Charles Ornstein Article – Fourth in Series on How Firms Choose Health Plans

Published: Dec 30, 2002

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

Behind-scenes Look Shows How Firm Chose Health Plans

Fourth in an occasional series

12/24/2000

By Charles Ornstein Reprinted with permission of The Dallas Morning News

“Health insurance is obviously an important decision,” said Mr. Gilmore, 56, a vendor training coordinator for Verizon Communications Inc. “But it’s taken on a little bit less importance because we’ve been satisfied with Cigna, and my kids are older now and they’re both married and I don’t cover them with insurance anymore.”

Mr. Gilmore and many of his fellow employees took little more than a day to make decisions about health coverage, but three regional health-care managers spent eight months vetting health plans and negotiating contracts that will take effect Jan. 1.

The trio’s choices would have to satisfy the demands of 284,000 employees, retirees and their dependents of the former GTE Corp. while fitting within a whopping half-billion-dollar budget eventually approved by chairman and chief executive Charles R. Lee. This particular line item consumed nearly 8 percent of GTE’s operating income in 1999.

Along the way, the three managers encountered steep increases in medical and prescription drug costs, financially unstable HMOs and renewed efforts to reduce medical errors in hospitals.

Typically, employees don’t get to peek behind the veil of secrecy associated with benefits selection, receiving little information besides an enrollment kit each fall. But for this article, GTE provided exclusive and unprecedented access – and candidly discussed the factors that affected decision-making. That included access to internal meetings, visits with health insurers, company documents and employee interviews.

In the midst of an already complicated process, GTE underwent dramatic corporate changes. In one year, it divested itself of two units, spun off its wireless operations into a joint venture with Vodafone Group PLC, and merged with Bell Atlantic Corp. to form Verizon.

Privately, GTE’s benefits staff questioned whether they would even have jobs after the merger. Like many corporations, its partner Bell Atlantic relied heavily on consultants to select insurance programs.

A bad year

From the get-go, regional health-care manager George Crowling and his two colleagues at GTE knew this year would bring cost increases unseen during the mid- and late 1990s.

On a visit to mideastern Illinois, where GTE provides local phone service and employs about 400 people, Mr. Crowling was faced with a 60 percent premium increase for retirees by a local HMO called Health Alliance Medical Plans. That was on top of a 13 percent increase for active employees.

In St. Louis, industry colossus UnitedHealthcare demanded an increase of 29 percent to cover GTE employees across Missouri.

Mr. Crowling and his two co-workers logged nearly 100 visits with health plans this year, developing a strategy that responded to trends they saw across the country.

“They’re atypical in the way they do things,” said Larry Atkins, president of Health Policy Analysts Inc., a Washington-based benefits policy and consulting firm. “There probably are not a lot of companies out there really scouring these HMOs, turning them upside down, shaking them and then making decisions about which one they want to contract with.

“Most companies say: ‘We really don’t want to go to those lengths. If there’s an off-the-shelf product that somebody else is vetting that will meet our requirements, let’s do that.'”

In the 1999 benefit year, the company spent $548.7 million, or $3,653 for every employee and retiree – the same per capita amount paid in 1994. For this calendar year, the company expects costs to increase by about 5 percent.

As for 2001, the benefits year observed for this article, the company expects a net increase of 8 percent, on top of premium increases absorbed by salaried employees.

In the overall scheme of things, GTE’s medical spending will still look pretty good, compared with other large companies, said Mr. Crowling, regional health-care manager for Texas and 13 other states. But that doesn’t mean he and other executives aren’t worried by the trend.

Bruce Taylor, director of employee benefit policy and plans at the newly minted Verizon, brought home the magnitude of the cost increases during a September speech in Toronto.

Verizon, he said, will spend nearly $500 million per year on prescription drugs, including the amount spent by its HMOs. Conservatively, drug spending is increasing at 15 percent annually – or $75 million a year.

“That means … every time you go by a phone booth, a Verizon phone booth, I need to have 300 million more phone calls at 25 cents each just to pay for the increased costs for prescription drugs,” Mr. Taylor said. “If you let me take the price of the phone call up to 35 cents, then it goes down” to 214 million extra phone calls.

‘Wet cement’

On a rainy, unseasonably warm day in February, a team of 26 people crammed into a small, windowless conference room in Coppell to begin the selection process and set key dates in “wet cement.”

The group was divided between representatives of GTE and Hewitt Associates, the firm hired to administer GTE’s behind-the-scenes benefits process. Hewitt, based in Lincolnshire, Ill., processes paperwork, runs GTE’s customer service center, calculates its premium payments to HMOs and helps new employees enroll in the system.

