Charles Ornstein Article – Fourth in Series on How Firms Choose Health Plans

Published: Dec 30, 2002

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

Behind-scenes Look Shows How Firm Chose Health Plans

Fourth in an occasional series

12/24/2000

By Charles Ornstein Reprinted with permission of The Dallas Morning News

“Health insurance is obviously an important decision,” said Mr. Gilmore, 56, a vendor training coordinator for Verizon Communications Inc. “But it’s taken on a little bit less importance because we’ve been satisfied with Cigna, and my kids are older now and they’re both married and I don’t cover them with insurance anymore.”

Mr. Gilmore and many of his fellow employees took little more than a day to make decisions about health coverage, but three regional health-care managers spent eight months vetting health plans and negotiating contracts that will take effect Jan. 1.

The trio’s choices would have to satisfy the demands of 284,000 employees, retirees and their dependents of the former GTE Corp. while fitting within a whopping half-billion-dollar budget eventually approved by chairman and chief executive Charles R. Lee. This particular line item consumed nearly 8 percent of GTE’s operating income in 1999.

Along the way, the three managers encountered steep increases in medical and prescription drug costs, financially unstable HMOs and renewed efforts to reduce medical errors in hospitals.

Typically, employees don’t get to peek behind the veil of secrecy associated with benefits selection, receiving little information besides an enrollment kit each fall. But for this article, GTE provided exclusive and unprecedented access – and candidly discussed the factors that affected decision-making. That included access to internal meetings, visits with health insurers, company documents and employee interviews.

In the midst of an already complicated process, GTE underwent dramatic corporate changes. In one year, it divested itself of two units, spun off its wireless operations into a joint venture with Vodafone Group PLC, and merged with Bell Atlantic Corp. to form Verizon.

Privately, GTE’s benefits staff questioned whether they would even have jobs after the merger. Like many corporations, its partner Bell Atlantic relied heavily on consultants to select insurance programs.

A bad year

From the get-go, regional health-care manager George Crowling and his two colleagues at GTE knew this year would bring cost increases unseen during the mid- and late 1990s.

On a visit to mideastern Illinois, where GTE provides local phone service and employs about 400 people, Mr. Crowling was faced with a 60 percent premium increase for retirees by a local HMO called Health Alliance Medical Plans. That was on top of a 13 percent increase for active employees.

In St. Louis, industry colossus UnitedHealthcare demanded an increase of 29 percent to cover GTE employees across Missouri.

Mr. Crowling and his two co-workers logged nearly 100 visits with health plans this year, developing a strategy that responded to trends they saw across the country.

“They’re atypical in the way they do things,” said Larry Atkins, president of Health Policy Analysts Inc., a Washington-based benefits policy and consulting firm. “There probably are not a lot of companies out there really scouring these HMOs, turning them upside down, shaking them and then making decisions about which one they want to contract with.

“Most companies say: ‘We really don’t want to go to those lengths. If there’s an off-the-shelf product that somebody else is vetting that will meet our requirements, let’s do that.'”

In the 1999 benefit year, the company spent $548.7 million, or $3,653 for every employee and retiree – the same per capita amount paid in 1994. For this calendar year, the company expects costs to increase by about 5 percent.

As for 2001, the benefits year observed for this article, the company expects a net increase of 8 percent, on top of premium increases absorbed by salaried employees.

In the overall scheme of things, GTE’s medical spending will still look pretty good, compared with other large companies, said Mr. Crowling, regional health-care manager for Texas and 13 other states. But that doesn’t mean he and other executives aren’t worried by the trend.

Bruce Taylor, director of employee benefit policy and plans at the newly minted Verizon, brought home the magnitude of the cost increases during a September speech in Toronto.

Verizon, he said, will spend nearly $500 million per year on prescription drugs, including the amount spent by its HMOs. Conservatively, drug spending is increasing at 15 percent annually – or $75 million a year.

“That means … every time you go by a phone booth, a Verizon phone booth, I need to have 300 million more phone calls at 25 cents each just to pay for the increased costs for prescription drugs,” Mr. Taylor said. “If you let me take the price of the phone call up to 35 cents, then it goes down” to 214 million extra phone calls.

‘Wet cement’

On a rainy, unseasonably warm day in February, a team of 26 people crammed into a small, windowless conference room in Coppell to begin the selection process and set key dates in “wet cement.”

The group was divided between representatives of GTE and Hewitt Associates, the firm hired to administer GTE’s behind-the-scenes benefits process. Hewitt, based in Lincolnshire, Ill., processes paperwork, runs GTE’s customer service center, calculates its premium payments to HMOs and helps new employees enroll in the system.

The marching orders from the executive suite largely paralleled those of years past: Hold cost increases to less than 75 percent of the national average; improve employee satisfaction through external measurable means; and prevent labor disruptions over health care.

But the merger with Bell Atlantic prompted two new directives: Don’t make any major changes; and begin aligning plans with Bell Atlantic.

“We make sure that our employees are focused on beating our competitors as opposed to being distracted by hassles of health-care needs or delivery systems,” said Ezra Singer, Verizon’s executive vice president for human resources. “If they’re able to keep their eye on the competitive issue, that’s what we want.”

The job of keeping the benefits selection team on track fell to John Large, project manager for annual enrollment. “The process starts rolling,” he exhorted. “Everybody knows what they have to do.”

For the most part, Mr. Large was correct, and his team met most of the 115 key deadlines, 46 of them considered critical milestones. Among them: Complete a communications plan by the end of April. Identify health plans to drop by the end of June. Determine the company’s share of insurance premiums by the end of July.

