The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.
Oct 1, 2024
Some higher-cost health conditions, like cancer, diabetes, or even pregnancy, left people trying to buy their own health coverage “uninsurable” before the Affordable Care Act. We estimated that 27% of nonelderly adults had at least one of these declinable health conditions.
Less severe conditions also posed barriers to insurance coverage. For example, depending on how many ear infections your child had last year, one insurer might have charged a 50% higher premium, while another would charge a condition-specific deductible, and yet another would deny coverage altogether. Certain jobs (like first responders) and activities (like rodeo participation) were also reasons to be charged more or denied coverage.
Both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris have said they would protect people with pre-existing health conditions, but their records vary. The Biden-Harris Administration built on the ACA framework, while Trump supported repeal efforts that would have, among other changes, loosened benefit mandates and scaled back subsidies. His administration also expanded short-term plans that discriminate against people with pre-existing conditions. More recently, Trump said he had “concepts of a plan” to replace Obamacare, with running mate J.D. Vance suggesting sicker people be moved into a separate risk pool, which could have the effect of lowering premiums (before subsidies) for healthier people, while raising premiums for sicker people.
There are certainly alternative ways to structure a health system that maintain protections for pre-existing conditions. And there are certainly ways the ACA could work better for sick people who might struggle with narrow provider networks or high deductibles.
It is worth a refresher on how the ACA protects people with pre-existing conditions. It’s also worth asking whether and how an alternative would do the same.
For more on how the ACA works, see KFF’s Affordable Care Act 101.