The marching orders from the executive suite largely paralleled those of years past: Hold cost increases to less than 75 percent of the national average; improve employee satisfaction through external measurable means; and prevent labor disruptions over health care.

But the merger with Bell Atlantic prompted two new directives: Don’t make any major changes; and begin aligning plans with Bell Atlantic.

“We make sure that our employees are focused on beating our competitors as opposed to being distracted by hassles of health-care needs or delivery systems,” said Ezra Singer, Verizon’s executive vice president for human resources. “If they’re able to keep their eye on the competitive issue, that’s what we want.”

The job of keeping the benefits selection team on track fell to John Large, project manager for annual enrollment. “The process starts rolling,” he exhorted. “Everybody knows what they have to do.”

For the most part, Mr. Large was correct, and his team met most of the 115 key deadlines, 46 of them considered critical milestones. Among them: Complete a communications plan by the end of April. Identify health plans to drop by the end of June. Determine the company’s share of insurance premiums by the end of July.

All of this, of course, was designed to launch open enrollment for active employees on Oct. 6 and give the team time to notify employees whether they were required to change plans. The selection process ended Nov. 10.

Everybody at the meeting was conscious of the impending merger with Bell Atlantic, the big telephone provider on the East Coast. The deal would create the largest local phone company and move GTE headquarters from Irving to New York.

“We have a lot going on this year that we didn’t have going on last year,” one participant said.

Once the dust settled, members of the health-plan team received preliminary indications that their jobs were safe. Yet Verizon’s health-care strategy remains under development.

“What I want to do going forward is really take the best aspects of Bell Atlantic and GTE, and at the same time, look at what other companies are doing,” Mr. Singer said. “Whatever we do, I want to make sure that it’s sustainable and that it can last for a long while.”

‘An endless pit’

After the introductory meeting in February, the situation was largely quiet for the next couple of months, with teams working behind the scenes. Beginning in May, though, the health benefits managers began holding meetings with health plans, securing bids for 2001 premiums and making changes.

They also spent a good deal of time discussing prescription drug prices, which Verizon’s Mr. Taylor called an endless pit.

“There’s no such thing as too much resources dedicated to managing prescription drugs,” he said.

At their visits to the health plans, the regional health-care managers employed shortcuts to trim costs without sacrificing benefits. Mr. Crowling slightly lowered the premium increase for Health Alliance in Illinois by increasing the patients’ $10 co-payment for physician-office visits to $15. He also raised the price of some brand-name drugs to $15 from $10.

Mr. Crowling reduced the premium increase for United’s Missouri health plan by proposing to self-insure it. That means GTE, not United, would assume the risk for all of its employees’ medical claims. As a result, United reduced its increase to 19 percent, and it remained an insured product.

Using these methods and others, GTE officials said, they lowered its overall 2001 cost increase from an anticipated 11 percent to 8 percent.

The zipper

After Mr. Crowling and the other regional managers collect the data on the cost of the health plans, Mr. Taylor and GTE’s executives determine how much money the corporation will allocate for medical costs. Employees pay the remainder, under a complicated formula known as “the zipper.”

GTE assigns each health plan to one of 14 slots, based on quality and cost, and consumers pay a different amount – or nothing at all – based on where their health plan is assigned.

Employee contributions at GTE have increased slightly with time. The average employee and retiree paid $298 toward medical premiums in 1999, compared with $257 in 1994. The average includes union members, who represent about half of GTE’s workforce, even though they do not contribute to premiums.

Even excluding union members, however, GTE officials said their employees pay lower premiums than employees at most national corporations.

In late August, the curtain rose on the selection process when GTE distributed its first reminders about open enrollment and a wallet-size card with a personal access number for the Internet and automated telephone systems. The benefits staff followed up with an e-mail reminder to all employees.

But several steps remained. Hewitt arranged for the printing, collating and mailing of millions of pages of information. The material went out in three cycles, with about 50,000 people in each wave.

Union workers came first and received a full enrollment kit, complete with descriptions of available health plans. Retirees received a similar package.

Salaried workers got a two-page letter directing them to one of three routes: the Internet, the automated phone system or a request for a full enrollment kit. Of the 42,000 people who received the letter, only 2,000 requested a hard-copy kit.

Any employee or retiree who changed plans had to be sent a subsequent letter confirming any changes. GTE officials say 85 percent of active employees made no changes at all. Of the rest, 58 percent made changes online.