All of this, of course, was designed to launch open enrollment for active employees on Oct. 6 and give the team time to notify employees whether they were required to change plans. The selection process ended Nov. 10.

Everybody at the meeting was conscious of the impending merger with Bell Atlantic, the big telephone provider on the East Coast. The deal would create the largest local phone company and move GTE headquarters from Irving to New York.

“We have a lot going on this year that we didn’t have going on last year,” one participant said.

Once the dust settled, members of the health-plan team received preliminary indications that their jobs were safe. Yet Verizon’s health-care strategy remains under development.

“What I want to do going forward is really take the best aspects of Bell Atlantic and GTE, and at the same time, look at what other companies are doing,” Mr. Singer said. “Whatever we do, I want to make sure that it’s sustainable and that it can last for a long while.”

‘An endless pit’

After the introductory meeting in February, the situation was largely quiet for the next couple of months, with teams working behind the scenes. Beginning in May, though, the health benefits managers began holding meetings with health plans, securing bids for 2001 premiums and making changes.

They also spent a good deal of time discussing prescription drug prices, which Verizon’s Mr. Taylor called an endless pit.

“There’s no such thing as too much resources dedicated to managing prescription drugs,” he said.

At their visits to the health plans, the regional health-care managers employed shortcuts to trim costs without sacrificing benefits. Mr. Crowling slightly lowered the premium increase for Health Alliance in Illinois by increasing the patients’ $10 co-payment for physician-office visits to $15. He also raised the price of some brand-name drugs to $15 from $10.

Mr. Crowling reduced the premium increase for United’s Missouri health plan by proposing to self-insure it. That means GTE, not United, would assume the risk for all of its employees’ medical claims. As a result, United reduced its increase to 19 percent, and it remained an insured product.

Using these methods and others, GTE officials said, they lowered its overall 2001 cost increase from an anticipated 11 percent to 8 percent.

The zipper

After Mr. Crowling and the other regional managers collect the data on the cost of the health plans, Mr. Taylor and GTE’s executives determine how much money the corporation will allocate for medical costs. Employees pay the remainder, under a complicated formula known as “the zipper.”

GTE assigns each health plan to one of 14 slots, based on quality and cost, and consumers pay a different amount – or nothing at all – based on where their health plan is assigned.

Employee contributions at GTE have increased slightly with time. The average employee and retiree paid $298 toward medical premiums in 1999, compared with $257 in 1994. The average includes union members, who represent about half of GTE’s workforce, even though they do not contribute to premiums.

Even excluding union members, however, GTE officials said their employees pay lower premiums than employees at most national corporations.

In late August, the curtain rose on the selection process when GTE distributed its first reminders about open enrollment and a wallet-size card with a personal access number for the Internet and automated telephone systems. The benefits staff followed up with an e-mail reminder to all employees.

But several steps remained. Hewitt arranged for the printing, collating and mailing of millions of pages of information. The material went out in three cycles, with about 50,000 people in each wave.

Union workers came first and received a full enrollment kit, complete with descriptions of available health plans. Retirees received a similar package.

Salaried workers got a two-page letter directing them to one of three routes: the Internet, the automated phone system or a request for a full enrollment kit. Of the 42,000 people who received the letter, only 2,000 requested a hard-copy kit.

Any employee or retiree who changed plans had to be sent a subsequent letter confirming any changes. GTE officials say 85 percent of active employees made no changes at all. Of the rest, 58 percent made changes online.

Gail Morgan was one of the employees who decided against making any changes, sticking with Cigna.

“I guess if I had problems with them – if it took me a week to get in to see my doctor every time I called – then I’d probably be looking at the other plans,” said Ms. Morgan, 51, who works on the company’s regulatory filings. “As long as I’m happy with them and don’t have any problems, I don’t even compare the other plans.”

Even though they don’t know the intricacies of the process, employees said they can imagine that the benefits selection process takes a while.

“It wouldn’t surprise me if they’re already working on next year’s,” Ms. Morgan said.

Boston Interns 2002

Published: Dec 30, 2002

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

2002 Kaiser Media Internships Program:

Week 12 program-August 18-21, 2002 Boston, MA Accommodations: Sheraton Commander Hotel, 16 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138

