about their child’s health are less likely than parents who do have a trusted provider to say they have talked to their child’s pediatrician or health care provider about the COVID-19 vaccine (42% vs. 18%).

The Broader Context Of Parents’ Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Vaccines For Kids

The slowdown in uptake of COVID vaccines among teens comes at a time when about half (49%) of parents of vaccine-eligible children (those between the ages of 5-17) say they are very or somewhat worried that their child will get seriously sick from coronavirus. This is considerably higher than the share of parents who worry that they personally will get seriously ill (36%) and similar to the share who worry about someone else in their family getting sick (54%).

Parents’ worries about their children getting sick are correlated with their vaccine behaviors; two thirds (66%) of those who say they are worried about their child getting sick say that their teen has gotten at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine compared to about four in ten of those who are not worried (38%). Similarly, among parents who are worried about their child getting sick, 23% say their 5-11 year-old has been vaccinated for COVID-19, whereas among those who are not worried, just 9% say their younger child has gotten the vaccine.

About Half Of Parents Of Vaccine-Eligible Children Are Worried Their Child Will Get Seriously Sick From COVID-19

The share of parents who worry about their children getting seriously ill from COVID-19 is considerably higher among certain populations compared with others. For example, majorities of Hispanic parents (66%) and Black parents (58%) say they are worried compared with 43% of White parents. Vaccinated parents are more likely to worry about their child getting sick than unvaccinated parents (59% vs. 33%) as are mothers compared to fathers (55% vs. 41%) and those without college degrees compared to college graduates (53% vs. 41%). There is a partisan dimension to worry as well, with 70% of Democrats saying they are worried about their children getting seriously ill from COVID-19 compared to 26% of Republicans.

Some Parents Are More Likely Than Others To Worry About Their Child Getting Sick From COVID-19

Despite concerns among parents about other family members besides their children getting seriously ill from COVID-19, by a 3-to-1 margin parents see protecting their children from getting sick as a bigger reason to get them vaccinated, rather than preventing them from spreading coronavirus to other family members. Among parents of both teens and younger children, about three-quarters say protecting their child from illness is the bigger reason to get them vaccinated compared to about a quarter who say preventing spread to other family members is the bigger reason.

Most Parents See Protecting Children From COVID-19 As A Bigger Reason To Get Them Vaccinated Than Preventing Spread To Other Family Members

We have consistently found that among adults overall, about half believe that getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is a personal choice and the other half see it as part of everyone’s responsibility to protect the health of others (these shares were 51% and 47%, respectively in our November survey).

When it comes to vaccinating children however, parents lean more heavily towards the side of personal choice. About two-thirds (65%) of parents say that getting children vaccinated is a parent’s personal choice, while one-third (34%) see it as part of a parent’s responsibility to protect the health of others. There is a deep partisan split on this, as nine in ten Republicans (91%) say it is a personal choice, and six in ten Democrats (62%) say it is part of a collective responsibility. Vaccinated parents are split, with about half giving each response (47% vs. 52%), while nearly all unvaccinated parents (94%) say getting children vaccinated is a parent’s personal choice.

Given the emphasis on personal choice, it’s notable that about one in five parents (21%) say they have felt unfairly pressured to get their child vaccinated, rising to three in ten among Republican parents (30%) and those who are themselves unvaccinated (31%).

Most Parents View Getting Children Vaccinated As A Parent's Personal Choice Rather Than Collective Responsibility

A Profile Of Parents Who Have Skipped Or Delayed Other Vaccines

While nine in ten parents say they normally keep their children up-to-date with recommended childhood vaccines such as MMR, 9% say they have delayed or skipped some childhood vaccines for their children. Looking at these parents’ views on COVID-19 vaccines provides some insights into the overlap between general vaccine skepticism and attitudes toward this particular vaccine.

Among parents who have skipped or delayed childhood vaccines for their kids, 69% have not gotten a COVID-19 vaccine themselves, including 64% who say they will “definitely not” get vaccinated. In addition, 68% of this group says they are not confident the COVID-19 vaccine is safe for adults, 77% are not confident it is safe for children ages 12 to 17, and 80% are not confident it is safe for children ages 5 to 11. Further highlighting the challenge for reaching these parents with accurate information about the vaccines, fewer than half (48%) say they trust their child’s pediatrician to provide reliable information about COVID-19 vaccines for children, compared to 80% of parents who have not delayed other childhood vaccines.