Gail Morgan was one of the employees who decided against making any changes, sticking with Cigna.

“I guess if I had problems with them – if it took me a week to get in to see my doctor every time I called – then I’d probably be looking at the other plans,” said Ms. Morgan, 51, who works on the company’s regulatory filings. “As long as I’m happy with them and don’t have any problems, I don’t even compare the other plans.”

Even though they don’t know the intricacies of the process, employees said they can imagine that the benefits selection process takes a while.

“It wouldn’t surprise me if they’re already working on next year’s,” Ms. Morgan said.

Kaiser Family Foundation: Seventeen – Surveys

Published: Dec 30, 2002

SexSmarts

The Kaiser Family Foundation has teamed up with seventeen, the nation’s top teen magazine, to create SexSmarts, a campaign to provide young people with information and resources on sexual health issues. The on-going campaign, begun in 2000, addresses a range of topics from decision making about sex, including how to say no, to the real facts on HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). It includes special articles in the magazine, a monthly column and resources at seventeen.com, and other consumer education materials. Under the partnership, seventeen (a PRIMEDIA magazine) and Kaiser also survey teens quarterly about their knowledge and attitudes about sex and sexual health. These nationally representative survey snapshots help to frame the SexSmarts campaign, and the results are distributed to thousands of media and youth advocates nationwide.

SexSmarts Articles in seventeen Magazine 2000-2003

  • “The Double Standard,” January 2003.
  • “Don’t You Trust Me?” October 2002.
  • “Talk to Me,” August 2002.
  • “Sex, Drugs & Rock ‘n’ Roll,” June 2002.
  • “The ABCs of STDs,” September 2001.
  • “The Vagina Dialogues: Scripts and tips for talking about your sexual health,” June 2001.
  • “Control Issues: Eight common myths-and the facts-about condoms and the pill,” January 2001.
  • “To have (or not to have) sex,” October 2000.
  • “SexSmarts,” a special insert in seventeen in June 2000.
  • “What do you know about…sex?” April 2000.

SexSmarts Surveys 2000-2003

Virginity and the First Time. This survey examines teen’s attitudes and opinions about virginity and first sexual activity among adolescents. It covers a variety of issues related to decision making, including when and why some teens hoose to have sex and what issues and concerns influence their decision to wait (October 2003).Summary of Findings Toplines Gender Roles. This survey on teens and gender roles considers many old stereotypes that persist among teens today, reflecting a double standard when it comes to relationships and sexual decision-making (December 2002).Summary of Findings Toplines Relationships. This survey examines the way teens think about sexual activity, STD testing, contraceptive use and condoms within different types of relationships (October 2002).Summary of Findings Toplines Teens and Sexual Health Communication. This survey is about sexual health communication between teens and their parents, health care providers and partners (July 2002).Summary of Findings Toplines Sexual Activity and Substance Use Among Youth. This survey addresses the pressures and decisions faced by teens and young adults involving alcohol, drugs, and sexual activity (February 2002).Sexually Transmitted Disease. This survey examines teen knowledge and attitudes about sexually transmitted diseases, including risk, testing and treatment (August 2001).Sexual Health Care and Counsel. This survey focuses on what teens say are barriers to sexual health care services for themselves, and their peers (May 2001).“Safer Sex,” Condoms and “the Pill”. This survey reveals what teens think about safer sex, what they know (and don’t) about their options for contraception and protection (November 2000).Decision Making. This survey addresses some of the complex issues influencing teenagers’ decision making about sex and relationships (September 2000).

SexSmarts OnlineThe SexSmarts campaign includes a website at seventeen.com – one of the top sites for teens. At http://www.seventeen.com/sexsmarts teens read monthly columns, find online resources and hotlines, and take quizzes testing their knowledge on sexual health issues. The website is promoted in seventeen magazine.

Linda Wright Moore Article – Race and Health Care

Published: Dec 30, 2002

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

At the Heart of Race and Health Care

11/27/00

By Linda Wright Moore Reprinted with permission of Philadelphia Daily News

Dr. Charles Bridges, assistant professor of surgery at Penn’s medical school and clinical director of cardiac surgery at Pennsylvania Hospital, understands that racial disparities in health care are much more than skin deep.

That premise is clear in his latest research, a study of differences in the death rates of blacks and whites who undergo coronary bypass surgery. His study was published last week in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Bridges and his colleagues found that fewer than 4 percent of all patients studied died as result of coronary artery bypass surgery – but that black patients were 29 percent more likely to die than whites. And that’s even when other known risk factors, such as age, kidney failure and heart failure, were taken into account.