Sunday, August 18, 20026:00pm:Dinner, Sheraton Commander Hotel Minuteman Room Review of the Internship, preview television intern tapesMonday, August 19, 20028:00am: Continental breakfast, The 16 Garden Street Restaurant 9:00am: Board bus from hotel to go to Harvard School of Public Health (Contact: Terri Mendoza)677 Huntington Avenue, Kresge Building, Room 1109:30-10:20am:Environmental Health: The Health Public Housing InitiativeJonathan Levy, Sc.D., Assistant Professor of Environmental Health & RiskAssessment, Departments of Environmental Health and Health Policy Management, Harvard School of Public Health10:30-11:20am:Tuberculosis Control:Claire Murphy, Community Development Coordinator, Tuberculosis Control Program, Boston Public Health Commission11:30-12:20pm: College Alcohol Study: Toben Nelson, Assistant Director of Program Evaluation for the College Alcohol Study, Department of Health & Social Behavior, Harvard School of Public Health12:30-1:30pm:LuncheonProgram Adjourns1:30pm:Depart Harvard; Walk to New England Journal of MedicineHarvard Medical School Library, Countway Library, 10 Shattuck Street 2:00-3:00pm:Meet with Dr. Gregory Curfman, Executive Editor and other invited editors3:15pm:Board bus for hotel3:30 onwards:Read 2002 Interns clips book6:30pm:Meet in hotel lobby; board bus6:45pm:Dinner: The Helmand, 143 First StreetTuesday, August 20, 2002 8:30am:Continental breakfast, Minuteman Room 9:00-11:30:Review of Video Tapes for Television Interns:–George Strait, former Medical Correspondent, ABC Television News–Callie Crossley, former Health and Medical Producer, 20/20, ABC Television12:00pmBoard bus at hotel12:30pm Working lunch with The Boston Globe health/science teamThe Boston Globe, 135 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 021072:30pm:Board bus (Dan’s Coach Service)3:00-5:00pm:Site Visit, Boston Healthcare for the Homeless, Barbara McInnis House,461 Walnut Avenue, Jamaica Plain, BostonBob Taube, Executive Director and Dr. Jim O Connell5:00 pm:Adjourn Board bus to hotel 6:30pm:Meet in hotel lobby; board bus7:00pm:Dinner: Filippo Ristorante (with invited Boston reporters) 283 Causeway Street, Boston, MA Wednesday, August 21, 2002** Please note Please pack and check out of your room before breakfast; bring your luggage with youto the Minuteman room, or check with hotel bellstand.**8:30 am:Continental breakfast, Minuteman room 9:00am sharp:Clip Review Session:–Paul Delaney, Director, Initiative on Racial Mythology, and Member, National Advisory Committee, Kaiser Media Fellowships Program –Madge Kaplan, Senior Health Desk Editor, Marketplace Radio/WGBH–Phil Hilts, Health/Science Reporter, Boston Bureau, New York Times 12:00pm:Buffet lunchEvaluations & Wrap Up1:30pm:Board bus at hotel for Airport (Dan’s Coach Service)

————————–

Recent Fellows’ Work

Published: Dec 30, 2002

:

  • John Cutter, freelance health/aging writer, St. Petersburg, FL
  • Robert Davis, medical and science writer, USA Today
  • Fred de Sam Lazaro, correspondent, The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer; executive producer; KTCA-Twin Cities Public Television, St. Paul, MN
  • Mason Essif, segment producer, HealthWeek-PBS, Washington, DC
  • Don Finley, science, medicine and environment editor, The San Antonio Express-News
  • Merrill Goozner, freelance journalist and associate professor of journalism, New York University
  • Andrew Julien, health/medical writer, The Hartford Courant
  • Madge Kaplan, Health Desk Editor/Boston Bureau Chief, Marketplace Radio/WGBH
  • Sarah Lunday, health care industry reporter, The Fort Worth Star-Telegram
  • Joan Mazzolini, investigative reporter, The Plain Dealer, Cleveland
  • Andy Miller, health care business reporter, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
  • Charles Ornstein, health business reporter, The Dallas Morning News
  • Joe Palca, correspondent, science desk, National Public Radio
  • Jon Palfreman, senior producer, FRONTLINE
  • Christopher Ringwald, demographics and mental health reporter, The Times Union (Albany, NY)
  • Neil Rosenberg, senior medical reporter, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
  • Karl Stark, health care business reporter, The Philadelphia Inquirer
  • Brenda Wilson, correspondent and editor for public health, healh policy and medicine, National Public Radio
  • Linda Wright Moore, editorial writer, The Philadelphia Daily News

John Cutter, freelance health/aging writer, St. Petersburg, FL Project: Alzheimer’s disease–prevention research, access to new treatments, and the impact of the disease on patients and their families.

Forgetful, Fearing Alzheimer’s and Hoping for a Cure, New York Times, June 24, 2001.

Living with Alzheimer’s, Copley News Service, June 20, 2001.

Importing Prescription Drugs Potentially Dangerous Rx, Copley News Service, June 13, 2001.

‘Safe’ Does Not Mean ‘Risk-Free’ to FDA, Copley News Service, June 6, 2001.

Progress on Prescription Issue Will Require Give and Take, Copley News Service, February 07, 2001.


Robert Davis, medical and science writer, USA Today Project: Variations in the nation’s emergency medical systems and their impacts on survival rates.

Speeding to the rescue can have deadly results, USA Today, March 21, 2002.

Health care, without question, USA Today, September 6, 2001.


Fred de Sam Lazaro, correspondent, The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer; executive producer; KTCA-Twin Cities Public Television, St. Paul, MNProject: The role of international medical graduates in providing health care in under-served urban centers and rural areas in the U.S.

Going Home: U.S.-trained foreign doctors and the countries they’ve left behind, The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, August 23, 2002

Foreign Country Doctors: The effect of doctors with degrees from overseas institutions on the U.S. health care system, The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, June 18, 2002.


Mason Essif, segment producer, HealthWeek-PBS, Washington, DC Project: The e-revolution in health care–how the Internet is affecting access and quality of health information, communication between providers and patients, and medical commerce.

E-service Keeps Doctors, Patients in Touch, CNN, April 9, 2001.

A Reporter’s Notebook: Perspective on the April 2001 Fellows’ sitevisit to Cuba.


Don Finley, science, medicine and environment editor, The San Antonio Express-News Project: Obesity in the U.S.

The Supersize Crisis: Obesity in America,, a six-part series, The San Antonio Express-News, December 8-15, 2002.


Merrill Goozner, freelance journalist and associate professor of journalism, New York University Project: The sources and costs of pharmaceutical innovation.

Medicine as a Luxury, The American Prospect, Volume 13, Issue 1. January 1-14, 2001.


Andrew Julien, health/medical writer, The Hartford CourantProject: The influence of social and economic forces on children’s health”

GenStress: A Landscape of Pain,” a four-part series, The Hartford Courant, December 15-18, 2002.


Madge Kaplan, Health Desk Editor/Boston Bureau Chief, Marketplace Radio/WGBH Project: Investigating changes in the health care workforce and their impact on health care delivery and patient care.