Parents Who Have Delayed Or Skipped Vaccines For Their Children Are Less Likely To Be Vaccinated Themselves, And Less Confident In The Vaccines And Information From Their Child's Pediatrician

The Role Of Schools In COVID-19 Vaccinations For Children

Among parents of children ages 5-17 who attend school, about half (49%) say their child’s school has provided them with information about how to get a COVID-19 vaccine for their child, and nearly as many (44%) say the school has encouraged parents to get their child vaccinated. One in five parents say the school has asked about their child’s COVID-19 vaccination status while a much smaller share (9%) say the school has said they will require students to be vaccinated to attend school in-person.

Half Of Parents Say Their Child's School Provided Information About COVID-19 Vaccines, More Than 4 In 10 Say School Encouraged Vaccination

Among parents of children ages 12-17 who were eligible for vaccination over the summer, the shares who say their child’s school provided information on COVID-19 vaccines, encouraged vaccination, or asked about their child’s vaccination status have all increased since July (from 42% to 52%, 40% to 51%, and 11% to 25%, respectively).

Larger Shares Of Parents Of Teens Say Schools Are Providing Them With Information About COVID-19 Vaccines, Encouraging Vaccinations, And Asking About Vaccine Status Than In July

Parents who say their school has encouraged parents to get their children vaccinated are more likely to say their child has indeed gotten vaccinated when compared to parents whose child’s school has not encouraged vaccination. Among parents of 12-17 year-olds whose school encouraged vaccination, 60% say their teen has already gotten the COVID-19 vaccine, compared to four in ten (42%) of parent who say their teen’s school did not encourage vaccination. Similarly, parents of 5-11 year-olds who say their school encouraged them to get their child vaccinated are four times as likely to say their younger child has already gotten the COVID-19 vaccine than those who say their school did not encourage vaccination.

Larger Shares Of Parents Who Say Their Child's School Has Encouraged Vaccinating Children Against COVID-19 Have Gotten Their Children Vaccinated

While previous Vaccine Monitor reports have shown that a majority of the public supports COVID-19 vaccination requirements for K-12 school teachers, the latest survey finds that parents oppose requiring COVID-19 vaccines for eligible students by a 2-to-1 margin. One-third (32%) of parents of 5-17 year-olds who attend school say they think schools should require all eligible students to get a COVID-19 vaccine, while two-thirds (67%) say schools should not have such a requirement. The share of parents who say schools should require students to be vaccinated for COVID-19 is somewhat higher among vaccinated parents (47%) and Hispanic parents (45%), but reaches a majority only among parents who identify as Democrats (55%).

Two-Thirds Of Parents Say Schools Should Not Require COVID-19 Vaccination For Eligible Students

Financial And Health Impacts Of The Pandemic On Parents And Families

As previous research has shown, the COVID-19 pandemic has taken a particular toll on parents and families. Nearly three-quarters (73%) of parents of children under 18 say the pandemic has had a major or minor impact on their children’s education. Almost six in ten parents (58%) say the pandemic has negatively impacted their own mental health, somewhat higher than the share of adults without children who say so (52%). About half of parents say the pandemic has had a negative impact on their relationships with family members (51%) and their ability to pay for basic necessities (50%), again both somewhat higher than among adults without children (45% and 40%, respectively). About four in ten parents also say the pandemic has negatively affected their physical health (41%) and their ability to care for their children (40%).