So what’s going on?

“Race is probably a marker for other biological variables that may have to do with cell function that protects people from heart disease,” Bridges hypothesized.

“These cells may work differently in some black patients, so that they tend to have less protection and more severe heart disease at an earlier age. . .So blacks may have higher mortality, not because they are black, but because of a different biology.”

That biological difference might be shared by some black people – and by people of other races as well.

But to sort it all out will require more research.

Expensive, extensive research. And on Wednesday President Clinton signed into law a measure that could help fund research like Charles Bridges’.

The new law could be a foundation and a first step toward eliminating wide and persistent health disparities that cause millions of Americans to live sicker and die sooner than most of their fellow citizens.

First introduced in June 1999 by U.S. Rep. Jesse L. Jackson Jr., D-Ill., the legislation that became the Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Education Act of 2000 was strongly supported by Democrats. But the proposal was almost derailed when conservative House Republicans circulated a memo claiming the bill contained “several racial set-asides and quotas” for grant and loan programs.

The bill was rescued by Republican Sen. Bill Frist, who represents a Tennessee constituency of low-income blacks and Appalachian whites. Frist expanded the bill to include all health disparities – including those experienced by poor whites.

Now, the new law calls for:

Annual spending of at least $100 million for research on health disparities.

$50 million for studies to identify causes of health disparities and explore strategies for eliminating them.

$21 million for education programs to help doctors learn techniques of “culturally competent” care.

Unspecified funding for repayment of educational loans to health professionals who conduct research on minority health or health disparities.

Add in the budget of the existing Office of Research on Minority Health and the total for research into how race affects health is nearly $250 million per year.

“To address this problem with a more targeted approach, we need better data and understanding of the factors that drive the problem,” said Marsha Lillie-Blanton, an African-American who is vice president of the Kaiser Family Health Foundation, where she directs policy research and grants on access to care for vulnerable populations.

“In the past, most researchers studying us were not people who understand us and our communities. This [new law] will train minority researchers and invest in research targeting the needs and problems of minority and disadvantaged communities.”

Money and a solid hypothesis drive research. Along with new dollars under the minority health and disparities law, the nonprofit Center for the Advancement of Health recently announced a $1.5 million pilot program funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, “to train a new generation of minority scientists” to research and solve disparities in health care.

These new resources will enable scientists like Charles Bridges to expand their research.

“We need to systematically investigate biological differences that we found in black patients, such as more severe heart disease at a younger age,” Bridges said. “We also need long-term studies. What about one-year or five-year or 10-year mortality? That would take years, and it would be expensive.”

Expensive and complicated – because, even if race is a factor in medical outcomes, it’s not in itself an answer to the question of eliminating racial disparities in health. “We cannot treat race, but we can treat biological factors,” Bridges pointed out.

So it becomes essential to figure out how biology, poverty, access and culture apply to minority health by asking an array of questions that have clinical and social implications.

“We need to look at the influence of socioeconomic variables,” Bridges said. “Are blacks getting service from the same surgeons as everyone else, or does a certain, limited group of surgeons treat blacks? Are there differences that correlate to where blacks live and the quality of care available in their communities?”

The only downside to the creation of a center devoted to minority health is the risk of “ghetto-izing” research on minorities into a niche with minimal funding, Lillie-Blanton said. The $250 million authorized to begin studying minority health and health disparities is just 1.4 percent of annual National Institute of Health spending.

“It’s not the answer, but it provides an opportunity we haven’t had before to develop research by people who are more knowledgable about our community,” said Lillie-Blanton. “It’s information that will help to leverage what kinds of research should be done in the other divisions of NIH, with larger sums of money.”

The other big problem underlying the issue of health disparities is access – the problem of being less likely to be referred for bypass surgery, heart transplants, angioplasty or catheterization.

“We need to educate physicians and patients about the benefits of these interventions,” said Bridges, “especially where there is no economic barrier to paying for the procedure.”

Bridges said often poor communication between doctor and patient results in less aggressive care for some minority patients, but attitudes about race are also a factor. “We cannot deny that there is a difference in physician attitudes that gets manifest as patient access,” Bridges said. “I have had several African-American patients who, prior to meeting me, had declined to have surgery.

“When I was able to communicate to them the risks, benefits and alternatives in a manner which they found clearer, less threatening and more sensitive to their views, in several cases they agreed to undergo procedures that were necessary.”

One component of the new law specifically calls for education efforts in “culturally competent” care, to help doctors – who are primarily white and male – learn to more effectively treat patients who will be, increasingly, non-white as the nation’s demographics shift in the 21st century.