When a Heart Rebels: How Health Care Got a Primary Nurse, WGBH, Boston.


Sarah Lunday, health care industry reporter, The Fort Worth Star-Telegram Project: The impact of prescription drugs on the health care industry–financial, ethical, medical and political.

Alcon Receives Warning from FDA: Problems Involving Test Batches are Fixed, Drug Manufacturer Says, Dallas Morning News, December 9, 2000.


Joan Mazzolini, investigative reporter, The Plain Dealer, Cleveland Project: VA health care–how well are veterans’ medical centers serving those who served us?

In Harm’s Way: Some 4 million veterans depend on the Veterans Affairs health system, but attempts to reform the system have been thwarted.


Andy Miller, health care business reporter, The Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionProject: Indoor air quality and its effects on health in the home and workplace.

Sick Buildings: A Special Report


Charles Ornstein, health business reporter, The Dallas Morning NewsProject: The evolving role of employers in the health care system-what role should they play in providing benefits for employees, retirees and their families?

Pension Fund Giant Feels Bite of Medical Inflation: Heavyweight Faces Tougher Health Care Negotiations, Dallas Morning News, March 25, 2001.

Behind-scenes Look Shows How Firm Chose Health Plans, Dallas Morning News, December 24, 2000.

Sleuths Scope Out Benefits: GTE Seeks Quality at the Right Price, Dallas Morning News, December 24, 2000.

Experiments Shifting Decisions on Health-care Plans to Workers, Dallas Morning News, October 15, 2000.

Insurance Grew From a Luxury to Entitlement, Dallas Morning News, May 14, 2000.

Drowning In Expenses, Dallas Morning News, May 14, 2000.

Premiums Put Squeeze On Workers, Dallas Morning News, April 2, 2000.

Bridging Benefit Gaps, Dallas Morning News, April 2, 2000.

Texas Trying To Pass More Costs To State Workers, Dallas Morning News, April 2, 2000.


Jon Palfreman, senior producer, FRONTLINEProject: The development, marketing, and pricing of prescription drugs.

The Other Drug War,” FRONTLINE, June 19, 2003.


Christopher Ringwald, demographics and mental health reporter, The Times Union (Albany, NY)Project: The challenges and debate facing alcoholism and addiction treatment programs; what works, why, and how to measure results.

The Soul of Recovery: Uncovering the Spiritual Dimension in the Treatment of Addictions, Oxford University Press-USA 2002.


Neil Rosenberg, senior medical reporter, The Milwaukee Journal SentinelProject: Differences in health care treatment due to race, gender and age

Racial Gaps Found in Access to Transplants, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, April 16, 2001.

Separate and Unequal: U.S. Practices a System of Medicine that Shortchanges Minorities and Women, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, April 16, 2001.

Racial Gaps Found in Access to Transplants, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, April 16, 2001.

Sources from Neil Rosenberg’s Project on Race, Gender and Age.


Joe Palca, correspondent, science desk, National Public RadioProject: How clinical trials work-the ethical, medical, financial and societal issues involved

Clinical Drug Trials Helpful or Harmful? Dilemma of Using Drugs to Prevent Diseases in People Who are at Risk but Otherwise Healthy, Especially When the Drugs Have Serious Side Effects, National Public Radio, March 21, 2001.

Continuing Fight on Capitol Hill over a Patients Bill of Rights, National Public Radio, May 11, 2000.


Karl Stark, health care business reporter, The Philadelphia InquirerProject: The quality of medical care–what data can really help doctors provide high quality treatment, and help patients find good care?

In Philadelphia, Malpractice Awards have ‘Gone Haywire’, The Philadelphia Inquirer, November 16, 2000.

Medical Changes Proposed by Firms:A Group Representing Large Companies Says its Three Suggestions Could Save 60,000 Lives a Year, The Philadelphia Inquirer, November 16, 2000.

Taking the Pulse of Medicine: A Local Start-up Offers Ratings of Doctors and Hospitals on the Web. It Sells Them to Employers. The Philadelphia Inquirer, November 6, 2000.


Brenda Wilson, correspondent and editor for public health, health policy and mediciane, National Public Radio Project: AIDS and HIV prevention efforts in South Africa=attitudes toward sexuality, Western medicine, death and disease-and the implications for the U.S.

Sisters Against AIDS, Heart and Soul, December/January 2001


Linda Wright Moore, editorial writer, The Philadelphia Daily News Project: Disparities in health status and access to medical care between black and white Americans.

At the Heart of Race and Health Care, Philadelphia Daily News, November 27, 2000.

Public Education Partnerships: Program on Public Health Information and Partnerships

Published: Dec 30, 2002

Program on Public Health Information and Partnerships

The Foundation’s Program on Public Health Information and Partnerships serves as a resource for the public and media on public health issues. A particular focus is on reaching young people with information about reproductive and sexual health issues, such as HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases, contraception and unintended pregnancy. Other recent public education campaigns have addressed parent-child communication, raised awareness about the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for low-income families, and helped to bridge the digital divide.

Our primary means of reaching the public with critical health information is through public health partnerships with leading media organizations. Current and recent partners include leading television networks such as MTV, CBS, Nickelodeon, Univision, BET, and UPN, and popular consumer magazines such as Essence and Latina (Essence Communications), Family Circle, Glamour, Self, seventeen, Teen People and YM. We also have two general campaigns: Talking with Kids About Tough Issues, a national initiative to support families, and It’s (Your) Sex Life, a print and online initiative to provide information on sexual health issues.

