Survey about U.S. Role in Global Health Reports That Americans Want to Take Care of Problems at Home First in a Recession, But Say Don't Cut Funding For Global Health and Development
Two-thirds of the public supports maintaining (39%) or increasing (26%) U.S.
government funding to improve health in developing countries, while fewer than a
quarter (23%) say the government is spending too much on global health,
according to this survey of the American people’s attitudes towards U.S. global
health and development assistance. Levels of support are similar for spending
to fight HIV/AIDS in developing countries, although the public’s sense of
urgency about the HIV/AIDS epidemic around the world has declined. However,
perhaps not surprisingly given the current recession, the vast majority (71%) of
Americans say that given today’s serious economic problems the U.S. can’t afford
to spend more on global health right now.
The survey of Americans on the
U.S. role in global health was designed and analyzed by public opinion
researchers at the Kaiser Family Foundation. It was conducted January 26
through March 8, 2009 (before the international outbreak of the H1N1 influenza A
virus), among a nationally representative random sample of 2,554 adults ages 18
and older. Telephone interviews conducted by landline (N=1,951) and cell phone
(N=603, including 214 who had no landline telephone) were carried out in English
and Spanish. The survey includes oversamples of African American and Latino
respondents as well as respondents ages 18– 29. Results for all groups have been
weighted to reflect their actual distribution in the nation. The margin of
sampling error for the overall survey is plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Most questions reported here were asked of a random half-sample of respondents
and have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. For
results based on subgroups, the margin of sampling error may be higher.
News Release
Survey
Data Note