Along with money, research takes time. And so does changing the way patients are treated. For now, according to Bridges, the best way to reduce race-based disparities in health is for patients and doctors to decide on the appropriateness of heart surgery and other cardiac treatments based on “established clinical data, independent of race.”

Dr. Thomas LaVeist, a professor and researcher at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, is also studying the touchy issue of why whites and blacks get different treatment for cardiac problems.

“The new resources that will flow from the center for minority health are important for researchers who have been toiling for years in the area of disparities in health, and haven’t been able to get the support they need,” LaVeist said.

“Although the center itself has a relatively modest budget now, hopefully, that budget will grow.”

Child Health Facts: National and State Profiles of Coverage

Published: Dec 30, 2002

Nearly 10 million children in the United States lack health insurance coverage and over two-thirds of them or low-income. This databook provides baseline data on how many children are uninsured today and on the extent of Medicaid coverage. It provides astarting point to monitor and assess state efforts to reach and insure more children.

The Decline in Medicaid Spending Growth in 1996: Why Did It Happen?

Published: Dec 30, 2002

This paper provides an overview of Medicaid spending growth in 1996. It updates earlier analyses conducted by the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.

Online Resources Fact Sheet

Published: Dec 30, 2002

Online Resources for Health Policy Information, Research, and Analysis

Key Facts and In-depth Analysis on Timely Health Policy IssuesAccess reports, chartbooks, and fact sheets that provide background and detailed analysis on timely issues such the rising numbers of uninsured, Medicare reform, how states’ fiscal situations are affecting Medicaid, rising health care costs, global HIV/AIDS, racial disparities, and women’s health policy.

Weekly Updates of Health Policy Activity on the HillListen to Health on the Hill with kaisernetwork.org and Congressional Quarterly for a round-up of activity on the Hill.

Daily Summaries of Health Policy News Coverage Stay up to date on national, state, and local health policy news stories with daily summaries containing links to the full text of the original articles and related resources, and a fully searchable archive. Read them online or receive them by email.

Briefings and Background on Current Health Policy Issues Issue spotlights provide background information and the latest developments on health policy issues such as the uninsured, prescription drugs, and HIV/ AIDS.

View webcasts and speaker presentations from Kaiser Family Foundation and Alliance for Health Reform briefings. Tutorials such as “Medicaid 101” and “Medicare 101” provide background on complex health policy issues.

Transcripts and Archived Webcasts of Congressional Hearings and Other Health Policy Events If you cannot attend a hearing or health policy event in person, attend “virtually” by watching webcasts and reading transcripts of the event at your convenience.

The Latest State-Level Data Access health data for your state on such issues as health insurance coverage and the uninsured, Medicaid, Medicare, financing, state legislation, health status, and population demographics.

Public Views on Health Topics Search for public views on more than 300 health topics.

Access key tracking information, historical trends, and in-depth analysis of public opinion about hot health care topics such as prescription drugs for seniors, public attitudes towards HIV/ AIDS, and the uninsured.

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation: Recent Mini-Fellows’ Work

Published: Dec 30, 2002

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation: Recent Mini-Fellows’ Work

Recent Mini-Fellows’ Work:

  • Jenni Bergal, reporter, The Sun-Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, FL
  • Karen Brown, health and general assignment reporter, WFCR-FM public radio
  • Dan Collison, independent radio and television documentary producer
  • Elena de la Cruz, features writer, La Opinion, Los Angeles
  • Liz Doup, reporter, The Sun-Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, FL
  • Susan Leffler, independent special projects producer, West Virginia Public Radio Network
  • Sharon Lerner, reporter and columnist, The Village Voice
  • Bill Zeeble, reporter, KERA-FM Radio, Dallas

Jenni Bergal, reporter, The Sun-Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, FL Project: The Broward County mental health court-a model way to address cases involving mentally ill defendants?

New voluntary court system helps mentally ill inmates get their lives back on track, Sun Sentinel, November 24, 2002


Karen Brown, health and general assignment reporter, WFCR-FM public radio Project: Mental health problems and options among immigrant communities, especially war refugees.

Reports on mental health among refugees in Western Massachusetts, February 2001 onwards


Dan Collison, independent radio and television documentary producer Project: Mentally ill ex-offenders-making the transition back to the community.

DC Productions:


Elena de la Cruz, features writer, La Opinion, Los AngelesProject: Asthma and air contamination–chronic asthma among Latino children, the effects of air pollution, and prevention efforts.