Our partnerships are multi-faceted efforts that use a range of approaches to getting out the information. In addition to customized public service messages, special joint programming and editorial, we also provide extensive resource and referral services for those seeking additional information. We create customized free resources – print and online -that are distributed through dedicated toll-free hotlines and/or websites, which tag all our messages and programming. The Foundation works collaboratively with its partners providing both expert substantive support as well as financial support for research, production and campaign operations.

Through the Kaiser Public Health Advertising Partnership the Foundation has the capacity to develop our own public service messages from concept to final product. We work with leading creative and production companies – or, in some instances, with the in-house production teams at a partner network – to develop high-quality, high-impact public service messages. Our PSAs do not look like typical PSAs. We work collaboratively with our media partners to develop creative that will most effectively reach our target audience, and we secure placement that will maximize visibility. To inform our message development, we regularly conduct surveys, focus groups and other communications research, so that we can better understand what our audiences know as well as how they learn about these issues.

The Program also serves as a general resource for public health information for the media. Our main effort in this area is the New York city-based Kaiser Media Resource Project on Reproductive and Sexual Health, which serves as on-call resource and provides technical assistance for journalists. The Kaiser Media Resource Project also develops fact sheets, issue updates, and other information pieces on a range of sexual health issues as well as conducts a quarterly briefing series for journalists on Emerging Issues in Reproductive Health.

Tina Hoff, Vice President and Director, Program on Public Health Information & Partnerships

Media Fellow Lunday article on Alcon Laboratories

Published: Dec 30, 2002

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

Alcon Receives Warning from FDA

Problems Involving Test Batches are Fixed, Drug Manufacturer Says

12/09/2000

By Sarah LundayReprinted with permission of The Dallas Morning News

Alcon Laboratories Inc. has received a warning letter from federal regulators, saying the drug maker failed to meet several quality and safety standards during a recent inspection.

The problems could alter the purity of the company’s products, according to the Nov. 17 letter from the Food and Drug Administration.

Alcon, a subsidiary of Swiss-based Nestle SA, produces eye-care products and technologies, including surgical instruments, prescription drugs and contact lens care products. It employs 2,600 people at its Fort Worth facility.

Company spokeswoman Mary Dulle said the problems found during the inspection involved test batches of products that would not have been distributed to consumers. She also said that Alcon has since remedied those problems.

“We absolutely believe that there is no possibility of contamination of our product,” Ms. Dulle said.

FDA investigators who visited Alcon’s drug and device manufacturing plant in October documented “serious deviations” from the agency’s regulations governing manufacturing quality, according to the letter.

Michael Chappell, Dallas district director for the FDA, said the Alcon case continues as an open investigation until regulators review the company’s corrections.

“We don’t necessarily consider the matter closed until we go back and check that they follow the criteria they said they would and that it would actually solve the problem,” Mr. Chappell said Friday – the date specified in the letter as the deadline for Alcon to fix the defects.

Ms. Dulle declined to discuss the products involved in the testing cited by FDA inspectors.

The warning letter cited several areas of concern, including:

•Failing to clean, maintain and sanitize equipment to prevent malfunctions or contamination.

•Failing to establish appropriate written procedures to prevent microbial contamination in drug products.

•Failing to assure and document that automated equipment used in manufacturing, processing, packaging and holding of drug products will perform its intended function.

Ms. Dulle said any problems investigators found were related to manufacturing lines that were being used for testing at the time of the inspection. Still, Alcon acted quickly to fix problems, Ms. Dulle said.

“It’s a warning letter, so they’re trying to bring something to your attention in a big way,” Ms. Dulle said. “We’re really trying to work with FDA so we don’t get these letters.”

The company has received two other warning letters since 1998 on separate incidents. In both cases, Alcon responded quickly and the cases were closed satisfactorily, Ms. Dulle said.

Linda Wright Moore Article – Race and Health Care

Published: Dec 30, 2002

The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

At the Heart of Race and Health Care

11/27/00

By Linda Wright Moore Reprinted with permission of Philadelphia Daily News

Dr. Charles Bridges, assistant professor of surgery at Penn’s medical school and clinical director of cardiac surgery at Pennsylvania Hospital, understands that racial disparities in health care are much more than skin deep.

That premise is clear in his latest research, a study of differences in the death rates of blacks and whites who undergo coronary bypass surgery. His study was published last week in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Bridges and his colleagues found that fewer than 4 percent of all patients studied died as result of coronary artery bypass surgery – but that black patients were 29 percent more likely to die than whites. And that’s even when other known risk factors, such as age, kidney failure and heart failure, were taken into account.

So what’s going on?

“Race is probably a marker for other biological variables that may have to do with cell function that protects people from heart disease,” Bridges hypothesized.

“These cells may work differently in some black patients, so that they tend to have less protection and more severe heart disease at an earlier age. . .So blacks may have higher mortality, not because they are black, but because of a different biology.”

That biological difference might be shared by some black people – and by people of other races as well.

But to sort it all out will require more research.

Expensive, extensive research. And on Wednesday President Clinton signed into law a measure that could help fund research like Charles Bridges’.

The new law could be a foundation and a first step toward eliminating wide and persistent health disparities that cause millions of Americans to live sicker and die sooner than most of their fellow citizens.

First introduced in June 1999 by U.S. Rep. Jesse L. Jackson Jr., D-Ill., the legislation that became the Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Education Act of 2000 was strongly supported by Democrats. But the proposal was almost derailed when conservative House Republicans circulated a memo claiming the bill contained “several racial set-asides and quotas” for grant and loan programs.

