Partnerships Between Family Planning, Environmental Organizations Can Help Improve Contraceptive Access In Remote, Under-Served Populations
Thomson Reuters Foundation: The untold cost of cost-effectiveness in family planning
Laura Robson, manager for health-environment partnerships at Blue Ventures
“…With mounting pressure from policies introduced by U.S. President Donald Trump that cut funds for family planning programs worldwide, providers are being forced to deliver more with less. Such pressure often results in the prioritization of easily accessible urban populations at the expense of people living in remote rural areas. … [T]he experiences of health and environmental organizations working together in biodiversity hotspots across the world demonstrate that resourceful mechanisms do exist for reaching overlooked and under-served populations and advancing equitable access to contraception for the most marginalized women and girls. … Environmental organizations are inviting health agencies to piggyback onto their operational infrastructure and community relations, thereby enabling mobile service delivery and strong family planning uptake in areas previously deemed too difficult or expensive to reach. … [T]hese collaborative health-environment initiatives should serve as a courageous reminder for global health actors: it is possible to balance a drive for cost-effectiveness with a greater concern for contraceptive equity, and an appreciation of the wider value of investing in family planning for the most marginalized” (7/10).
The KFF Daily Global Health Policy Report summarized news and information on global health policy from hundreds of sources, from May 2009 through December 2020. All summaries are archived and available via search.