Trends in U.S. Funding for HIV/AIDS

Published: Mar 1, 2004

 

 These updated documents, “Trends in U.S. Government Funding for HIV/AIDS,” provide an analysis of U.S. federal funding for HIV/AIDS since fiscal year (FY) 1981. The issue brief and chartpack present data and trends in the major categories of funding—care, cash and housing assistance, research, prevention, and global/international—over time. Cumulatively through its FY 2004, the US government has invested approximately $150 billion for domestic and international HIV/AIDS programs.

Issue Brief

 

Poll Finding

Military Families Survey, Toplines

Published: Mar 1, 2004

Military Families Survey

A recent survey conducted by The Washington Post, Kaiser Family Foundation, and Harvard University examines the views of Army spouses and their experiences with military life, including experiences with deployment and attitudes toward re-enlistment, as well as attitudes towards government and the media. The survey was conducted among spouses of active duty U.S. Army personnel serving on the ten largest U.S. Army bases.

Survey Toplines (.pdf)

Section 5: Structure of the Health Care Marketplace

Published: Mar 1, 2004

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next >

Exhibit 5.1: Health Care Employment and Share of Total Non-Farm Employment, 1990-2005p

Health care employment as a proportion of all non-farm employment has increased fairly steadily since the early 1990s. In 2005p, 9.2% of all workers, or 12.3 million people, held health care jobs, up from 7.5% (8.2 million) in 1990.

Health Care Employment

(object placeholder)

Notes: Not seasonally adjusted. Health Care Employment includes those who work in ambulatory health care services (NAICS code 621), hospitals (NAICS code 622), and nursing and residential care facilities (NAICS code 623).

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation calculations using data from Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics survey using the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), at http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm#data.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next >

clear.gif
button_browsing_abstract.gif
button_browsing_prev_sec.gif
button_browsing_next_sec.gif

Trends and Indicators in the Changing Health Care MarketplaceInformation provided by the Health Care Marketplace Project.Publication Number: 7031Information Updated: 02/08/06

2002 State and National Medicaid Spending Data

Published: Feb 29, 2004

(CMS-64)

This set of tables, prepared by the Urban Institute for the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, presents the most current state-by-state information on Medicaid spending by services using data from the Centers on Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) Form 64 for Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2002. CMS-64 data provide a somewhat different measure of spending than does the Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS). Please refer to the “Overview of Differences” document below for more on the features of each data source.

Full Set of Tables

Individual TablesTable 1: Medicaid Expenditures by Type of Service, FFY 2002Table 1a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Expenditures by Type of Service, FFY 2002Table 2: Expenditures on Acute Care Services, FFY 2002Table 2a: Percent Distribution of Expenditures on Acute Care Services, FFY 2002Table 3: Expenditures on Long-term Care Services, FFY 2002Table 3a: Percent Distribution of Expenditures on Long-term Care Services, FFY 2002

Overview of Differences between Data Sources: CMS-64 and MSIS

2000 State and National Medicaid Enrollment and Spending Data (MSIS)

Published: Feb 29, 2004

This set of tables, prepared by the Urban Institute for the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, presents state-by-state information on Medicaid enrollment, expenditures, and spending per enrollee for Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2000. These tables are based on analysis of data from the Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS) and provide a somewhat different measure of spending than CMS-64 data. Please see the “Overview of Differences” document below for more on the features of each data source.

Full Set of Tables

Individual TablesTable 1: Medicaid Enrollees by Group, FFY 2000Table 1a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Enrollees by Group, FFY 2000Table 2: Medicaid Payments Per Enrollee by Group, FFY 2000Table 3: Medicaid Payments by Service, FFY 2000Table 3a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments by Service, MSIS 2000Table 4: Medicaid Payments by Group, FFY 2000Table 4a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments by Group, FFY 2000Table 5: Medicaid Payments for Inpatient Hospital Services by Group, FFY 2000Table 5a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Inpatient Hospital Services by Group, MSIS 2000Table 6: Medicaid Payments for Nursing Facilities by Group, FFY 2000Table 6a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Nursing Facilities by Group, FFY 2000Table 7: Medicaid Payments for Prescribed Drugs by Group, FFY 2000Table 7a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Prescribed Drugs by Group, FFY 2000Table 8: Medicaid Payments for Physicians and Other Practitioners by Group, FFY 2000Table 8a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Physicians and Other Practitioners by Group, FFY 2000Table 9: Medicaid Payments for Outpatient Hospital and Clinic Services by Group, FFY 2000Table 9a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Outpatient Hospital & Clinic Services by Group, FFY 2000Table 10: Medicaid Payments for ICF-MR Services by Group, FFY 2000Table 10a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for ICF-MR Services by Group, MSIS 2000Table 11: Medicaid Payments for Mental Health Facilities by Group, FFY 2000Table 11a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Mental Health Facilities by Group, FFY 2000Table 12: Medicaid Payments for Managed Care by Group, FFY 2000Table 12a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Managed Care by Group, FFY 2000Table 13: Medicaid Payments for Home and Personal Care by Group, FFY 2000Table 13a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Home and Personal Care by Group, FFY 2000Table 14: Medicaid Payments for Other Services by Group, FFY 2000Table 14a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Other by Group, FFY 2000Table 15: Medicaid Payments for Unknown Services by Group, FFY 2000Table 15a: Percent Distribution of Medicaid Payments for Unknown Services by Group, FFY 2000