The bill was rescued by Republican Sen. Bill Frist, who represents a Tennessee constituency of low-income blacks and Appalachian whites. Frist expanded the bill to include all health disparities – including those experienced by poor whites.

Now, the new law calls for:

Annual spending of at least $100 million for research on health disparities.

$50 million for studies to identify causes of health disparities and explore strategies for eliminating them.

$21 million for education programs to help doctors learn techniques of “culturally competent” care.

Unspecified funding for repayment of educational loans to health professionals who conduct research on minority health or health disparities.

Add in the budget of the existing Office of Research on Minority Health and the total for research into how race affects health is nearly $250 million per year.

“To address this problem with a more targeted approach, we need better data and understanding of the factors that drive the problem,” said Marsha Lillie-Blanton, an African-American who is vice president of the Kaiser Family Health Foundation, where she directs policy research and grants on access to care for vulnerable populations.

“In the past, most researchers studying us were not people who understand us and our communities. This [new law] will train minority researchers and invest in research targeting the needs and problems of minority and disadvantaged communities.”

Money and a solid hypothesis drive research. Along with new dollars under the minority health and disparities law, the nonprofit Center for the Advancement of Health recently announced a $1.5 million pilot program funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, “to train a new generation of minority scientists” to research and solve disparities in health care.

These new resources will enable scientists like Charles Bridges to expand their research.

“We need to systematically investigate biological differences that we found in black patients, such as more severe heart disease at a younger age,” Bridges said. “We also need long-term studies. What about one-year or five-year or 10-year mortality? That would take years, and it would be expensive.”

Expensive and complicated – because, even if race is a factor in medical outcomes, it’s not in itself an answer to the question of eliminating racial disparities in health. “We cannot treat race, but we can treat biological factors,” Bridges pointed out.

So it becomes essential to figure out how biology, poverty, access and culture apply to minority health by asking an array of questions that have clinical and social implications.

“We need to look at the influence of socioeconomic variables,” Bridges said. “Are blacks getting service from the same surgeons as everyone else, or does a certain, limited group of surgeons treat blacks? Are there differences that correlate to where blacks live and the quality of care available in their communities?”

The only downside to the creation of a center devoted to minority health is the risk of “ghetto-izing” research on minorities into a niche with minimal funding, Lillie-Blanton said. The $250 million authorized to begin studying minority health and health disparities is just 1.4 percent of annual National Institute of Health spending.

“It’s not the answer, but it provides an opportunity we haven’t had before to develop research by people who are more knowledgable about our community,” said Lillie-Blanton. “It’s information that will help to leverage what kinds of research should be done in the other divisions of NIH, with larger sums of money.”

The other big problem underlying the issue of health disparities is access – the problem of being less likely to be referred for bypass surgery, heart transplants, angioplasty or catheterization.

“We need to educate physicians and patients about the benefits of these interventions,” said Bridges, “especially where there is no economic barrier to paying for the procedure.”

Bridges said often poor communication between doctor and patient results in less aggressive care for some minority patients, but attitudes about race are also a factor. “We cannot deny that there is a difference in physician attitudes that gets manifest as patient access,” Bridges said. “I have had several African-American patients who, prior to meeting me, had declined to have surgery.

“When I was able to communicate to them the risks, benefits and alternatives in a manner which they found clearer, less threatening and more sensitive to their views, in several cases they agreed to undergo procedures that were necessary.”

One component of the new law specifically calls for education efforts in “culturally competent” care, to help doctors – who are primarily white and male – learn to more effectively treat patients who will be, increasingly, non-white as the nation’s demographics shift in the 21st century.

Along with money, research takes time. And so does changing the way patients are treated. For now, according to Bridges, the best way to reduce race-based disparities in health is for patients and doctors to decide on the appropriateness of heart surgery and other cardiac treatments based on “established clinical data, independent of race.”

Dr. Thomas LaVeist, a professor and researcher at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, is also studying the touchy issue of why whites and blacks get different treatment for cardiac problems.

“The new resources that will flow from the center for minority health are important for researchers who have been toiling for years in the area of disparities in health, and haven’t been able to get the support they need,” LaVeist said.

“Although the center itself has a relatively modest budget now, hopefully, that budget will grow.”

Kaiser Media Fellowships program: Poynter Institute program, 2001

Published: Dec 30, 2002

2001/02 Kaiser Media Fellowships program:Poynter Institute program on computer-assisted health reportingMonday, November 12-Wednesday, November 14, 2001

Location: The Poynter Institute for Media Studies, 801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 (Tel: 727-821-9494; fax: 727-821-0583; www.poynter.org)Hotel accommodations: The Hilton Hotel, 333 1st Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 (Tel: 727-894-5000; fax: 727-894-7655)

Program Faculty

  • Mike Wendland, Poynter Institute Fellow; Technology Columnist, The Detroit Free Press, Wendland’s High Tech Talk, NBC-TV News Channel’s weekly technology reports, and CBS-WXYT Radio/Detroit weekly call-in show on computers and the Internet. Former on-air reporter, WDIV-TV/Detroit (1980-98); investigative reporter, The Detroit News (1970-80); author “Wired Journalists: Newsroom Guide to the Internet” published 1996 by the Radio and Television News Directors Foundation;
    • Internet reporting
  • Debbie Wolfe, Technology Training Editor, St. Petersburg Times
    • Spreadsheet reporting
  • Chris Adams, reporter, Washington D.C. bureau, The Wall Street Journal (1995/96 Kaiser Media Fellow)
    • Case studies: using a major health care database–what to look for, how to handle the data, how to use it in reporting. Including reporting for the award-winning 1995/96 New Orleans Times-Picayune series on health care fraud and nursing home scams in Louisiana, and reporting for the Wall Street Journal on the FDA.