Liz Doup, reporter, The Sun-Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, FL Project: AIDS in South Florida. AIDS in South Florida, Sun Sentinel, June 8, 2003.


Susan Leffler, independent special projects producer, West Virginia Public Radio Network Project: The impact of welfare reform on access to health care for the working poor in West Virginia.

Transportation and Health Care, Transitional Medicaid, Inadequate Health Insurance, CHIP Frustrations (.pdf)The news features were broadcast over the ten station WestVirginia Public Radio Network. Each story was broadcast three times during peakdrive time news programs. Stories were produced by Susan Leffler.


Sharon Lerner, reporter and columnist, The Village Voice Project: Sex education in schools, and federal funding for abstinence-only education programs.

The Sex-Ed Divide, The American Prospect vol. 12 no. 17, September 24, 2001 – October 8, 2001


Bill Zeeble, reporter, KERA-FM Radio, Dallas Project: Diabetes, with particular focus on minority communities at highest risk.

Diabetes: A Ticking Time Bomb, October 2- November 17, 2000Thanks to KERA 90.1 FM for producing and broadcasting the series, and to Public NewsRoom for developing the website.


Boston Interns 2002

Published: Dec 30, 2002

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

2002 Kaiser Media Internships Program:

Week 12 program-August 18-21, 2002 Boston, MA Accommodations: Sheraton Commander Hotel, 16 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138

Sunday, August 18, 20026:00pm:Dinner, Sheraton Commander Hotel Minuteman Room Review of the Internship, preview television intern tapesMonday, August 19, 20028:00am: Continental breakfast, The 16 Garden Street Restaurant 9:00am: Board bus from hotel to go to Harvard School of Public Health (Contact: Terri Mendoza)677 Huntington Avenue, Kresge Building, Room 1109:30-10:20am:Environmental Health: The Health Public Housing InitiativeJonathan Levy, Sc.D., Assistant Professor of Environmental Health & RiskAssessment, Departments of Environmental Health and Health Policy Management, Harvard School of Public Health10:30-11:20am:Tuberculosis Control:Claire Murphy, Community Development Coordinator, Tuberculosis Control Program, Boston Public Health Commission11:30-12:20pm: College Alcohol Study: Toben Nelson, Assistant Director of Program Evaluation for the College Alcohol Study, Department of Health & Social Behavior, Harvard School of Public Health12:30-1:30pm:LuncheonProgram Adjourns1:30pm:Depart Harvard; Walk to New England Journal of MedicineHarvard Medical School Library, Countway Library, 10 Shattuck Street 2:00-3:00pm:Meet with Dr. Gregory Curfman, Executive Editor and other invited editors3:15pm:Board bus for hotel3:30 onwards:Read 2002 Interns clips book6:30pm:Meet in hotel lobby; board bus6:45pm:Dinner: The Helmand, 143 First StreetTuesday, August 20, 2002 8:30am:Continental breakfast, Minuteman Room 9:00-11:30:Review of Video Tapes for Television Interns:–George Strait, former Medical Correspondent, ABC Television News–Callie Crossley, former Health and Medical Producer, 20/20, ABC Television12:00pmBoard bus at hotel12:30pm Working lunch with The Boston Globe health/science teamThe Boston Globe, 135 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 021072:30pm:Board bus (Dan’s Coach Service)3:00-5:00pm:Site Visit, Boston Healthcare for the Homeless, Barbara McInnis House,461 Walnut Avenue, Jamaica Plain, BostonBob Taube, Executive Director and Dr. Jim O Connell5:00 pm:Adjourn Board bus to hotel 6:30pm:Meet in hotel lobby; board bus7:00pm:Dinner: Filippo Ristorante (with invited Boston reporters) 283 Causeway Street, Boston, MA Wednesday, August 21, 2002** Please note Please pack and check out of your room before breakfast; bring your luggage with youto the Minuteman room, or check with hotel bellstand.**8:30 am:Continental breakfast, Minuteman room 9:00am sharp:Clip Review Session:–Paul Delaney, Director, Initiative on Racial Mythology, and Member, National Advisory Committee, Kaiser Media Fellowships Program –Madge Kaplan, Senior Health Desk Editor, Marketplace Radio/WGBH–Phil Hilts, Health/Science Reporter, Boston Bureau, New York Times 12:00pm:Buffet lunchEvaluations & Wrap Up1:30pm:Board bus at hotel for Airport (Dan’s Coach Service)

————————–

Public Education Partnerships: Program on Public Health Information and Partnerships

Published: Dec 30, 2002

Program on Public Health Information and Partnerships

The Foundation’s Program on Public Health Information and Partnerships serves as a resource for the public and media on public health issues. A particular focus is on reaching young people with information about reproductive and sexual health issues, such as HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases, contraception and unintended pregnancy. Other recent public education campaigns have addressed parent-child communication, raised awareness about the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for low-income families, and helped to bridge the digital divide.