Parents Report A Variety Of Negative Consequences From The Pandemic, Including Educational, Health, And Financial Impacts

While some of the pandemic’s impacts on families have hit a wide swath of the population, others are more common among certain groups including people of color, those with lower incomes, and mothers. For example, similar shares of parents across groups say the pandemic has negatively affected their children’s education and their relationships with family members. In other areas, negative impacts are less equally distributed. For example, roughly two-thirds of mothers (66%) say the pandemic has negatively impacted their mental health compared to half of fathers. Mothers are also more likely than fathers to report a negative impact on their physical health (49% vs. 32%) as are Black and Hispanic parents compared to White parents (49%, 46%, and 37%, respectively). When it comes to financial impacts, 73% of parents with household incomes under $40,000 and 56% of those with incomes between $40,000 and $90,000 say the pandemic has negatively impacted their ability to pay for basic necessities compared to 28% of higher-income parents. Six in ten Black parents (59%) and Hispanic parents (61%) similarly report negative financial impacts compared to just under half of White parents (45%), as do a higher share of mothers compared to fathers (57% vs. 41%).

Black And Hispanic Parents, Those With Lower Incomes, And Mothers More Likely To Report Some Negative Impacts Of The Pandemic

Methodology

This KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor Poll was designed and analyzed by public opinion researchers at the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). The survey was conducted November 8-23, 2021 via telephone and online among a nationally representative sample of 1,196 parents with a child under the age of 18 in their household. The sample includes 483 parents reached through the November 2021 KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor and 713 who were reached online through a probability-based online panel (SSRS Opinion Panel and Ipsos Knowledge Panel). The Vaccine Monitor respondents were reached through a random digit dial telephone sample of adults ages 18 and older (including interviews from 139 Hispanic parents and 114 non-Hispanic Black parents), living in the United States. Phone numbers used for the telephone component were randomly generated from cell phone and landline sampling frames, with an overlapping frame design, and disproportionate stratification aimed at reaching Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black respondents as well as those living in areas with high rates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. The sample also included 93 parents reached by calling back respondents that had previously completed an interview on the KFF Tracking poll (n=52) or the SSRS Omnibus poll (n=41) at least six months ago. See the November 2021 KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor for further details on the telephone component.

For the online component, invitations were sent to panel members who previously identified as the parent of a child ages 5 to 17. As with the telephone component, Hispanic and Black respondents were oversampled. The SSRS Opinion Panel and Ipsos Knowledge Panel are nationally representative probability-based web panels. SSRS Probability Panel members are recruited randomly in one of two ways: (a) Through invitations mailed to respondents randomly sampled from an Address-Based Sample (ABS). ABS respondents are randomly sampled by MSG through the U.S. Postal Service’s Computerized Delivery Sequence (CDS). (b) from a dual-frame random digit dial (RDD) sample, through the SSRS Omnibus survey platform. Sample for the SSRS Omnibus is obtained through Marketing System Groups (MSG). Ipsos Knowledge Panel members are also recruited using ABS, based on a stratified sample from the CDS.

The combined telephone and online parent samples were weighted to match the sample’s demographics to the national parent population using data from the Census Bureau’s 2019 U.S. American Community Survey (ACS). Weighting parameters included sex, age, education, marital status, child age, and region, within race-groups. The sample was also weighted to match current patterns of telephone use using data from the January-June 2021 National Health Interview Survey. The weights take into account differences in the probability of selection for each sample type (phone and web). This includes adjustment for the sample design and geographic stratification of the telephone sample, within household probability of selection, and the design of the panel-recruitment procedure.

The margin of sampling error including the design effect for the full sample of parents is plus or minus 4 percentage points. Numbers of respondents and margins of sampling error for key subgroups are shown in the table below. For results based on other subgroups, the margin of sampling error may be higher. Sample sizes and margins of sampling error for other subgroups are available by request. Sampling error is only one of many potential sources of error and there may be other unmeasured error in this or any other public opinion poll. Kaiser Family Foundation public opinion and survey research is a charter member of the Transparency Initiative of the American Association for Public Opinion Research.

This work was supported in part by grants from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative DAF (an advised fund of Silicon Valley Community Foundation), the Ford Foundation, and the Molina Family Foundation. We value our funders. KFF maintains full editorial control over all of its policy analysis, polling, and journalism activities.