PROGRAM Breakfast will be available in the hotel restaurant from 6:30am onwards. The Poynter Institute is approximately 10 minutes walk from the hotel. There will be an informal buffet lunch each day at the Poynter Institute. Dress is casual.

Sunday, November 11

7:00pm: Introduction to program/Dinner–Mike Wendland Bayview Room (15th floor), The Hilton Hotel

Monday, November 12

9:00am-5:00pm: The Poynter Institute, computer room –Internet reporting, Part 1: Mike Wendland –Introduction to spreadsheets, Part 1: Debbie Wolfe –Using spreadsheets for a story: Chris Adams –Downloading from the Internet: Mike Wendland/Debbie Wolfe 6:40pm: Walk from hotel 7:00pm: Dinner, Bertoni’s restaurant, 16 Second Street North (Tel: 727-822-5503)

Tuesday, November 13

9:00am-5:00pm: The Poynter Institute, computer room –Introduction to spreadsheets, Part 2: Debbie Wolfe –Internet reporting, Part 2: Mike Wendland –Case studies: Chris Adams –Data clean-up 6:40pm: Walk from hotel 7:00pm: Dinner, Moon Under Water, 332 Beach Drive NE, (Tel: 727-896-6160)

Wednesday, November 14

9:00am-3:00pm: The Poynter Institute, computer room –Introduction to spreadsheets, Part 3: Debbie Wolfe –Organizing and managing computer-assisted reporting projects: Mike Wendland –Wrap up pm: Fellows Depart

Media Fellow Ornstein Patchwork care article

Published: Dec 30, 2002

Bridging Benefit Gaps

Patchwork care makes health solution elusive

04/02/2000

By Charles Ornstein Reprinted with permission of The Dallas Morning News

Although the vast majority of Americans receive health insurance through their employers, by no means is the quality of coverage the same.

Just ask Harry and Louise.

The fictional middle-aged couple – created by the nation’s insurance lobby – helped undermine public confidence in President Clinton’s health-care reform proposal through a series of television commercials in 1993-94.

Sitting around a kitchen table and driving in a car, Harry and Louise voiced the fears of middle-class workers that their coverage would suffer if the government extended health insurance to all Americans.

It is this patchwork system of health insurance – Cadillac benefits for some, nothing for others – that helped doom any hope of a comprehensive national solution, industry experts say.

When given a choice, they say, people generally won’t sacrifice an insurance benefit or two – or pay more – so that others can improve their lot.

“The problem with health care is that it’s very easy to divide and conquer, just because people have such different interests and different fears and different experiences,” said Darrell West, a political science professor at Brown University in Providence, R.I. His book, The Sound of Money, examines the effect of Harry and Louise on the Clinton health-care reform debate.

“The fear was that we would end up with a lowest-common- denominator health-care system,” Mr. West said. “In elevating the poorest elements within society, we might in the process lower the quality of the care received by others.”

Complicating matters, he and other researchers say, are the many classes within the insured population.

At one end of the spectrum, some workers don’t contribute a dime toward health insurance. At the opposite end, others have insurance but rarely seek care because they can’t afford the deductibles.

And on the margins lie one in six Americans, or 44.3 million citizens, many of whom hold jobs that do not offer health insurance.

Each group has its own fears and experiences, and rarely do their priorities coincide.

The lucky ones

Individuals with the richest health insurance benefits typically belong to labor unions.

These workers have coverage starting with the first dollar, so they don’t pay any money toward either their premium or doctor visits.

Because of this, union members have opposed employers’ efforts to shift costs to them. Earlier this year, 17,000 engineers at Boeing Co. in Seattle went on strike for 40 days because the company asked employees to pay a share of their medical premiums. The company relented last month and agreed to continue paying those costs.

“Ultimately, it’s part of us looking at our benefits package and saying, ‘What do we need to do to attract and retain workers?'” said Nancy Cannon, director of employee benefits.

Union negotiator Stan Sorscher said the proposal would have cost the average Boeing family $1,500 per year. Union members, he maintained, have accepted below-market wages for years to maintain their rich level of benefits.

“We thought this was just the start,” said Mr. Sorscher, a physicist at Boeing. “If 10 percent premiums were a good idea, then 15 percent premiums would be an even better idea. … There was an open-ended threat to us.”

The vast middle class

Many of the 155 million Americans with employer-provided health insurance are like Diane M. Johnson, a 41-year-old manufacturing specialist at Texas Instruments Inc.

Ms. Johnson, who is enrolled in the NYLCare HMO, pays a share of her premium every two weeks, in addition to copayments for doctor visits and prescription drugs. She says her top consideration when choosing a health plan is cost.

“If you’re like me and you have several prescriptions, it starts adding up fast,” says Ms. Johnson, who has severe asthma.

Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics show that Ms. Johnson’s experience is hardly unique. In 1997, 69 percent of employees with individual coverage were required to contribute to their premiums, up from 26 percent in 1980.

The percentage of employees who contribute to family coverage grew to 80 percent from 46 percent in 1980.

“The numbers of companies that used to provide free family coverage was pretty high 10 years ago,” said Edith Rasell, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, D.C. “Now almost no companies provide free family coverage.”

Young and restless

By and large, employees who are young and healthy are less concerned about health coverage than stock options, career advancement and personal satisfaction.

The Internet generation enjoys such perks as free massages, discounts at workout facilities and catered lunches. As for health insurance, “that’s not something they’re as concerned about as long as they know that they’re covered,” says Julie Muenzler, human resources manager for imc2, a 100-person Internet services company in Dallas.