Table Notes

Overview of Differences between Data Sources: CMS-64 and MSIS

AIDS in America:  A Forgotten Epidemic? A Conference for News Leaders

Published: Feb 29, 2004

AIDS in America: A Forgotten Epidemic? A Conference for News Leaders

The Kaiser Media Fellowships Program, in partnership with the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism, hosts “AIDS in America: A Forgotten Epidemic? A Conference for News Leaders,” a conference for editors and news directors, Friday, March 19, to Sunday, March 21.

The conference includes presentations by David Satcher, M.D., former U.S. Surgeon General, Director of the National Center for Primary Care; Julie Gerberding, M.D., Director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control; Anthony Fauci, M.D., Director of the National Institutes on Health, and others and a discussion of “AIDS at 21: Media Coverage of the HIV Epidemic 1981-2002,” a comprehensive new Kaiser study published in the March/April edition of the Columbia Journalism Review.

The event will be held in the Foundation’s Barbara Jordan Conference Center in Washington, DC.

Agenda

AIDS at 21: Media Coverage of the HIV Epidemic 1981-2002,” Columbia Journalism Review

icon_presentations.gif

Presentation by Jennifer Kates, Director, HIV Policy, Kaiser Family Foundation Local View of the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in the United States

icon_presentations.gif

Glossary of Data and Terms

icon_reports_studies.gif

Columbia Journalism School’s Summary Report

The Kaiser Family Foundation and the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism presented a similar conference for journalists in 2002, “The Coverage of HIV/AIDS: What’s Next?” that focused on the global AIDS crisis.

Health Coverage and Access Challenges for Low-Income Women

Published: Feb 29, 2004

This issue brief examines low-income women’s health insurance coverage, experience with health plans and providers, and access to care. The analysis is based on data from the 2001 Kaiser Women’s Health Survey, a nationally representative survey of nearly 4,000 women between the ages of 18 and 64.

Issue Brief (.pdf)

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Women’s Health Coverage and Access to Care

Published: Feb 29, 2004

Using data from the 2001 Kaiser Women’s Health Survey, a nationally representative survey of nearly 4,000 women between the ages of 18 to 64, this issue brief explores racial and ethnic disparities in health care among women. It provides new information on the differences in health status, health insurance coverage, and selected measures of access to care across three racial/ethnic groups of women: African American, Latina, and white.

Issue Brief (.pdf)

Poll Finding

Health Care Experiences – 2002 National Survey of Latinos Survey Brief

Published: Feb 29, 2004

This survey brief of new analysis from the 2002 National Survey of Latinos examines Latinos experiences with health care in the United States. Topics discussed include coverage, accessing health care services, and communicating with health care providers.

Survey Brief (.pdf)

Coverage and Cost Impacts of the President’s Health Insurance Tax Credit and Tax Deduction Proposals

Published: Feb 29, 2004

This issue brief looks at the coverage impacts and costs of two components of the administration’s FY 2005 budget proposals to increase the affordability of health insurance: a new tax credit for people purchasing non-group health insurance and a new tax deduction for premiums for high-deductible, non-group health insurance policies.

The estimates were prepared by Jonathan Gruber, Ph.D., Professor of Economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, using a micro-simulation model developed in conjunction with the Kaiser Family Foundation. The model predicts how individuals and firms would respond to changes in the health insurance market induced by changes in government policy.

Issue Brief (.pdf)