GroupN (unweighted)M.O.S.E.
Total Parents of Children Under 18 in Household1,196± 4 percentage points
Parent Race/Ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic418± 6 percentage points
Black, non-Hispanic354± 7 percentage points
Hispanic367± 7 percentage points
Child Age Groups
Parents of children under age 5436± 7 percentage points
Parents of children ages 5-11667± 5 percentage points
Parents of children ages 12-17702± 5 percentage points

 

News Release

Following an Early Period of High Demand, Vaccination for Children Ages 5-11 Has Significantly Slowed

Published: Dec 8, 2021

As of December 5, 16.7% of 5-11 year-olds had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose with 4.3% of children reaching full vaccination, according to a new KFF analysis. After a short period of high demand, the rate of new vaccinations slowed significantly leading into the Thanksgiving holiday and has continued at the slower pace since.

Vaccination efforts around the country continue to differ, with more than a 40 percentage point difference between the top ranking vaccinated states versus the bottom ranking states. For example, 45.6% of children in Vermont ages 5-11 have received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, compared to 3.6% of children ages 5-11 in West Virginia. Northeastern states are more likely to have vaccine coverage compared to the South, with New England having vaccinated at least 30% of children.

There are approximately 28 million children between the ages of 5-11. Currently, only 4.8 million children have received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose.

An Update on Vaccine Roll-Out for 5-11 Year-olds in the U.S.

Published: Dec 8, 2021

Introduction

On November 2, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for children, ages 5-11, in the United States, making the U.S. one of the first countries to do so. We previously discussed many of the issues to consider in rolling out pediatric COVID-19 vaccines to the 28 million 5-11 year-olds living in the U.S., including that a new formulation of the vaccine needed to be shipped for this purpose, different vaccine providers would need to be engaged, and parents and caregivers would play the determinate role in the effort, all factors suggesting that rollout might face unique issues. Now, a little more than one month since vaccines were first recommended for kids, we examine progress to date nationally and by state.

Our analysis is based on data obtained from the CDC’s Data Tracker, which itself is based on data reported by jurisdictions to CDC; however, there may be differences between the CDC Tracker and data provided on individual state websites due to reporting timeframe and other factors. To calculate the number of 5-11 year-olds who had received at least one vaccine dose by state, we calculated the difference between the number of those aged 5+ with at least one dose and the number of those aged 12+ with one dose. We included data from federal entities, territories and associated jurisdictions in our national totals, but only the 50 states and DC in our state analysis. Data from Idaho were not available for this age group. Data are as of December 5, 2021.

Overall, we find that after an initial period of high demand, vaccination progress among those ages 5-11 has slowed significantly. The increase in new doses administered began slowing leading up to the Thanksgiving holiday and has continued since. In addition, like vaccination rates for adults, we find wide variation in coverage across the country. Specific findings are as follows:

Findings

Nationally, an estimated 16.7% of 5-11 year-olds had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose as of December 5, 2021 (Figure 1). This represents almost 4.8 million of the approximately 28 million children in this age group in the United States. Given the two dose Pfizer regimen, administered three weeks apart, and the need for a two-week period afterward to be considered fully vaccinated, just 4.3% of children have reached this point.

The rate of vaccination among 5-11 year-olds has slowed considerably, a drop that preceded the Thanksgiving holiday and has continued since. Vaccination rates among 5-11 year-olds, as measured by first doses administered daily, rose sharply after the recommendation was first made on November 2. One week later, on November 9, the rate had risen to 4% and on November 16, it was 9.8%. Since then, however, and leading into the Thanksgiving holiday, the rate of first dose administration began to slow and has continued to decline since (Figure 2).

Cumulative Share of 5-11 Year-Olds with at Least One COVID-19 Vaccine Dose
New Daily Doses Administered to 5-11 Year Olds, Number and 7-Day Rolling Average

At the state level, as with the rest of the COVID-19 vaccination effort, there is significant variation across the country, with a more than 40 percentage point difference between the top and bottom ranking states. The share of children having received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose ranged from 45.6% in Vermont to just 3.6% in West Virginia (Table 1). Eight states have vaccinated a quarter or more of 5-11 year-olds; ten states have vaccinated fewer than 10%.

There are some regional differences, with states in the Northeast more likely to have achieved higher coverage rates, while those in the South more likely to rank towards the bottom. The four states with highest vaccination rates, all in New England (Vermont, Massachusetts, Maine, and Rhode Island), have vaccinated at least 30% of children while the four states with the lowest vaccination rates (West Virginia, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama) have vaccinated 6% or less (Table 1). Eight of the ten states with the lowest vaccine coverage among 5-11 year-olds are in the South.