Our primary means of reaching the public with critical health information is through public health partnerships with leading media organizations. Current and recent partners include leading television networks such as MTV, CBS, Nickelodeon, Univision, BET, and UPN, and popular consumer magazines such as Essence and Latina (Essence Communications), Family Circle, Glamour, Self, seventeen, Teen People and YM. We also have two general campaigns: Talking with Kids About Tough Issues, a national initiative to support families, and It’s (Your) Sex Life, a print and online initiative to provide information on sexual health issues.

Our partnerships are multi-faceted efforts that use a range of approaches to getting out the information. In addition to customized public service messages, special joint programming and editorial, we also provide extensive resource and referral services for those seeking additional information. We create customized free resources – print and online -that are distributed through dedicated toll-free hotlines and/or websites, which tag all our messages and programming. The Foundation works collaboratively with its partners providing both expert substantive support as well as financial support for research, production and campaign operations.

Through the Kaiser Public Health Advertising Partnership the Foundation has the capacity to develop our own public service messages from concept to final product. We work with leading creative and production companies – or, in some instances, with the in-house production teams at a partner network – to develop high-quality, high-impact public service messages. Our PSAs do not look like typical PSAs. We work collaboratively with our media partners to develop creative that will most effectively reach our target audience, and we secure placement that will maximize visibility. To inform our message development, we regularly conduct surveys, focus groups and other communications research, so that we can better understand what our audiences know as well as how they learn about these issues.

The Program also serves as a general resource for public health information for the media. Our main effort in this area is the New York city-based Kaiser Media Resource Project on Reproductive and Sexual Health, which serves as on-call resource and provides technical assistance for journalists. The Kaiser Media Resource Project also develops fact sheets, issue updates, and other information pieces on a range of sexual health issues as well as conducts a quarterly briefing series for journalists on Emerging Issues in Reproductive Health.

Tina Hoff, Vice President and Director, Program on Public Health Information & Partnerships

Mason Essif Cuba Report

Published: Dec 30, 2002

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

Health Care in Cuba

By Mason Essif April 21 – May 2, 2001

For ten days the six Fellows of the 2000/2001 Kaiser Media Fellowship program explored and evaluated the health care system of Cuba. They met with doctors, nurses, administrators, experts and government officials. The topics ranged from housing conditions to mental health and from STD/HIV prevention to cardiac surgery. While most of the time was spent in Havana, a few days were spent traveling into the mountains to analyze how universal access is guaranteed in the remote and rural areas.

While we were exposed to so much during the trip I divided my video material into four main areas: The Embargo, HIV/AIDS, Primary Care and Natural Medicine. Each segment strings together fragments of discussions with the experts in hopefully a rational manner. There is no narration just these excerpts and pictures of some of the sites and sounds encountered.

