Status of Legal Challenges to HHS Title X Family Planning Rule as of July 2, 2019
Map detailing the status of litigation surrounding the new HHS Title X family planning rules, as of July 2, 2019.
View the Latest: Courts
Filter
-
-
Percent of Title X Clinics that are Planned Parenthood Clinics and/or Provide Abortions
Issue BriefThis map presents the share of Title X clinics that are Planned Parenthood clinics and/or provide abortions (as of 05/2019) and would no longer qualify for funding unless they separate from Planned Parenthood Federation of America or physically separate their abortion services from their family planning care.
-
Litigation Challenging Mandatory Stay at Home and Other Social Distancing Measures
Issue BriefThis issue brief explains the legal basis for stay at home orders and provides an overview of current legal challenges filed in state and federal courts.
-
Round 3: Legal Challenges to Contraceptive Coverage at SCOTUS
Issue BriefThis brief explains how the new regulations issued by the Trump Administration would change the contraceptive coverage requirement for employers and affect women’s coverage, the legal positions for challenging and defending these regulations, the potential rulings, and the broader ramifications.
-
Abortion Back at the Supreme Court: June Medical Services LLC v. Russo
Issue BriefThis issue brief explains the legal and factual issues in dispute and the reviews the potential implications of different rulings in the case of June Medical Services v. Russo, which could have significant implications for women’s access to abortion and could eliminate the right of abortion providers to bring legal challenges to state and federal laws and policies.
-
Abortion is Back at the Supreme Court: New Analysis of June Medical Services LLC v. Russo
News ReleaseA KFF brief explains June Medical Services LLC v. Russo, a challenge to a Louisiana abortion regulation that will be heard at the Supreme Court on March 4, 2020.
-
Provider Payment And Access To Medicaid Services: A Summary of CMS’ May 6 Proposed Rule
Issue BriefThis brief summarizes the major provisions of a rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that would set forth state requirements for ensuring access to care in state Medicaid programs. It would apply to fee-for-service Medicaid, but not to Medicaid managed care programs.
-
January 2012 Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: The ACA and the Supreme Court
PerspectiveAs the Supreme Court prepares to hear legal challenges to the health reform law in March, the latest Kaiser Health Tracking Poll shows that most Americans (59 percent) expect the Justices to base their ruling on their own ideological views rather than their interpretation of the law (28 percent).
-
Kaiser Poll: Early Reaction to Supreme Court Decision on ACA
PerspectiveFollowing last week's Supreme Court's decision upholding the heart of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), a majority of Americans (56 percent) now say they would like to see the law's detractors stop their efforts to block its implementation and move on to other national problems.
-
Is a Death Spiral Inevitable If There is No Mandate?
PerspectiveIf the Supreme Court acts within the next couple of weeks to overturn the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) while leaving the rest of the law intact, expect to hear a lot about how the individual insurance market will be destined for a "death spiral.