Across most (34) states, rankings on vaccination rates for children ages 5-11 are similar (within 10 points) of their adult, 18+ rankings. Among the ten states with the highest vaccination rates for children, six (Vermont, Massachusetts, Maine, Rhode Island, DC, and Connecticut) also rank in the top ten states for adult vaccinations (Table 1). At the other end of the spectrum, of the ten states that rank lowest in vaccination rates for children, six (Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Wyoming, Tennessee, and Georgia) are also in the bottom ten rankings for vaccinations for adults.

Discussion

While approximately 4.8 million children, ages 5-11, have received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, we find that just over one month into the pediatric vaccination effort, the rate of increase appears to already be leveling off. This drop-off began before the Thanksgiving holiday and has continued since, suggesting that eager parents and caregivers, who make vaccination decisions for children, have already come forward. Indeed, our polling has found that two thirds of parents say they will wait and see or won’t get their child vaccinated against COVID-19 at all, and this next phase of the vaccination effort will likely be much harder.

As with vaccination rates for adults, the share of children ages 5-11 having received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose varies quite significantly across states. Given the role parents play in vaccination decisions for their children, it is perhaps not surprising that many of the states with among the lowest vaccination rates for adults also have the lowest vaccine coverage for children. At the same time, while state rankings on vaccination rates for children ages 5-11 generally mirror those for adults, a handful of states appear to be doing a better job of vaccinating children compared to adults. Understanding the factors contributing to the higher rankings for these states could help identify strategies for reducing barriers and vaccine hesitancy among parents in states with lower rankings.

Finally, at least as important as tracking overall vaccination rates for children is understanding who those children are, in order to be able to assess access and equity. However, there are limited data available to do so. Nationally, data on vaccination status by age and race/ethnicity are not available and only a handful of states report data disaggregated at this level.

Table: Number and Share of Children, Ages 5-11, Who Have Been Vaccinated with at Least One COVID-19 Vaccine Dose
News Release

KHN and Guardian US Win National Press Club Award for “Lost on the Frontline”

The Year-Long Investigative Project Chronicles the Lives of More than 3,600 Health Care Workers Who Died of COVID-19

Published: Dec 8, 2021

KFF’s Kaiser Health News (KHN) and Guardian US have won the National Press Club’s top award for online journalism for their “Lost on the Frontline” investigation. The year-long project documented the lives of more than 3,600 health care workers in the U.S. who died after contracting covid-19 on the job.

The Press Club’s Joan M. Friedenberg Online Journalism Award recognizes “the best journalism that uses online technology to provide a more compelling report than a print or broadcast story alone.” Journalists at KHN and the Guardian developed a searchable online database of those who died and used that as the jumping off point for  a series of investigative reports that provided a window into the workings – and failings – of the American health care system during the pandemic.

They found that many of the deaths could have been prevented. Widespread shortages of masks and other personal protective gear, a lack of covid testing, weak contact tracing, inconsistent mask guidance by politicians, missteps by employers and lax enforcement of workplace safety rules by government regulators all contributed to the increased risk faced by health care workers.

Among the key findings was that two-thirds of deceased health care workers for whom the project has data were people of color, revealing the deep inequities tied to race, ethnicity and economic status in America’s health care workforce. Lower-paid workers such as nurses, support staff and nursing home employees were more likely to die than physicians were.

More than 100 journalists contributed to the project. They filed public records requests, combed through governmental and private data sources, scoured obituaries and social media posts, and confirmed deaths through family members, workplaces, and colleagues.

This is the second time in four years that KHN has won this National Press Club award. The newsroom, an operating program of KFF, won in 2018 for an investigation into the booming orphan drug business. The Lost on the Frontline project also has been recognized with awards from the News Leaders Association, World Association of News Publishers and the NIHCM Foundation, just a few of the many awards and honors that KHN has received for its journalism.

 

About KFF and KHN

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.