When imc2 asked employees for benefit suggestions at an annual retreat last year, they responded by requesting dry cleaning pick-up at the office, more vacation time, additional floating holidays and stress management programs.

Mike Keller, a 27-year-old graphic designer at imc2, said when choosing his current job, he was impressed by the casual dress code, the free Coke machine and the rock-climbing wall.

Mr. Keller, who graduated from the University of North Texas, said he asked about health insurance benefits before he accepted his job, but that’s the extent of his research.

“I’m glad I have it; I just don’t use it,” he said. “As a matter of fact, I picked the wrong doctor to treat me. I picked a pediatrician on accident. I’ve been healthy my whole life – thank God – and I haven’t really needed all that.”

The small-business crowd

Because small businesses don’t have the purchasing clout of their larger brethren, they often don’t provide comparable health benefits.

Only 55 percent of firms with fewer than 10 workers offered benefits last year, according to a report by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust. That compares with 99 percent of firms with more than 200 workers.

What’s more, small businesses that offer insurance are feeling the brunt of increased medical costs, and they are shifting the burden to their employees.

Jim Kollaja, for example, pays 50 percent of the cost of insurance for workers at his family-owned woodworking business in Corpus Christi. When this year’s higher rates took effect, the company charged workers 12 percent more for single coverage and 26 percent more for family coverage.

The company’s trade association reports that about half of similar firms offered health insurance for full-time shop employees in 1998.

“A lot of companies opt not to carry it, not to hassle with it,” said Mr. Kollaja, vice president of Imperial Mill and Fixtures Inc. “We look at it as what we need to have in order to compete for the best employees.”

Imperial is routinely turned down by insurance companies because several of its 30 employees have chronic medical conditions that are expensive to treat.

“It’s kind of a love-hate relationship. I hate my insurance company, but I can’t do without them.”

The gray and threatened

The people most affected by changes in health insurance are early retirees who are not yet eligible for Medicare.

A recent study by the consulting firm William M. Mercer Inc. found that the percentage of large companies offering benefits to this group has fallen each of the last six years, to 35 percent in 1999 from 46 percent in 1993.

Thousands of retirees have sued their former employers, saying officials reneged on earlier promises to provide them health benefits for life.

But courts have generally ruled that companies are entitled to reduce or even eliminate benefits as long as they reserve the right to do so in writing.

Pabst Brewing Co. in Milwaukee terminated health benefits to 774 retirees in September 1996. For those not eligible for Medicare, comparable coverage cost as much as $8,200, according to a 1997 government report.

Andy DeRuiter retired from Pabst in early 1995 after 23 years. Sixteen months before he was eligible for Medicare, Pabst terminated the retiree benefits. As a result, Mr. DeRuiter went uninsured, relying on free drug samples from his doctor to treat his high blood pressure and chest pains.

“When we retired, they told everybody, ‘You retire now, and you’re set for life,'” Mr. DeRuiter, now 67, says. “That was a big lie.”

The uninsured

Despite public perceptions to the contrary, 84 percent of the 44.3 million uninsured Americans are workers or members of a working family. And a full 20 percent have access to employer-paid health benefits on the job.

Standing in the way of coverage, researchers say, is low-income workers’ inability to afford their share of monthly premiums set by employers.

In many cases, uninsured people are willing to rely on public hospitals if it means having the money to buy extra groceries for their family.

Despite the growing number of uninsured, surveys indicate that the public believes these people are better off than in the past. According to a 1999 report, 57 percent of people believe the uninsured are able to get the care they need when they need it, up from 43 percent in 1993.

“People know there’s a problem, but the economy has hidden a sense of the crisis,” says Harvard University professor Robert Blendon, the study’s author. “For people who have a job and insurance, life has never been better. They say, ‘I’ve never had it so good in my life – money in my pocket, the employer is worried about me leaving – everybody must be doing better.'”

Timing is everything

Some policy experts and politicians believe the time is right for a national solution for the problems of the uninsured, even though others don’t believe there’s a crisis yet.

In the Democratic presidential primary, both Vice President Al Gore and challenger Bill Bradley presented proposals to expand health coverage to millions of uninsured Americans. The difference between the two plans involved cost and scope.

Republicans George W. Bush and John McCain did not discuss the issue during the primary stage.

The real push for change could come from within the Washington Beltway, not middle America, where the problems are most acute, researchers say. That’s because the voices of the uninsured can’t be heard above the din of lobbyists.

“When Gore and Bradley both put forward proposals, that was unprecedented in terms of the attention that health-care coverage got in a presidential campaign,” said Paul B. Ginsburg, president of the Center for Studying Health System Change. “This, to me, was a sign that there may be a lot more interest on the part of the public.”

Still, Mr. West of Brown University said the real push for government reform will come when the middle class sees massive increases in health-insurance costs.

“That would be a crisis,” he said.

Charles Ornstein, who covers health business issues for The Dallas Morning News, is pursuing a yearlong fellowship through the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Child Health Facts: National and State Profiles of Coverage – Report

Published: Dec 30, 2002

Child Health Facts: National and State Profiles of Coverage

Nearly 10 million children in the United States lack health insurance coverage and over two-thirds of them or low-income. This databook provides baseline data on how many children are uninsured today and on the extent of Medicaid coverage. It provides astarting point to monitor and assess state efforts to reach and insure more children.

SCHIP Program Enrollment: June 2002 Update

Published: Dec 30, 2002

This report presents information on the number of children enrolled in SCHIP for each state, for specific months from 1998 to June 2002. As of June 2002, the SCHIP program covered 3.6 million low-income children. An increase of 571,000 from the previous June.