Family Health Premiums Rise 3 Percent to $13,770 in 2010, But Workers'
Share Jumps 14 Percent as Firms Shift Cost Burden
About
One In Four Covered Workers Now Face Annual Deductibles Of $1,000 Or
More, Including Nearly Half Of Those Employed By Small Businesses
WASHINGTON,
D.C. -- Workers on average are paying nearly $4,000 this year toward
the cost of family health coverage - an increase of 14 percent, or $482,
above what they paid last year, according to the benchmark 2010
Employer Health Benefits Survey released today by the Kaiser Family
Foundation and the Health Research & Educational Trust (HRET).
The
jump occurred even though the total premiums for family coverage,
including what employers themselves contribute, rose a modest 3 percent
to $13,770 on average in 2010, the survey found. In contrast, the
amount employers contribute for family coverage did not increase.
Preferred
Provider Organizations (PPOs) continue to dominate the employer market,
enrolling 58 percent of covered workers. Average PPO family premiums
topped $14,000 annually in 2010.
Since 2005, workers’
contributions to premiums have gone up 47 percent, while overall
premiums rose 27 percent, wages increased 18 percent, and inflation rose
12 percent.
Many employers are also raising the annual
deductibles workers must pay before their health plans begin to share
most health care costs. A total of 27 percent of covered workers now
face annual deductibles of at least $1,000, up from 22 percent in 2009,
the survey finds. Among small firms (3-199 workers), 46 percent face
such deductibles.
The annual Kaiser/HRET survey provides a
detailed picture of private health insurance coverage and costs. The
full report and summary of findings from the annual survey of small and
large employers will be available today
online. Selected findings will also
be published today as a Web First article in the journal
Health Affairs.
"With the economy struggling,
businesses have been shifting more of the costs of health insurance to
workers through premiums, deductibles and other cost-sharing," Kaiser
President and CEO Drew Altman, Ph.D., said. "This may be helping to stem
the rapid rise in premiums that we saw in the early 2000s, but it also
means employer coverage is less comprehensive. From a consumer
perspective, the cost of health insurance just keeps going up faster
than wages."
"High out-of-pocket expenses and premiums affect
health care decisions for patients. If premiums and costs continue to
be shifted to consumers, households will face difficult choices, like
forgoing needed care, or reexamining how they can best care for their
families," said Maulik Joshi, Dr.P.H., president of HRET and senior vice
president for research at the American Hospital Association.
The
nation’s recession contributed to the shift in burden to workers. In
response to the economic downturn, 30 percent of employers say they
reduced the scope of health benefits or increased cost sharing, and 23
percent report increasing the amount employees pay for coverage, the
survey finds.
Among other plan types, only consumer-driven plans
(which are high-deductible plans that also include a tax-preferred
savings options such as a Health Savings Account or Health Reimbursement
Arrangement) saw growth in their market share. Such plans now enroll
13 percent of covered workers, up from 8 percent last year.
"Consumer-driven
plans have clearly established a foothold in the employer market,
tripling their market share from 4 percent in 2006 to 13 percent today,"
said study lead author Gary Claxton, a Kaiser vice president and
director of the Healthcare Marketplace Project.
Surprisingly, the
survey saw the percentage of firms offering health benefits in 2010
increase sharply to 69 percent, up from 60 percent in 2009, largely
because of an increase in the offer rate among firms with 3 to 9
workers. Because most workers are employed by large firms, the shift
among the smallest firms did not have a major effect on either the
percentage of workers offered health benefits or the percentage of
workers covered at their job.
The reason for the large increase
in offer rate is unclear. Because of the poor economic climate in
2010, it is unlikely that many firms began offering coverage this year.
A possible explanation is that non-offering firms were more likely to
fail during the past year, with the attrition of non-offering firms
leading to a higher offer rate among surviving firms.
Other
findings from the survey include:
•
Single coverage. The
survey also tracks the premiums for worker-only health benefits, which
increased 5 percent in 2010 to reach $5,049 annually. Workers on
average are paying $899 annually for single coverage, up from $779 in
2009. Forty-seven percent of covered workers are in single coverage
plans.
•
Physician office visits. Among covered workers with a
copayment for in-network physician office visits, the average copayment
increased a small but statistically significant amount from 2009 to
2010 -- from $20 to $22 for primary care and from $28 to $31 for
specialty care.
•
Mental health benefits. In response to the
2008 Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, 31 percent of firms
with more than 50 workers made changes to the mental health benefits
they offer. Most of this group eliminated limits on coverage to comply
with the law, though a small share (5 percent of those making changes)
dropped mental health coverage altogether.
•
Wellness
benefits. About three-fourths (74 percent) of employers offering health
benefits offer at least one of the following wellness programs: weight
loss program, gym membership discounts or on-site exercise facilities,
smoking cessation program, personal health coaching, classes in
nutrition or healthy living, web-based resources for healthy living, or a
wellness newsletter.
•
Health risk assessments. Among firms
offering coverage, 11 percent give their employees the option of
completing a health risk assessment to help employees identify potential
health risks. Within this group, 22 percent -- or a relatively small
two percent of all employers -- offer financial incentives such as
lowering the worker’s share of premiums or offering merchandise, gift
cards, travel, or cash to their workers. Large firms are more likely
than small firms both to offer assessments and to offer financial
incentives.
Now in its 12th year, the survey is a joint project
of the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research &
Educational Trust. The survey was conducted between January and May of
2010 and included 3,143 randomly selected, non-federal public and
private firms with three or more employees (2,046 of which responded to
the full survey and 1,097 of which responded to a single question about
offering coverage). A research team at Kaiser and HRET conducted and
analyzed the survey, led by Kaiser’s Gary Claxton and including
researchers at the National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the
University of Chicago (working on the project under contract to HRET).
For more information on the survey methodology, please visit the Survey
Design and Methods Section at
http://ehbs.kff.org.
# # #
The
Kaiser Family Foundation is a non-profit private operating foundation,
based in Menlo Park, California, dedicated to producing and
communicating the best possible analysis and information on health
issues.
Founded in 1944, the Health Research & Educational
Trust (HRET) is a private, not-for-profit organization involved in
research, education, and demonstration programs addressing health
management and policy issues. An affiliate of the American Hospital
Association (AHA), HRET collaborates with health care, government,
academic, business, and community organizations across the United States
to conduct research and disseminate findings that shape the future of
health care. For more information about HRET, visit http://www.hret.org.
Health
Affairs, published by Project HOPE, is the leading journal of health
policy. The peer-reviewed journal appears each month in print, with
additional Web First papers published several times a month at
http://www.healthaffairs.org. The full text of each Health Affairs Web
First paper is available free of charge to all Web site visitors for a
two-week period following posting, after which it switches to
pay-per-view for nonsubscribers. Web First papers are supported in part
by a grant from The Commonwealth Fund.