 

About Guardian News & Media

Guardian US is renowned for its Pulitzer Prize-winning investigation into widespread secret surveillance by the National Security Agency, and for other award-winning work, including The Paradise Papers. Guardian US has bureaus in New York, Washington, New Orleans and Oakland, California, covering the climate crisis, politics, race and immigration, gender, national security and more.

Guardian News & Media (GNM), publisher of theguardian.com, is one of the largest English-speaking newspaper websites in the world. Since launching its U.S. and Australian digital editions in 2011 and 2013, respectively, traffic from outside of the U.K. now represents over two-thirds of The Guardian’s total digital audience.

# #

News Release

KFF’s Kaiser Health News Wins NABJ Award for Excellence in Radio Journalism for a Story About Teaching Children to Cope with the Constant Threat of Gun Violence in Their Communities

Published: Dec 8, 2021

The National Association of Black Journalists has recognized KFF’s Kaiser Health News and two of its editorial partners with a 2021 “Salute to Excellence” award for a radio story about how children are taught to cope and survive in communities beset by gun violence.

The story, Teaching Kids To Hide From Gunfire: Safety Drills At Day Care And At Home, by KHN Midwest Correspondent Cara Anthony, in partnership with St. Louis Public Radio and NPR, took top honors among feature stories that aired in mid-sized and smaller radio markets.

Anthony and St. Louis Public Radio photojournalist Carolina Hidalgo explored the hiding places where children go when gunfire erupts in their neighborhoods, where random bullets are a constant danger. Anthony interviewed more than two dozen parents and caregivers who told her how kids hide underneath beds, in basements and dry bathtubs, waiting for gunfire to stop. She learned how teachers drilled the preschoolers on how to drop to the ground when a teacher yelled “Dora the Explorer.” Some families do such drills at home. They take safety steps such as positioning couches to serve as protection from stray bullets or watching TV on the floor to stay out of the line of fire.

The story explored the mental health toll of living in constant fear, as well as potential long-term health effects such as heart disease, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and stroke that such “adverse childhood experiences” can fuel. The story also was part of a package that won a national Edward R. Murrow Award for Excellence in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion this year from the Radio Television Digital News Association, one of many awards and honors that KHN has received for its journalism.

The Salute to Excellence Awards are part of NABJ’s efforts to recognize journalism “that best covers the Black experience or addresses issues affecting the worldwide Black community.” The competition is open to all media organizations and individuals involved in print, broadcast, and all forms of digital journalism. Entries are judged on content, creativity, innovation, use of the medium and relevance to the Black community.

About KFF and KHN

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation. 

About St. Louis Public Radio

St. Louis Public Radio is an award-winning news organization and NPR member station, providing in-depth news, insightful discussion, and entertaining programs to a half-million people per month on air and online. With a large, St. Louis-based newsroom and reporters stationed in Jefferson City and Rolla, Missouri, and Belleville, Illinois, the station’s journalists find and tell important stories about communities across the region and help people become deeply informed about the issues that affect their lives. Broadcasting on 90.7 KWMU-FM in St. Louis, 90.3 WQUB in Quincy, Illinois, 88.5 KMST in Rolla and 96.3 K242AN in Lebanon, Missouri, and sharing news and music online at stlpublicradio.org, St. Louis Public Radio is a member-supported service of the University of Missouri-St. Louis.

About NPR

NPR, which is celebrating its 50th anniversary this year, is widely known for its rigorous reporting and unsurpassed storytelling that connects with millions of Americans every day — on the air, online, and in-person. NPR strives to create a more informed public — one challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of events, ideas, and cultures. With a nationwide network of award-winning journalists and 17 international bureaus, NPR and its Member Stations are never far from where a story is unfolding.

 

How Build Back Better Would Affect Drug Costs

Published: Dec 8, 2021

On November 19, 2021, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act (BBBA), which includes a broad package of health, social, and environmental proposals supported by President Biden. The BBBA includes several provisions that would lower prescription drug costs for people with Medicare and private insurance and reduce drug spending by the federal government and private payers.

The provisions would allow the federal government to negotiate prices for some high-cost drugs covered under Medicare; require inflation rebates to limit annual increases in drug prices in Medicare and private insurance; cap out-of-pocket spending for Medicare Part D enrollees along with other Part D benefit changes; limit monthly copays for insulin to $35 for people with Medicare and private insurance; improve coverage of adult vaccines in Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP; and repeal the Trump Administration’s drug rebate rule.