OverviewThe Embargo HIV/AIDS Primary CareNatural Medicine

  • Overview: Cuba is quite proud of its health care system and seems to have every right to be. A poor island country whose limited resources are further circumscribed by a strict embargo, Cuba has nevertheless managed to provide health care to every citizen as a basic right. Their doctors and other health care providers are knowledgeable, extremely dedicated and believe in what they are doing. Cuba is a shining example of the power of public health to transform the health of an entire country by a commitment to prevention and by careful management of its medical resources. They share this expertise with the world and many countries have a lot to learn from them. And while public health concerns in the United States have always be tempered by the rights of the individual to take care of himself, Cuba does not seem to have the same dilemma. The right to privacy seems to suffer at the expense of helping the community. Their system is a government system and the same arguments that can be made against their form of governing can be made against the government’s control of the health care system. The government sets the priorities and the system complies. It works well for those who are willing to participate. While the trip was sanctioned by the United States and the agenda approved by Cuba, the veil of politics is not so easily lifted.
  • The Embargo: This segment begins with Dr. Herminia Palenzuela who is chief of Clinical Medicine at the Pediatric Heart Center at the William Soler Pediatric Hospital in Havana. This center is the hub of a national network of pediatric cardiocenters, which have been key to the early detection and treatment of children with congenital heart problems. She articulates what it means to have the premier country for health technology – the United States – closed to Cuba for business. Since they have to go elsewhere for their medical devices and equipment, the costs are inevitably higher and in many cases prohibitive. The result is she cannot give her patients the best medicine has to offer. Next is Dr. Alex Carreras Pons a family doctor with a community practice associated with the Plaza de la Revolucion Community Polyclinic. In his practice the most prevalent disease is high blood pressure and the embargo hurts his ability to get his patients the drugs they need to manage it. Careen Foster is finishing her medical degree at the University of Colorado in Denver and is participating in the MEDICC (Medical Education Cooperation with Cuba) program. Some 300 students from 82 U.S. schools of medicine and public health have pursued rotations in Cuba through the program since 1998. Dr. Foster is working with a community physician in the Villa Clara area. She echos Dr. Pons concerns about the lack of hypertensive drugs and adds that front line antibiotics are also hard to get due to the embargo. As an American she displays exasperation with current U.S. policy. Dr. Raul Herrera Valdes is the director of the National Nephrology Institute. The institute level is the tertiary care level in Cuba, providing medical services but also charged with research. Nephrology or the study and treatment of kidney diseases is highly dependant on sophisticated technology and therefore has also been one of the fields most affected by the U.S. embargo. He gives the philosophical perspective on how Cuba decides to handle the problems created by the US embargo by emphasizing human talent over material riches. View – The Embargo
  • HIV/AIDS: Manuel Hernandez started the first AIDS prevention program in Cuba. He is now at the Center for STD-HIV prevention in Havana. The center was established in 1994 and works with young people across the country and with various groups identified as high risk. They have a library, computers, and a hotline where people can call and get information. A wall along the outside of the building is painted with scenes promoting safe sex and condom use. Hernandez says that while the Cuba HIV infection rate has been and is still very low they have always maintained a commitment to prevention. But Dr. Foster (see above) contends the numbers are most likely higher than what the government reports. Dr. Rigoberto Torres is an epidemiologist and gives a break down of these official numbers past and present. Dr. Jorge Perez is the current deputy director of the Pedro Kouri Institute of Tropical Medicine and was the founder of Cuba’s national AIDS program and director of the AIDS sanatorium for over a decade. He defends the numbers and says that Cuba will continue to fight to keep those numbers low. Dr. Ileana Artiles works for the National Center for Sex Education. She says a big concern of the center is the lack of condoms due to the fact that Cuba has no factory and has a lot of difficulty shipping them from abroad. For those already infected, Dr. Torres says just a little more than half can get the drugs they need to fight the disease and of those who do many get them from friends and relatives from other countries. View – HIV/AIDS
  • Primary Care:Providing Primary Care: Dr. Raul Herrera Valdes (see above for description) articulates why Cuba has made the delivery of primary care and hence preventive care the foundation of the health care system. Next Dr. Pons (see above) is seen leaving his home apartment that is located above his office. He talks about how valuable it is to live and work in the same place. Patients know where to find you anytime of the day or night. He also explains how doctors in Cuba keep records on their patients and how they are categorized. For his practice, the biggest problem is high blood pressure and he is continuing to see an increase in rates among his patients. Dr. Foster (see above) comments on the strong relationship Cuban doctors seem to have with the people of their community. The doctor s office is practically neighborhood hangout. And according to her the home visit that the doctor performs every afternoon as a part of their practice is an integral part of diagnosing and treating less obvious diseases and problems in the community. View – Primary Care
  • Natural Medicine: Dr. Henry Vazquez practices the full range of medicine in his rural practice in Boquerones, Cuba but the 27 year old is particularly proud of his use of natural medicines or herbs to treat his patients. As he walks around his herb garden behind his office and home, he talks about which plants treat which ailments. Dr. Pedro Rafael Regal is a specialist in rehabilitation at the 19 de Abril Community Polyclinic and an expert in complementary and alternative medicine. He comments on how Cuba has made a commitment to incorporate what they call natural and traditional medicine into standard medical therapy. Not only are they using herbs indigenous to their culture but they are also looking to traditional Chinese medicine such as acupuncture. Unlike in the rural areas where people can grow their own, in Havana there are herb merchants that can provide you with the ingredients you might need for a medicinal concoction. Dr. Jorge Sosa Gallardo also practices and does research at the 19 de Abril Community Polyclinic and he says that they are currently studying how treating asthma with natural remedies has reduced the dependence on steroids and therefore reduced the side effects association with them. He contends that the more they find out about the successful uses of natural medicine the more Cuba doctors will be encouraged to use them. View – Natural Medicine