These provisions would take effect over the next several years, beginning in 2023. The BBBA, including these provisions, may be modified as the Senate considers the legislation.

Source

Explaining the Prescription Drug Provisions in the Build Back Better Act

News Release

County-Level Analysis Finds ACA Premiums are Falling in Many Areas of the Country, Though Changes Vary by County and Type of Plan

In Many Counties, Tax Credits Would Cover the Premiums for a Silver Plan for Low-Income Residents and for a Bronze Plan for Those with Somewhat Higher Incomes

Published: Dec 7, 2021

Premiums for the Affordable Care Act Marketplace benchmark silver plan are decreasing 3.1 percent on average across the country – the fourth year in a row that benchmark premiums have fallen – though the changes vary by county, a new KFF county-by-county analysis finds.

The benchmark plan premiums are important because they are used to determine the tax credits available to people who buy their own insurance through the Marketplaces. What people would have to pay in premiums, if anything, will depend on where they live, the plan they choose, and their age and income.

An interactive map illustrates changes in premiums after tax credits for the lowest-cost bronze, silver and gold plans by county for a 40-year-old at varying income levels. Key findings include:

• Across counties, average premiums before tax credits fell 1.8 percent for the lowest-cost silver plan and 4.1 percent for the lowest-cost gold plan. Average premiums changed little for the lowest-cost bronze plan (up 0.3%).

• Due to this year’s American Rescue Plan Act, people with incomes up to 150% are eligible ($19,320 for an individual and $39,750 for a family of 4) for a silver-level plans without a monthly premium and with additional cost-sharing subsidies to lower their deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses. In two-thirds of counties nationwide, tax credits also would cover the full premium for the lowest-cost silver plan for a 40-year-old earning $20,000 a year (155% of the federal poverty level). These enrollees may have to pay a nominal amount for coverage in some counties because the tax credits only apply to “essential health benefits.”

• In a third of counties, tax credits would cover the full cost of the lowest-premium bronze plan for a 40-year-old earning $35,000 a year (272% of the federal poverty level). Such plans typically have high cost-sharing requirements but provide substantial protection in case of severe illness.

The analysis examines data from insurer rate filings to state regulators, state exchange websites and HealthCare.gov to assess how premiums are changing at the county level. This year’s American Rescue Plan Act temporarily made the tax credits more generous for 2021 and 2022, though they are set to expire in 2023.

The ACA open enrollment period for the federal Marketplace and most state Marketplaces began Nov. 1 and ends on Jan. 15. KFF’s updated Health Insurance Marketplace Calculator allows consumers to estimate their ACA premiums after any tax credits if they buy coverage on their own in the ACA marketplaces. Consumers also can search our collection of more than 300 Frequently Asked Questions about open enrollment, the health insurance marketplaces and the ACA. Most questions are also available in Spanish.

State Restrictions on Telehealth Abortion

Authors: Emma Anderson, Alina Salganicoff, and Laurie Sobel
Published: Dec 2, 2021

On December 1, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, an abortion case that could effectively overturn Roe v. Wade. While the Supreme Court is deciding on the future of abortion, the FDA is currently reviewing a policy that could also affect the availability of medication abortion – the most common method of terminating a pregnancy in the first 10 weeks.

Mifepristone, one of the two drugs taken for medication abortion, cannot be dispensed by retail pharmacies like most other medications; rather, pregnant patients can only obtain the drug directly from an abortion provider even though the medications are typically taken at home. The FDA has suspended its enforcement of this in-person dispensing requirement during the pandemic health emergency to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission in health care settings. However, 19 states ban or restrict the use of telehealth for abortion. Five states completely ban telehealth for medication abortion, while the other 14 states require the physical presence of the prescribing clinician to receive the medication

If Roe v. Wade is overturned, many states will quickly move to restrict or ban abortions. People seeking an abortion who live in those states may be able to access medication abortion via telehealth if their state does not restrict telehealth abortions and if they are within the first 10 weeks of pregnancy.

Source

The Availability and Use of Medication Abortion